The Sandy Hook Hoax Hoax?

Definitely some good info here, but also some really dumb stuff. Nothing turns me off more than bad photo analysis, and calling people fake from dumb photo analysis. Also, jumping to conclusions from weak info, such as Xmas trees being at the firehouse. I don't like the fake victim idea at all for this incident (unlike say, the Boston Marathon bombing, where clearly we could see bizarre gore and clear fakery).

More than anything, Sandy Hook sounds like another drill gone "live", that would explain a lot of the evidence, particularly the Gene Rosen oddities (mostly).  Beyond any doubt, there was some cover up going on, the early interview with the Medical Examiner Carver (great name, huh?), showed that pretty well. But I still really hesitate saying that no real people died.

Two reasons the fake victims idea doesn't work for me:

1)  having fake kids and teachers "killed" at a real school, where there are other real teachers and real parents and real kids, would be far harder to cover up than a scenario where these people are actually killed by a drill gone wrong. There are too many people that could get very suspicious about the incident that way.

2) it rests too much on dumb and/or unconvincing photo analysis.

Note, I am not saying it's impossible-- just that the evidence isn't convincing.  If there is more convincing evidence, why wasn't it shown? Does anyone have more convincing evidence?

That's why I say "hoax hoax". Beyond any doubt, there was a conspiracy here. I just think saying the deaths were fake is problematic, and I also find all these people who go around saying "everything is fake" all the time, very troubling. Some real people may find this to be an easy explanation, but also I think some of these "everything is fake" people are agents of some sort.

It's worth noting that "Sophia Smallstorm" was previously in notorious for inserting some fake explosion sounds into her 9/11 Mysteries video, that went along with Rick Siegel's video. So she is a bit questionable, though Siegel is a bit of a strange case too.

Lastly, I also still need to push back on this idea that Sandy Hook was about just enacting gun control by the authorities. This is far too facile an explanation. It was always extremely unlikely that any serious gun control would get enacted, even by something like Sandy Hook. Just as likely, in my opinion, is that it was about making people more paranoid about gun control, and having them buy weapons more. I do think that weapons manufacturers are pretty evil overall, and they ultimately did benefit from this. Also, any sort of incident like this is like crack cocaine for the media, and helps them sell stuff. And there is a general societal mind fuck in any incident like this, and of course the powers that be can use this to their advantage-- distract us from other things. Incidents like this are always a test too, for the PTB, to see what they can pull off and get away with.