Sobering
Though their reasons why the towers couldn't have been taken down by demolition are crap, if one takes time to look over the body of work NIST has put together, it is very impressive and sobering.
Sobering in the sense that a lot of apparently smart people have done what appears to be a lot of hard work to support a big lie-- both in terms of the "planes" and in terms of the tower "collapses". How they were misled is not clear. I have to wonder how many of the actual scientists had doubts about their conclusions. Were all of them duped or brainwashed somehow? Or were they all in on the cover-up? Or were some scientists suspicious but were over-ridden by evil superiors?
They clearly did fairly high-tech modeling of planes and the buildings, but they never show how much they had to tweak the models to get the "official results". Certainly their worst-case scenarios are the only ones that seem to come close to cuasing collapses but they never bother to model the complete collapses of the structures themselves.
All in all, it is hard to have great confidence in their work.
Still, it is very sobering to see SO MUCH work put into this.
Sobering in the sense that a lot of apparently smart people have done what appears to be a lot of hard work to support a big lie-- both in terms of the "planes" and in terms of the tower "collapses". How they were misled is not clear. I have to wonder how many of the actual scientists had doubts about their conclusions. Were all of them duped or brainwashed somehow? Or were they all in on the cover-up? Or were some scientists suspicious but were over-ridden by evil superiors?
They clearly did fairly high-tech modeling of planes and the buildings, but they never show how much they had to tweak the models to get the "official results". Certainly their worst-case scenarios are the only ones that seem to come close to cuasing collapses but they never bother to model the complete collapses of the structures themselves.
All in all, it is hard to have great confidence in their work.
Still, it is very sobering to see SO MUCH work put into this.
posted by spooked at 11:29 PM
2 Comments:
right. it took NIST 5 years and 10k pages to conclude that the towers collapsed because they were hit by planes and caught on fire. they disregard entirely the fact that the towers' concrete was turned into powder at the same time that the perimeter columns were being expelled outwards thus could not have contributed their weight onto the floors below.
----
professor karjanmaa shows the NIST inadequacy:
NIST & the WTC
tom gordon shows in a single page the order in which the towers would have to be demolished:
How the Towers were Demolished
prof. wood shows that the explanations of the collapse that have been given by the 9/11 Commission Report and NIST are not physically possible:
BILLIARD BALL EXAMPLE
----
it would seem that NIST has a lot of explaining to do but i am not holding my breath.
oops!
HOW THE TOWERS WERE DEMOLISHED
was not the work of tom gordon, but rather gordon ross.
my apologies to both gordons.
Post a Comment
<< Home