The Susan Boyle Op-Plan
By The Anonymous Physicist
Ordinarily I would not write about a singer. But there is much to learn about how the perfidious PTB operate, from the Susan Boyle phenomenon. The Scottish woman, Susan Boyle, rocketed to fame on April 11, 2009, when an earlier taped broadcast of her audition level singing for the British TV show, “Britain’s Got Talent” was aired. The cleverly packaged episode showed the three judges, Piers Morgan, Amanda Holden and Simon Cowell, and most of the members of the large audience frowning upon the middle aged, chubby, frumpy Scotswoman before she began to sing.
Once she began to sing, the audience quickly changed their minds, and were mostly on their feet wildly applauding till she finished. The three judges also knew that they had someone, and something, special on their hands now. Many people found her singing to be excellent, angelic, even of a healing quality. The judges sort of apologized for themselves, and the audience, in believing that just because someone was not attractive in the usual accepted sense, that they couldn’t be very talented. Now there are some that say she is a terrible or average singer even in that first performance; and they are entitled to their opinions. But such opinions seem both to be coming from jealous internet trolls, and in the great minority. I am biased, and I also have no qualifications in music; but I made a point of listening to the ”professionals” singing that song. The song she sang is “I Dreamed a Dream” from the musical play, “Les Miserables.” I heard Elaine Paige and Patti Lupone sing that song, and Ms. Boyle sang it vastly better than either of these “professionals” (in my opinion.) Of course, one reason for the tremendous popularity of Ms Boyle’s performance is the "anywoman" quality she possesses, and the immediate change in her circumstances of joblessness, loneliness, taking care of her elderly, dying mother, etc. metamorphosizing into great popularity, soon to be followed by great wealth, etc. She portrayed her own sad personal life as “never having been kissed” which obvious likely entails her being an “old maid” [virgin]. She later seems to have recanted the never having been kissed bit, which led some to start calling her a liar and worse. Ms. Boyle is even said to have had learning difficulties as a child from being deprived of oxygen at birth. But I found her to be quick and sharp-witted in her interactions with the judges, etc.
As of May 30, some reports say her youtube hits have reached 285 million. Other reports merely cite one youtube entry at 64 million or so. Shortly I will indicate that I think the true number is much larger, and is being suppressed. Many people report that since they first listened to her, they have to hear her again every day. Some have said it is the best way to start their day; others say it helps them to sleep better. Ms. Boyle has made video appearances on numerous American TV shows including Larry King and Oprah Winfrey. Curiously some had predicted that such appearances would skyrocket her youtube into the billions as India and even China get those shows; but this did not “officially” happen. President Obama even wanted to be seen with her, but she tuned that down.
On May 24th, Susan Boyle sang “Memories” from “Cats” on her semi-final appearance on “Britain’s Got Talent.” She did not sing well at that time. She flubbed the first few notes and appeared very nervous. But by the middle and end of her rendition, she started to belt it out again; and her recovery again got the audience and judges on her side. But around that time, stories of the Susan Boyle “melt-down” began to appear. Supposedly reporters from “The Sun” tabloid said something to her that got her very upset. She supposedly let loose with “f-bombs” to both the police outside, after the “reporter” problem, and also inside she supposedly let one loose when “on the telly”, she saw Piers Morgan praising the performance of one of her child competitors. Here is where we can begin to see the hidden hand of the PTB in these matters. First I wouldn’t trust any of the three “judges” further than I could throw them. Anyone famous and/or wealthy in Britain is likely an MI5 Intel asset, or run by one. Simon Cowell is said to be worth hundreds of millions of dollars. But the British media began to have a field day over Boyle’s alleged behavior. While Cowell and Morgan are portrayed in the media as saying people should give Boyle a break and leave her alone and not stress her, and the show was trying to protect her; the truth is that the show could have prevented the incident with the “reporters” completely if it had wanted to. More likely, they set up that incident. And we do not know if there is any truth to the other incident, or if it is being greatly exaggerated. Ms. Boyle won the popular vote on her semi-finals, and thus was in the finals held live on May 30, 2009.
In the finals, Ms. Boyle’s competitions were four dance entries, four singing entries, and a saxophonist. Ms. Boyle sang an abbreviated version of “I Dreamed a Dream.” While she did not appear to be nervous this time, she also seemed to deliberately not belt it out, as she did in the first appearance. Most of the world expected Ms Boyle to win the call-in vote by a wide margin, as did the bookies. “Officially” the popular vote, based on calls phoned in at the end of the show had Ms Boyle coming in second place to the dance group “Diversity.” Ms. Boyle was gracious in congratulating Diversity. But here is where some real conspiracy shows itself. First one judge and many others thought the very similar dance contestant group “Flawless” performed better. Certainly such a similar dance group would have split that voting demographic. Ms. Boyle, on the other hand, was really the only adult singer (not counting the grandfather in a duo who is not in Boyle’s league.) Then there was the issue of how two judges (Cowell and Holden) said, after Diversity’s performance, how incredible and perfect they were and they could win, etc. IMO, their words and actions were not so much trying to tell people how to vote, AS IT WAS AN EXCUSE FOR WHAT THEY KNEW WOULD TRANSPIRE! In Intel agency lingo, this is the Plausible Denial aspect. The judges simply declared that Diversity were… well flawless, despite that being the name of the other group which was actually better. But oh that name “Diversity,” and their mixed racial make-up is just what the PTB love to portray as able to get ahead in British or American society.
I have already seen numerous people write that when they tried to phone in and vote for Boyle, they only got repeated error messages. Another person has shown that the viewership on youtube for Boyle’s performance was, in the next few hours, 2-3 times what the viewership was for Diversity’s performance. I believe this is an indication of the actual voting! While only Brits could vote, all the indications are that the voting was fixed, and the three judges likely were in on it—certainly Simon Cowell likely was, based on what he said. So it seems that the PTB wanted Ms. Boyle not to win, public be damned. Apparently they fear anyone becoming enormously popular. Such a person could then have a large audience that they might spew some truth to. And maybe Ms. Boyle had not yet been sworn into whatever secret group/oath that they want the noveau riche or noveau populaire to swear to. It also tells the public that the PTB can fix anything, the masses should feel powerless. I for one will never watch that show again. Ms Boyle should not fret about not being allowed to sing before the Queen [foul bloodline of the evil Annunaki?], as Diversity will.
Ms. Boyle suited the PTB in portraying an anywoman, or everyperson, who the system might sometimes allow to get popular, even rich; but when our species showed that they could correct their error in judgment and made her massively popular—true youtube hits are probably over a billion and is being suppressed—the PTB began to fear her popularity and the masses having some say in ANY matter. So they used their Intel-controlled MSM to set her up and badly portrayed her, and then fixed the vote. Ms Boyle will likely make and sell many CDs, unfortunately under the control of Simon Cowell. There is also talk of a movie and a book. The Scottish woman will probably be watched carefully by British Intel to make sure this now immensely popular person does not say anything true and important in the future. By the way she acted in the finals, she seems to be going along with her new controllers in exchange for fame and fortune—but that could always change.
The Susan Boyle Op allows us a window into how the PTB and their Intel-controlled media work. They want the poor and middle class to go along with their humanity-destroying ways, and to just hope and DREAM A DREAM that any of us could get ahead— but not too far ahead, and never out of their clutches. But for the most part, they show that they fear all us “Les Miserables” if we were allowed to know the truth of anything, or if we got together and realized the immense power such a global fraternity would yield! The PTB fear the real change and loss of control that would then enSue. Susan Boyle: I hope you have some William Wallace in you—FREEDOM!
Ordinarily I would not write about a singer. But there is much to learn about how the perfidious PTB operate, from the Susan Boyle phenomenon. The Scottish woman, Susan Boyle, rocketed to fame on April 11, 2009, when an earlier taped broadcast of her audition level singing for the British TV show, “Britain’s Got Talent” was aired. The cleverly packaged episode showed the three judges, Piers Morgan, Amanda Holden and Simon Cowell, and most of the members of the large audience frowning upon the middle aged, chubby, frumpy Scotswoman before she began to sing.
Once she began to sing, the audience quickly changed their minds, and were mostly on their feet wildly applauding till she finished. The three judges also knew that they had someone, and something, special on their hands now. Many people found her singing to be excellent, angelic, even of a healing quality. The judges sort of apologized for themselves, and the audience, in believing that just because someone was not attractive in the usual accepted sense, that they couldn’t be very talented. Now there are some that say she is a terrible or average singer even in that first performance; and they are entitled to their opinions. But such opinions seem both to be coming from jealous internet trolls, and in the great minority. I am biased, and I also have no qualifications in music; but I made a point of listening to the ”professionals” singing that song. The song she sang is “I Dreamed a Dream” from the musical play, “Les Miserables.” I heard Elaine Paige and Patti Lupone sing that song, and Ms. Boyle sang it vastly better than either of these “professionals” (in my opinion.) Of course, one reason for the tremendous popularity of Ms Boyle’s performance is the "anywoman" quality she possesses, and the immediate change in her circumstances of joblessness, loneliness, taking care of her elderly, dying mother, etc. metamorphosizing into great popularity, soon to be followed by great wealth, etc. She portrayed her own sad personal life as “never having been kissed” which obvious likely entails her being an “old maid” [virgin]. She later seems to have recanted the never having been kissed bit, which led some to start calling her a liar and worse. Ms. Boyle is even said to have had learning difficulties as a child from being deprived of oxygen at birth. But I found her to be quick and sharp-witted in her interactions with the judges, etc.
As of May 30, some reports say her youtube hits have reached 285 million. Other reports merely cite one youtube entry at 64 million or so. Shortly I will indicate that I think the true number is much larger, and is being suppressed. Many people report that since they first listened to her, they have to hear her again every day. Some have said it is the best way to start their day; others say it helps them to sleep better. Ms. Boyle has made video appearances on numerous American TV shows including Larry King and Oprah Winfrey. Curiously some had predicted that such appearances would skyrocket her youtube into the billions as India and even China get those shows; but this did not “officially” happen. President Obama even wanted to be seen with her, but she tuned that down.
On May 24th, Susan Boyle sang “Memories” from “Cats” on her semi-final appearance on “Britain’s Got Talent.” She did not sing well at that time. She flubbed the first few notes and appeared very nervous. But by the middle and end of her rendition, she started to belt it out again; and her recovery again got the audience and judges on her side. But around that time, stories of the Susan Boyle “melt-down” began to appear. Supposedly reporters from “The Sun” tabloid said something to her that got her very upset. She supposedly let loose with “f-bombs” to both the police outside, after the “reporter” problem, and also inside she supposedly let one loose when “on the telly”, she saw Piers Morgan praising the performance of one of her child competitors. Here is where we can begin to see the hidden hand of the PTB in these matters. First I wouldn’t trust any of the three “judges” further than I could throw them. Anyone famous and/or wealthy in Britain is likely an MI5 Intel asset, or run by one. Simon Cowell is said to be worth hundreds of millions of dollars. But the British media began to have a field day over Boyle’s alleged behavior. While Cowell and Morgan are portrayed in the media as saying people should give Boyle a break and leave her alone and not stress her, and the show was trying to protect her; the truth is that the show could have prevented the incident with the “reporters” completely if it had wanted to. More likely, they set up that incident. And we do not know if there is any truth to the other incident, or if it is being greatly exaggerated. Ms. Boyle won the popular vote on her semi-finals, and thus was in the finals held live on May 30, 2009.
In the finals, Ms. Boyle’s competitions were four dance entries, four singing entries, and a saxophonist. Ms. Boyle sang an abbreviated version of “I Dreamed a Dream.” While she did not appear to be nervous this time, she also seemed to deliberately not belt it out, as she did in the first appearance. Most of the world expected Ms Boyle to win the call-in vote by a wide margin, as did the bookies. “Officially” the popular vote, based on calls phoned in at the end of the show had Ms Boyle coming in second place to the dance group “Diversity.” Ms. Boyle was gracious in congratulating Diversity. But here is where some real conspiracy shows itself. First one judge and many others thought the very similar dance contestant group “Flawless” performed better. Certainly such a similar dance group would have split that voting demographic. Ms. Boyle, on the other hand, was really the only adult singer (not counting the grandfather in a duo who is not in Boyle’s league.) Then there was the issue of how two judges (Cowell and Holden) said, after Diversity’s performance, how incredible and perfect they were and they could win, etc. IMO, their words and actions were not so much trying to tell people how to vote, AS IT WAS AN EXCUSE FOR WHAT THEY KNEW WOULD TRANSPIRE! In Intel agency lingo, this is the Plausible Denial aspect. The judges simply declared that Diversity were… well flawless, despite that being the name of the other group which was actually better. But oh that name “Diversity,” and their mixed racial make-up is just what the PTB love to portray as able to get ahead in British or American society.
I have already seen numerous people write that when they tried to phone in and vote for Boyle, they only got repeated error messages. Another person has shown that the viewership on youtube for Boyle’s performance was, in the next few hours, 2-3 times what the viewership was for Diversity’s performance. I believe this is an indication of the actual voting! While only Brits could vote, all the indications are that the voting was fixed, and the three judges likely were in on it—certainly Simon Cowell likely was, based on what he said. So it seems that the PTB wanted Ms. Boyle not to win, public be damned. Apparently they fear anyone becoming enormously popular. Such a person could then have a large audience that they might spew some truth to. And maybe Ms. Boyle had not yet been sworn into whatever secret group/oath that they want the noveau riche or noveau populaire to swear to. It also tells the public that the PTB can fix anything, the masses should feel powerless. I for one will never watch that show again. Ms Boyle should not fret about not being allowed to sing before the Queen [foul bloodline of the evil Annunaki?], as Diversity will.
Ms. Boyle suited the PTB in portraying an anywoman, or everyperson, who the system might sometimes allow to get popular, even rich; but when our species showed that they could correct their error in judgment and made her massively popular—true youtube hits are probably over a billion and is being suppressed—the PTB began to fear her popularity and the masses having some say in ANY matter. So they used their Intel-controlled MSM to set her up and badly portrayed her, and then fixed the vote. Ms Boyle will likely make and sell many CDs, unfortunately under the control of Simon Cowell. There is also talk of a movie and a book. The Scottish woman will probably be watched carefully by British Intel to make sure this now immensely popular person does not say anything true and important in the future. By the way she acted in the finals, she seems to be going along with her new controllers in exchange for fame and fortune—but that could always change.
The Susan Boyle Op allows us a window into how the PTB and their Intel-controlled media work. They want the poor and middle class to go along with their humanity-destroying ways, and to just hope and DREAM A DREAM that any of us could get ahead— but not too far ahead, and never out of their clutches. But for the most part, they show that they fear all us “Les Miserables” if we were allowed to know the truth of anything, or if we got together and realized the immense power such a global fraternity would yield! The PTB fear the real change and loss of control that would then enSue. Susan Boyle: I hope you have some William Wallace in you—FREEDOM!
posted by spooked at 7:43 AM
<< Home