Saving Lower Manhattan
Judy Wood and Morgan Reynolds have put together some fascinating evidence about the demolition of the WTC.
Unfortunately, the article isn't finished yet, but the idea seems to be that beam weapons were used to disintegrate the top of the WTC so that the impact of the massive weight of the WTC buildings wouldn't destroy lower Manhattan with a large earthquake.
The most compelling evidence for this theory is that the seismic signal for the WTC collapses was MUCH SMALLER than it should have been.
There are also some very striking images of perfectly rounded holes in WTC5 and WTC6, apparent evidence of the beam.
If you think this is all sheer craziness, there's probably not much anyone can say to you at this point.
But I highly recommend everyone read this amazing article on exotic weapons systems by Leurent Moret.
Unfortunately, the article isn't finished yet, but the idea seems to be that beam weapons were used to disintegrate the top of the WTC so that the impact of the massive weight of the WTC buildings wouldn't destroy lower Manhattan with a large earthquake.
The most compelling evidence for this theory is that the seismic signal for the WTC collapses was MUCH SMALLER than it should have been.
There are also some very striking images of perfectly rounded holes in WTC5 and WTC6, apparent evidence of the beam.
If you think this is all sheer craziness, there's probably not much anyone can say to you at this point.
But I highly recommend everyone read this amazing article on exotic weapons systems by Leurent Moret.
5 Comments:
And you're back to death rays again.
Stop playing video games, Spook. They're warpong your sense of reality.
well it would seem that these cars were indeed death-rayed!
Figure 4(a): Unexplained spontaneous combustion toasted cars in a lot near the WTC.
no way! that was caused by the incredible heat of the kerosene (jet-fuel) fires reflecting off your tin-foil underpants!
well what about these cars?
Figure 4(e): What burned and dragged these cars and mangled the left rear wheel?
ditto! besides if we ignore that phenomenon then it's as if it never really happened!
-------
hey sword, it appears that you are the one with a warponged sense of reality.
i think the buildings were nuked and the cars were toasted from the nukes...and so does this guy:
http://www.saunalahti.fi/wtc2001/evidence.htm
beyond the mini-nukes at WTC, indeed some high-tech/black technology was probably used...but as Gerard Holmgren (no-planer) says, the perps would have tried to keep things as simple/least messy as possible..."less is more"...
"nuked?" and just where is the high level radiation readings then?
We have sufficient evidence to indicate that "molecular dissociation" occurred at Ground Zero, which indicates the use of some unknown form of powerful exotic weaponry.
PS: Pay no attention to that false-logic "high level radiation readings" nuke-dismissing disinfo. Steven Jones is a proven liar (see link); and that nuke-dismissing disinfo consists of sound logic which is based upon Steven Jones' reality-ignoring lie -- a fission device is NOT required to trigger a fusion reaction.
So, how many times do we have to catch the government lying about 9/11 before we stop believing the government about 9/11?
And, how many times do we have to catch BYU physics professor Steven Jones PhD lying about 9/11 (and physics) before we stop believing Steven Jones about 9/11 (and physics)?
Baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.
Post a Comment
<< Home