A Simple Proof That No 767 Hit the WTC
Let's say instead of hitting the WTC straight on at 500 mph, a 767 flew right next to the tower at 500 mph. The plane flies close enough that one wing hits the building, say the outer half of the wing, on a 767 that is roughly 30 feet of wing.
Does this wing:
a) break off, causing the plane to lose control and crash?
b) slice through all the exterior steel columns in its path allowing the plane to continue flying?
If you believe the official 9/11 story, it should be (b), right?
Yet obviously the answer is (a), right? No WAY can the end of a wing slice through multiple steel columns under that situation.
SO---- on 9/11 how did the wing of a 767 slice through multiple columns and floor slabs, especially considering the plane and its wings were already slowed by the impact of the fuselage?
Does this wing:
a) break off, causing the plane to lose control and crash?
b) slice through all the exterior steel columns in its path allowing the plane to continue flying?
If you believe the official 9/11 story, it should be (b), right?
Yet obviously the answer is (a), right? No WAY can the end of a wing slice through multiple steel columns under that situation.
SO---- on 9/11 how did the wing of a 767 slice through multiple columns and floor slabs, especially considering the plane and its wings were already slowed by the impact of the fuselage?
posted by spooked at 11:10 PM
2 Comments:
That's not proof that no 767 hit the WTC. What about a break-away wall? A real plane may not have sliced through the outer columns, but a real plane could have triggered the det cord to slice through the outer columns.
Yep, you're right. I know it's not a real proof. And I knew you would say that. :)
But I still think this little thought experiment gives some insight into what happened on 9/11.
Post a Comment
<< Home