Totally Bizarre Plane Path for the Naudet 2nd Hit Clip
IMPORTANT-- see updates
Taken from here, it looks as though the "plane" is crawling up the side of the building-- or at minimum coming from a much different angle than the commonly accepted 2nd hit proximal approach path.
Before:
The "plane" arrives:
Circle shows "plane", line denotes "standard" proximal approach path for the 2nd plane:
UPDATE: Marcus Icke, of Ghost Gun fame, says the apparent approach path discrepency of the Naudet clip here is an optical illusion. He has analyzed these images somewhat more than me, and therefore his judgment must given some weight.
UPDATE 2: Further analyses show Icke is essentially right. The approach clearly looks odd, but this is explained by the very odd perspective. The diagram below shows the path is basically on target for the entry spot. Two black lines represent a 3D continuation of the tower, and clearly the south wall is quite a bit lower than the east and north walls.
Definitely a cautionary note for some of the plane path claims I have been making here. I will have to go back and re-analyze some of them. However I am quite confident that the other videos I have been analyzing do not have such an extreme perspective.
UPDATE 3 (12/28/08): Looking at this again, I think while my 2 updated analysis still basically holds, there is still a problem with the actual trajectory of the plane: it is coming in at an ascending angle rather than flat or slightly descending angle (with respect to the tower), as most videos show. Note the plane path line is not parallel to the line on the tower from the mechanical floors-- the plane is on an ascent with respect to the hitting the right spot on the tower.
Taken from here, it looks as though the "plane" is crawling up the side of the building-- or at minimum coming from a much different angle than the commonly accepted 2nd hit proximal approach path.
Before:
The "plane" arrives:
Circle shows "plane", line denotes "standard" proximal approach path for the 2nd plane:
UPDATE: Marcus Icke, of Ghost Gun fame, says the apparent approach path discrepency of the Naudet clip here is an optical illusion. He has analyzed these images somewhat more than me, and therefore his judgment must given some weight.
UPDATE 2: Further analyses show Icke is essentially right. The approach clearly looks odd, but this is explained by the very odd perspective. The diagram below shows the path is basically on target for the entry spot. Two black lines represent a 3D continuation of the tower, and clearly the south wall is quite a bit lower than the east and north walls.
Definitely a cautionary note for some of the plane path claims I have been making here. I will have to go back and re-analyze some of them. However I am quite confident that the other videos I have been analyzing do not have such an extreme perspective.
UPDATE 3 (12/28/08): Looking at this again, I think while my 2 updated analysis still basically holds, there is still a problem with the actual trajectory of the plane: it is coming in at an ascending angle rather than flat or slightly descending angle (with respect to the tower), as most videos show. Note the plane path line is not parallel to the line on the tower from the mechanical floors-- the plane is on an ascent with respect to the hitting the right spot on the tower.
posted by spooked at 4:26 PM
2 Comments:
Even if the "plane" "should" look like it's bellyflopping (which it does to me), the Naudet 2nd Hit vid remains anomalous for at least two other reasons:
1. Gedeon Naudet's POST-Hit TILT-DOWN:
http://911foreknowledge.com/n2hit.htm
and
2. the ALTERATION of the clip by cutting out something in the middle:
http://www.911hoax.com/gNaudetWTC1_9.asp?intPage=46&PageNum=46
aka
http://tinyurl.com/5h9bw
Ray Ubinger
Yes, no doubt about that, Ray!
I was mostly saying how the angle looks very strange, but it appears to be an optical illusion.
Post a Comment
<< Home