Waste of Two Hours?
I listened to Eric Hufschmid be interviewed by Daryl Bradford Smith here.
Maybe it was not a WASTE, but the show had only about ten minutes of interesting material (as far as I am concerned).
Basically, there was a lot of bluster, a lot of commercials, a lot of blaming 9/11 on zionists and a lot of trashing people*.
The most interesting new info was that Israeli moving company vans supposedly visited the WTC regularly, and these vans later tested positive for explosives. There was an allusion to asbestos clean-up being used as an excuse to plant bombs in the WTC-- and while this makes sense, there were no sources given-- nor were any surces given during the whole interview. These are quite important claims-- if they can be verified!
*Some of the people deserved trashing, such as Tom Flocco, Stew Web and Karl Schwarz, but others such as Webster Tarpley, didn't. The trashing of Scott Ritter I am ambivalent about.
NOTE: this post was somewhat altered on Nov. 10.
Maybe it was not a WASTE, but the show had only about ten minutes of interesting material (as far as I am concerned).
Basically, there was a lot of bluster, a lot of commercials, a lot of blaming 9/11 on zionists and a lot of trashing people*.
The most interesting new info was that Israeli moving company vans supposedly visited the WTC regularly, and these vans later tested positive for explosives. There was an allusion to asbestos clean-up being used as an excuse to plant bombs in the WTC-- and while this makes sense, there were no sources given-- nor were any surces given during the whole interview. These are quite important claims-- if they can be verified!
*Some of the people deserved trashing, such as Tom Flocco, Stew Web and Karl Schwarz, but others such as Webster Tarpley, didn't. The trashing of Scott Ritter I am ambivalent about.
NOTE: this post was somewhat altered on Nov. 10.
posted by spooked at 6:38 PM
9 Comments:
I respectfully disagree with most of your thoughts here.
What do you disagree with, for example?
Did you listen to the show?
I typed in a long comment, and lost it. Dog gone!
Thanks for reviewing and adding a little bit more.
I'll find time later tonight to re-enter my comment....
It just ocurred to me that you may have listened to the broadcast live. If so, I totally support that most of your time was wasted. The broadcast being a time waster is different in my mind than an evaluation of whether the pair's commentary is valuable.
I let my fat fingers cause me to lose more stuff, so I'm taking a break....
Thanks for the replies, bg. I did find a Christopher Bollyn article that supported what Hufschmid and Smith were saying:
http://www.rense.com/general64/moss.htm
I'm not sure that I'm going to get to the posting of what I originally had typed (about Tarpley, etc.). I don't have a slam dunk case one way or another.
Thanks for the Christoper Bollyn link.
It may sound like I'm switching with the following (against Bollyn). I'm not switching, just raising questions. I'm mainly saying things still are confusing to me.
#1. Why in the Hell is this article accessible at Rense and not on americanfreepress.org?
(Rense is not necessarily worthless, but based on their quality control on postings, next to worthless (especially when there is not active link to original).
#2. Everywhere I looked, I could find only the allegations (such as bomb traces in the van) without a footnote or link.
#3. I wouldn't be nearly as steamed and accusatory if it weren't for the importance of having facts and theories that won't lead the 9/11 Truth advocates to being debunked or discredited.
#4. For the first time, I'm ready to believe that Skolnick
(http://www.skolnicksreport.com) is part of the black op? I don't want to start a fight about this. I truely don't have conclusive evidence. The question needs to be asked.
For those who want to look at the trail of confusion, look at the cluster of stuff that floats around stewwebb.com, tomflocco.com, cloakanddagger.de, rense.com. I don't know how many others have tried to follow finding the "truth" of 9/11 and NWO stuff throw these web sites as vehicles. I, for one, am getting more and more vague feelings of "being had."
OK, I did find this from Americanfreepress.net. On page seven are references to a moving van in Washington State being seized and that tests positive for explosives.
On page eleven, there is the 911 dancing Israelis story.
Seeing this PDF that promotes a message that I think most people would identify as an anti-Israeli agenda makes me wonder:
Is it better to have 9/11 facts that leave out Israeli connections, or facts that seem want to villify Israeli influence without time spent on all the other related conspirators?
Big News! Is anybody watching Weldon on C-Span right new.
I owe cloakanddagger.de an apology. The facts about Able Danger and the Brocklyn "bucket" shop is just like they said on their show.
Post a Comment
<< Home