"9/11 Myths"
Someone went to a lot of trouble to put together this site, which tries to debunk various 9/11 conspiracy "facts". The site seems to try a bit too hard to find holes in 9/11 "conspiracy theories" and may even be pure disinfo.
This sort of site is good to keep track of, if nothing else.
The good thing is the guy doesn't even address many of the 9/11 issues I find most compelling.
My philosophy for 9/11 is this: it is all in the details.
The planners WANTED everyone one to think that four hijacked planes crashed into various targets. But they didn't actually do this, for logistical reasons. Thus, they FAKED it. They did a good job, but the details give them away: such as the flight 93 crash site and the Pentagon crash site. They give the impression that a plane could have crashed there. But a careful analysis shows that the scenario for these two crashes doesn't add up.
And of course, there is simply no question that the WTC1, 2 and 7 buildings underwent controlled demolition. They simply could not cover this up.
This sort of site is good to keep track of, if nothing else.
The good thing is the guy doesn't even address many of the 9/11 issues I find most compelling.
My philosophy for 9/11 is this: it is all in the details.
The planners WANTED everyone one to think that four hijacked planes crashed into various targets. But they didn't actually do this, for logistical reasons. Thus, they FAKED it. They did a good job, but the details give them away: such as the flight 93 crash site and the Pentagon crash site. They give the impression that a plane could have crashed there. But a careful analysis shows that the scenario for these two crashes doesn't add up.
And of course, there is simply no question that the WTC1, 2 and 7 buildings underwent controlled demolition. They simply could not cover this up.
posted by spooked at 6:08 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home