Kerry, Bush, bin Laden and Tora Bora
From the point of view of 9/11 conspiracists, excuse me, 9/11 skeptics, the most interesting thing that has happened in the presidential campaign is Kerry pressing Bush about bin Laden and especially about letting bin Laden get away at Tora Bora.
First there is the interesting spectacle of the media completely ignoring the fact that Bush blatantly lied when he denied that he ever said he didn't worry or think much about bin Laden anymore.
Of course, to the media, the storyline is Bush: Strong on Terror!, and nothing, NOTHING!, will sway them from this point of view.
But even more interesting is seeing Kerry mention that Bush clearly let bin Laden get away in Tora Bora by not committing enough troops.
Well gosh-- this is borderline conspiracyism! Why on earth WOULDN'T Bush go after bin Laden? There must be something wrong with Kerry to even dare to ask such a thing!
Such must be the logic of Bush supporters, who probably simply did not even hear this bit of cognitive dissonance being presented to them, since it was coming from Kerry. And heaven forbid any reporter dare ask Bush about this subject, or even ask one of his supporters. Heaven forbid this fairly important matter be presented to the American public by the media. No. This subject must be avoided at all cost.
It almost goes without saying that to 9/11 skeptics, it is perfectly OBVIOUS why Bush is ignoring bin Laden and why he let him get away at Tora Bora.
Four words sum it up pretty well: "CIA asset" and "drug smuggling".
(For details, see Michael Ruppert's "Crossing the Rubicon" and Daniel Hopsicker's "Welcome to Terrorland", among other good references.)
First there is the interesting spectacle of the media completely ignoring the fact that Bush blatantly lied when he denied that he ever said he didn't worry or think much about bin Laden anymore.
Of course, to the media, the storyline is Bush: Strong on Terror!, and nothing, NOTHING!, will sway them from this point of view.
But even more interesting is seeing Kerry mention that Bush clearly let bin Laden get away in Tora Bora by not committing enough troops.
Well gosh-- this is borderline conspiracyism! Why on earth WOULDN'T Bush go after bin Laden? There must be something wrong with Kerry to even dare to ask such a thing!
Such must be the logic of Bush supporters, who probably simply did not even hear this bit of cognitive dissonance being presented to them, since it was coming from Kerry. And heaven forbid any reporter dare ask Bush about this subject, or even ask one of his supporters. Heaven forbid this fairly important matter be presented to the American public by the media. No. This subject must be avoided at all cost.
It almost goes without saying that to 9/11 skeptics, it is perfectly OBVIOUS why Bush is ignoring bin Laden and why he let him get away at Tora Bora.
Four words sum it up pretty well: "CIA asset" and "drug smuggling".
(For details, see Michael Ruppert's "Crossing the Rubicon" and Daniel Hopsicker's "Welcome to Terrorland", among other good references.)
posted by spooked at 1:46 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home