The Strange Case of Lloyde England
(UPDATED BELOW)
I watched this latest video by CIT on Pentagon taxi-cab light-pole "victim" Lloyde England, and it is pretty mind-boggling in its implications.
Now the video is pretty long-- over 90 minutes*-- but it has some amazing stuff.
All right, so the first thing is that England's official story of the light-pole (knocked over by flight 77 flying overhead) into his cab just doesn't make sense-- there's no way the huge pole went into his car and got pulled out without the hood being scratched or dented.
But the really wild part of this video is when Craig Ranke shows England photos from 9/11, showing where his cab was when it was struck, and England says the pictures weren't where it happened. It is truly bizarre.
Either:
1) he is lying
2) he is extremely confused (hard to believe he was this confused unless he was on serious psychotropic drugs, and he doesn't seem to be drugged)
3) the photos were manipulated
4) his cab was moved from where his accident was and the photos were staged with an actor to fit the official flight path
#1, 3 and 4 are possible, and I personally suspect some combination of these three.
Where he SAYS he was actually supports the northerly flight approach, and it seems like the light pole-cab incident could have been set-up to support the official flight path story.
There are a number of very odd things about England.
-- reads David Icke, took some conspiracy course (not clear where)
-- makes a number of cryptic statements that could have deeper meaning
-- his wife apparently supports the flyover theory
-- in a conversation with Jeff Hill, says he is poor, but he has a nice house, with fancy artwork, has his own property in the country
-- has two life-size Egyptian mummy cases (sarcophagi) in his living room
-- his cab # is 677 (the 77 is meaningful for flight 77 and is an Illuminati number of significance)
So he is a suspicious character, to be sure-- and he pretty much destroys the official story of the Pentagon.
*frankly I skipped through parts of it to save time since much of the material is recapped throughout and some of the stuff I already knew.
UPDATE:
These two pics show rather different positions of England's cab (pics via StevenWarran). The positions are not that far apart, if you look at a map from above, but they are clearly different. This STRONGLY supports funny business either with the photos being faked or the scene staged.
(pics can be enlarged by clicking on them)
I watched this latest video by CIT on Pentagon taxi-cab light-pole "victim" Lloyde England, and it is pretty mind-boggling in its implications.
Now the video is pretty long-- over 90 minutes*-- but it has some amazing stuff.
All right, so the first thing is that England's official story of the light-pole (knocked over by flight 77 flying overhead) into his cab just doesn't make sense-- there's no way the huge pole went into his car and got pulled out without the hood being scratched or dented.
But the really wild part of this video is when Craig Ranke shows England photos from 9/11, showing where his cab was when it was struck, and England says the pictures weren't where it happened. It is truly bizarre.
Either:
1) he is lying
2) he is extremely confused (hard to believe he was this confused unless he was on serious psychotropic drugs, and he doesn't seem to be drugged)
3) the photos were manipulated
4) his cab was moved from where his accident was and the photos were staged with an actor to fit the official flight path
#1, 3 and 4 are possible, and I personally suspect some combination of these three.
Where he SAYS he was actually supports the northerly flight approach, and it seems like the light pole-cab incident could have been set-up to support the official flight path story.
There are a number of very odd things about England.
-- reads David Icke, took some conspiracy course (not clear where)
-- makes a number of cryptic statements that could have deeper meaning
-- his wife apparently supports the flyover theory
-- in a conversation with Jeff Hill, says he is poor, but he has a nice house, with fancy artwork, has his own property in the country
-- has two life-size Egyptian mummy cases (sarcophagi) in his living room
-- his cab # is 677 (the 77 is meaningful for flight 77 and is an Illuminati number of significance)
So he is a suspicious character, to be sure-- and he pretty much destroys the official story of the Pentagon.
*frankly I skipped through parts of it to save time since much of the material is recapped throughout and some of the stuff I already knew.
UPDATE:
These two pics show rather different positions of England's cab (pics via StevenWarran). The positions are not that far apart, if you look at a map from above, but they are clearly different. This STRONGLY supports funny business either with the photos being faked or the scene staged.
(pics can be enlarged by clicking on them)
posted by spooked at 7:21 AM
12 Comments:
The white car is a taxi?
And was England interviewed by Shure/Hill?
here is a pic of the cab.
Maybe this hould be posted instead of the white car.
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_j1WCY4T_2yI/R7cZwE55zWI/AAAAAAAACjE/MjUiwgwAViA/s400/lyode+england.jpg
I think what should perhaps be focused on--though I think this whole matter is fruitless as it contains physical impossibilities--is the cab.
The photo shows windshield damage and nothing else that I can tell.
Yet the Warren piece says the car "was totaled" and a "support group" donated a new cab for him. (Wink.)
Translation--get rid of the evidence, as with JFK's Limo.
Someone examining the cab could easily prove whether it was even hit by that light pole or not. (I suspect not.)
But I do like how both his first and last name provide us with where this goes.
Lloyd (of London) and England.
P.S. Just found this link:
http://pilotsfor911truth.org/forum/lofiversion/index.php?t58.html
It says that his car was impounded, but was towed back to him the very next day.
And replacing a windshield does not a "car totaled" make.
So why was he given funds for a new car? And what else was he given?!
And what was the final "dispostion" of the cab?
With JFK's limo, there are several changing stories. One says the Air Force dropped it from great altitude into the ocean.
I think it now has company...
Anonymous Physicist
Oh, I see above, he did do an interview with Jeff Hill/Shure. That's enough for me, as I outed Shure, years ago, sadly when almost all others didn't want to see what he is. (His FBI agent call was the most obvious I pointed out.)
But I did watch this shorter video on Lloyd:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-5090691830986329305#
At least I got some laughs. My fave was when it says a woman at the FBI was told they can't find this Lloyd England witness, and she tells her colleagues--I know where he is, he's my husband.
Again my advice.
Follow the car to its end. Find out what happened to it.
A.P.
AP-- the car was stored by LE, under a tarp, at his private property in the Va countryside. If you watch the original video I linked to, it shows this, and some close-up shots of the cab.
Thanks.
I was wondering about the final status of the cab.
As far as I know, the cab is still under a tarp in the Virginia countryside.
The house with the Egyptian sarcophagi is not Lloyde's. Craig Ranke says in the video to set up that scene at 57:20: "we wanted to stop by my host's house, I was staying at some friends' house, we wanted to stop by so I could pull up the images on the computer that we had that showed the perspective and showed definitively his true location on the bridge, on the south side of the bridge that day."
However Ranke has reported that Lloyde does have his home in Arlington with an additional 40 acres of property in the country, a $50,000 truck, a brand new cab twice over since 9/11, as well as his motorcycle that he rides with the Blue Knights, a law enforcement fraternity. Although not "rich" he's clearly not poor. CIT has an entire section of their forum devoted to Lloyde and his cab here:
http://z3.invisionfree.com/CIT/index.php?showforum=15
There is zero evidence of photo manipulation. There are multiple sources for images AND video showing his location south of the bridge AND of course in the video you see how Lloyde even brought Ranke to his neighbor who allegedly took images that day showing the cab and light pole south of the bridge! So Lloyde's own independent source also corroborates all other images and video. Lloyde's steadfast denial of this was an attempt to distance himself from the perpetrators. Clearly the scene was staged and obviously he would have to be aware of this. There's no way around it. He is lying and a part of the cover-up or else completely brainwashed which isn't likely since they also caught him off-camera admitting that his neighbor was "up on the bridge" when he took pictures of the cab and pole proving he was well aware of his true location.
I have found a picture that irrefuatbly proves photo manipulation of the cab scene:
http://www.911oz.com/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=45233&postcount=1
Can someone point me to some law of physics , legal requirement, or maybe results of some extensive survey of incidents where cars were hit by lightpoles knocked over by low flying aircraft , that says the pole must hit the hood of the car? Lloyde England said the pole did not hit the hood. He said when he took it out it did not damage the hood. He is the one who pointed out the fact that the hood wasn't damaged. If the hood is not damaged then the lightpole didn't hit the hood. He brought these people to see the car. He let them take photgraphs of the car. You would imagine while these clowns were crawling all over the car and taking pictures, it might just occur to them that this might not be some big false flag deception military black operation cover up.
For my part one and all ought to look at it.
Post a Comment
<< Home