The WTC Collapse Still Hasn't Been Modeled in Real Life
I may have posted this before but it's good to revisit it.
The dude puts a lot of work into modeling the WTC destruction and apart from supporting the demolition theory, he does a nice job showing how the official crush down/crush up model is ridiculous.
----
I should add that I found this model in the video below after looking at this video above:
This model is extensively discussed at a Metabunk discussion page here.
Obviously there are many aspects to this very complicated WTC destruction event and it's incredibly hard to model the towers properly given scaling issues. But as noted above, one model that's been discussed a lot is the crush down - crush up concept (also see the video above). This model doesn't seem to show that. The top falls apart quite quickly rather than acting as a "piledriver" for the crush down phase.
Also, worth noting that this tower is super flimsy-- does anyone think it could survive the equivalent of a 767 slamming into its side?
posted by spooked at 8:42 PM
3 Comments:
check out the first commenters link here:
تلویزیون الیویا
i like how the 2 mohammedans somehow have a red-haired irish child.
ok re; the 2 videos:
first video does not actually apply to WTC destruction because rather than pancake collapsing (as modeled in the video) both towers (including all of the concrete and most of the massive steel beams) were rendered almost entirely into powder at the unheard of rate of 11 floors per second.
and the 2nd video does not really apply to the destruction of the twin towers rather than pancake collapsing (as modeled in the video) both towers (including all of the concrete and most of the massive steel beams) were rendered almost entirely into powder at the unheard of rate of 11 floors per second.
come on man.
good points!
Post a Comment
<< Home