The Generator "Oddity" at the 9/11 Pentagon Crash Site

9/11 researcher Killtown had this analysis at his old site about the damage to a generator at the Pentagon that was caused by whatever hit the Pentagon: http://killtown.911review.org/flight77/generator.html 

His site is gone now but you can see the webpage, which seems to be basically intact, at the wayback machine: https://web.archive.org/web/20111119134645/http://killtown.911review.org/flight77/generator.html

The analysis is complicated but basically the idea is something flying into the Pentagon hit a generator outside the Pentagon that was being used as backup power for the renovation going on there. The generator was badly damaged and knocked towards the Pentagon.

In a very superficial way, the generator damage is consistent with a 757 engine hitting it and thus the official story.

However, there are problems, as described in the piece: http://killtown.911review.org/flight77/generator.html 

            The generator is indicated by arrows 5&6 above.

Essentially a careful look at the damage suggests that it's hard to see how the plane engine could go so low as to create that hole in the fence around the generator but not break off as it slams into the generator or doesn't wreck the lower part of the generator (though it does push the generator backward).

 Conceivably the plane engine could have hit higher on the generator and still damaged the fence like that, but still there is the question of the gouge in the top of the generator and it simply doesn't fit how the plane wing would hit the generator. There is a faring below the plane wing that conceivably could make the gouge but the angle is way off (see below).

Additionally, the Killtown piece has a lot of witness testimony and I gotta say that I find it hard to believe any witness that says they could see much detail about a plane supposedly going 500 mph, like which way the wings were tilted before it struck the building or that the wing hit the generator as it went in, when they would have only seen it clearly for a second as it zoomed by.

Overall, the bottom line is that the damage to the generator indicates something flew into the Pentagon but not quite a Boeing 757.

It's quite reminiscent of the bizarre flight 93 crash where the imprint on the ground is SORT OF plane like but not quite.

And of course both sites have similar anomalies like:

1) lack of major plane debris around crash site

2) lack of recovered debris, especially missing tails and engines

3) strange phone calls

4) discrepancies for time of crash