New Second Hit Video
Here (scroll down to bottom).
Weird-- the approach path the plane takes to the building is VERY DIFFERENT from other videos.
I suspect this yet another fake.
UPDATE: The reason I think this is a fake is because of the extreme angle the plane takes to approach the tower. Basically, it is coming at the tower from a southwest approach, to hit a target facing straight south-- which meant the plane would have:
a) hit the tower at about a 45 degree angle-- whereas shots of the plane hitting the south face have it coming in essentially straight, with both wings hitting at the same time. There simply is not enough time for the plane to turn flush to the building in the Body Atomic/CNN clip.
b) if you track the plane's path outward from where it was going, the plane should have smashed out the east wall of the south tower. Certainly from the approach the plane takes, and the speed it is going at, it does not seem possible for it to hit the southeast corner of the tower (where the hole was) yet come straight out the northeast corner. Just not possible.
Interestingly, this camera angle is identical to the shot CNN uses in one clip with Aaron Brown-- the "actual-crash.avi" footage you can find pretty easily through Google. Tip to PerpetualYnquisitve for this pick-up.
UPDATE 2: Note, this video manipulation doesn't necessarily mean there was no plane there. For instance, CNN may just have wanted dramatic footage of the plane they could show from Aaron Brown's "rooftop" vantage point, so they made footage showing the plane coming into the WTC at an extreme angle. I suspect the BodyAtomic video was some version of the CNN footage.
Weird-- the approach path the plane takes to the building is VERY DIFFERENT from other videos.
I suspect this yet another fake.
UPDATE: The reason I think this is a fake is because of the extreme angle the plane takes to approach the tower. Basically, it is coming at the tower from a southwest approach, to hit a target facing straight south-- which meant the plane would have:
a) hit the tower at about a 45 degree angle-- whereas shots of the plane hitting the south face have it coming in essentially straight, with both wings hitting at the same time. There simply is not enough time for the plane to turn flush to the building in the Body Atomic/CNN clip.
b) if you track the plane's path outward from where it was going, the plane should have smashed out the east wall of the south tower. Certainly from the approach the plane takes, and the speed it is going at, it does not seem possible for it to hit the southeast corner of the tower (where the hole was) yet come straight out the northeast corner. Just not possible.
Interestingly, this camera angle is identical to the shot CNN uses in one clip with Aaron Brown-- the "actual-crash.avi" footage you can find pretty easily through Google. Tip to PerpetualYnquisitve for this pick-up.
UPDATE 2: Note, this video manipulation doesn't necessarily mean there was no plane there. For instance, CNN may just have wanted dramatic footage of the plane they could show from Aaron Brown's "rooftop" vantage point, so they made footage showing the plane coming into the WTC at an extreme angle. I suspect the BodyAtomic video was some version of the CNN footage.
posted by spooked at 11:58 AM
2 Comments:
It is another fake, do a search for actual-crash.avi, watch the zoom-in at the 2nd 'plane' impact and then compare the angle to this 'new' video. The actual-crash.avi is one of the Aaron Brown 'rooftop' clips.
Solving the mystery of 9/11, one frame at a time. :)
It amazes me that anyone would post these 'new' videos. They are terrible, considering that there has been 4+ years for them to doctor something half convincing.
P.S.
**VR Spooks, try a different camera angle, the CNN bluescreen angle is getting boring and it is way to easy to spot.
P.S.S.
**VR Spooks, who do I file a complaint with to get a refund for your terrible work?
Post a Comment
<< Home