Playing Games
The Pentagon/DOJ/USG could easily show that flight 77 hit the Pentagon as they claimed, by releasing still photos of the tail section of the plane, the black boxes, the seats of the plane, and any other large pieces of debris that are not too gruesome due to human remains. They surely have such pictures, assuming flight 77 hit the Pentagon (which of course I doubt).
Instead they have released these crappy videos which show nothing.
Who the heck knows what this white protrusion is seen in one frame. Cruise missile? Photoshop art? Strangely malformed nose of a Boeing 757? Who can tell?
The Pentagon/DOJ/USG HAD to know that this video release would spark more questions than it answered. So why did they do it?
Was this really the BEST evidence they had?
Did they really want to perpetuate the honey pot myth to keep conspiracy theorists going and then later show the REAL evidence for flight 77??
Or is this some sort of weird official admission that the Pentagon hit was fishy??
I guess I prefer the latter explanation, since I can't see how a flight that never took off on 9/11 (and maybe never even existed) could hit the Pentagon. Plus, the fact that the approach path the huge Boeing took is almost certainly physically impossible at 500+ mph.
Instead they have released these crappy videos which show nothing.
Who the heck knows what this white protrusion is seen in one frame. Cruise missile? Photoshop art? Strangely malformed nose of a Boeing 757? Who can tell?
The Pentagon/DOJ/USG HAD to know that this video release would spark more questions than it answered. So why did they do it?
Was this really the BEST evidence they had?
Did they really want to perpetuate the honey pot myth to keep conspiracy theorists going and then later show the REAL evidence for flight 77??
Or is this some sort of weird official admission that the Pentagon hit was fishy??
I guess I prefer the latter explanation, since I can't see how a flight that never took off on 9/11 (and maybe never even existed) could hit the Pentagon. Plus, the fact that the approach path the huge Boeing took is almost certainly physically impossible at 500+ mph.
6 Comments:
Of course they lie!
The Pentagon/DOJ/USG HAD to know that this video release would spark more questions than it answered. So why did they do it?
if they just keep doing that then they can drag it all out indefinitely. or until they reach a point where they wont care if the public is on to them. god help everybody if things ever reach THAT point.
Agreed this is a puzzle, look at the funding of judicial watch:
(from http://team8plus.org/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?2980 )
===
... between 1997 and 2002, Judicial Watch received $7,069,500 (unadjusted for inflation) in 19 grants from a handful of foundations including. The bulk of this funding came from just three foundations he Sarah Scaife Foundation, The Carthage Foundation and the John M. Olin Foundation, Inc.
...
The Sarah Scaife Foundation, The Carthage Foundation and the John M. Olin Foundation, Inc. fund other organisations such as the Project for the New American Century, The American Enterprise Institute and the Heritage Foundation
===
hmmm! need we ask more
by the way, what's the evidence that flight 77 "never took off on 9/11 "?
John Grist
I guess we can give up now, according to this article, the new tape proves it was flight 77!
Flight 77 not a hoax
"
American Airlines Flight 77 appears as a blurred white object just below the horizon about 90 seconds into the three-minute tapes.
The plane was travelling about 640km/h at the time of impact and is in just two frames of each tape.
The cameras point into the sun and the wall of the Pentagon is in shadow but the video clearly shows the nose and then the fuselage of Flight 77 hurtling just above the ground."
-----------
"what's the evidence that flight 77 "never took off on 9/11 "?"
Google: flight 77 BTS database Gerard Holmgren
i know that i posted a better image yesterday: link, but truly, here is an even better image: LINK.
that settles it!
thanks jha.
Post a Comment
<< Home