Humint Events Online: Rense and Wood: Disinfoteque

Wednesday, August 24, 2011

Rense and Wood: Disinfoteque

11 minutes, in, Wood is asked about what can turn solids into dust, and instead of mentioning a nuclear blast, says "the Hutchison effect". Now, as far as I can tell, the Hutchison effect is completely fraudulent, but even assuming there is something to it, nowhere has anyone shown the Hutchison effect turning steel into dust. So this is complete misdirection. What happens next is even more remarkable-- Wood starts referring to chain reactions of disintegration. But instead of referring to the obvious example-- nuclear fission, she ascribes it to the bogus Hutchison effect. Then, just as remarkably, Wood mentions the Bankers Trust building being contaminated, so they had to tear it down even though it wasn't really damaged. Contaminated-- no, not by radioactive material, but by some mysterious chain reaction, according to Wood. Then they go onto discuss the fine dust made during the destruction of the WTC, and of course Wood doesn't mention that high explosives and especially nuclear explosions, produce fine dust from disintegrating the substance. No, it's some MYSTERIOUS effect we don't know what it is, even though in every way, the evidence she describes perfectly fits nuclear demolition. And of course, much of the other strangeness can be explained by EMP effects, and EMPs are well known to be produced during nuclear blasts. But does Wood ever mention this? Not that I've heard. It's almost as if THEY DON'T WANT YOU TO KNOW ABOUT NUCLEAR DEMOLITION. Yeah, they will say, oh, there were no bright flashes (when there were some, and such flashes would have been greatly dampened in the way and underground nuke is mostly know by its debris trails), or there were no loud blast sounds (when there were), or the heat at Ground Zero did not even exist (though it was extremely well-documented)!

Then, at the same time, Rense starts going on and on about Israelis being behind 9/11 (when they are obvious patsies if you think about it).

Now I should note that I hadn't heard Rense before. He's got a very nice, pleasant voice and easy style-- much better than most other conspiracy hosts I've heard, particularly Alex Jones and Josh Reeves. But here we have Wood spouting the disinfo, and Rense lapping it up, and adding to the mix with his own disinfo.

It's enough to make a serious conspiracy researcher gag. Amusingly, this segment starts out with Wood complaining about all the people attacking her. I have really tried to refrain from attacking Wood as a person, but she is blatantly misrepresenting the evidence. There are other odd things about Wood's story that I won't go into here, but I will mention how incredibly slick her book is.


Anonymous Anonymous said...

You needn't have any ethical worries, Spooked, about attacking the Wood entity "as a person".

She is a CONSTRUCT, an MK Ultra-style, hollowed-out ZOMBIE whose real personality was mercilessly destroyed to make room for the artificial role her physical presence has been playing -- in the public spotlight.

So, as I urged you before, start to use your prodigious powers of Rigorous Intuition (tm), your disgruntled intel-agency contacts, and your own personal expertise in deconstructing disinfo torrents -- to FIND OUT WHO THIS "DR." JUDY WOOD REALLY IS!!!

WHO has been feeding her lines, pulling her strings, assembling and publishing her "slick" book, hawking her availability to the fringe-radio talkshows, and PAYING HER BILLS???

It ain't just Morgan Reynolds, I'll bet, for all of his "benevolent godfathering" of her bizarre persona.

Solving the "Wood Mystery" is going to be an important clue to solving 9/11, Spooked, just you wait and see.

1:42 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

So, you're never heard Jeff Rense speak before, eh?

Well, the reason he sounds so smooth is that he's one of the many top-40, professional radio announcers who (when AM-rock died, over a generation ago) made a successful move to call-in, talk-show programming.

And then he got weird (with ghosts, UFOS, political conspiracies, alternative-health "cures" etc.) and eventually wound up as an Art Bell wanabee, but with a much more attractive news-aggregator website than ol' Bell could ever hope to front.

Jeff has "an attitude" of anti-authority that is pretty intense (dating from his hippie youth) but nevertheless quite shallow and naive. (Witness his blundering straight into an easily avoidable, career-threatening public fight, over anti-semitism, with his one-time benefactor, and Bill Hicks impersonator, Alex Jones.)

But Mr. Rense fortuitously "landed on his feet" at another fringe network (that Jones doesn't control) and seems to be thriving once again.

So contact Jeff, share your well-founded doubts about the Wood/Hutchinson flim-flammery, and maybe he'll book you as a guest, too!

2:05 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I destroyed Wood and her Op, 5-6 years ago already as nothing but an Op to hide the nuking of the WTC and the CSA.

I have stated that my 9/11 nuke/CSA book, and myself as a guest, were offered to both Rense and A Jones.
Intel assets that they are, you know the answer.

Such interviews of Wood were sure giveaways as to who else is an intel agent.

All of them fawned over her and said her work was "brilliant, proven" etc., when there never was anything except photos of CSA and baby talk.

These fawning interviewers included, Fetzer, Reynolds, Rense, Webre (exopolitics scammer) and others.

Anonymous Physicist

2:28 PM  
Blogger David Howard 417-624-5326 said...


11:45 PM  
Blogger David Howard 417-624-5326 said...

Ron Paul ...

12:00 AM  
Anonymous said...

To my mind every person have to read it.

12:06 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Powered by Blogger