South Tower Mystery
Anonymous said...
the second plane/south tower is a total mind-f*cker...how did the Perps pull this one off? cause i've met people who know people who claim they "saw" the second plane "with their own eyes"...perhaps they saw the explosion from the opposite side and assumed it was a plane...we know some kind of aircraft hit the North tower (too many credible witnesses, plus Naudet video), but WTF happened to the South Tower?
I'm not convinced a plane hit or didn't hit...right now i'm leaning towards a missile with
Psy-Op/Media brainwashing of the "plane" meme...with possible other explosives in the building to create the "plane impact" illusion...
12:49 PM
Indeed-- the South tower hit is a major mind-fucker. It's what has kept me wondering, for almost a year now, what the hell happened. A real plane doesn't make sense, nor does total CGI. The best I can figure is a non-conventional high-tech plane that was seen by many people and not seen at some angles and therefore was recreated by CGI. Not clear how many videos actually saw a plane. And why did many videos show a smaller misshapen plane instead of a 767? Was this a CGI mistake or a built-in smoking gun or did the videos show something real?
I like the idea that a smaller version of the Star Wars beam weapon was used to create the plane shaped holes. This could explain the WTC and Pentagon. But what created the freaky plane-imprint in Pennsylvania?
posted by spooked at 8:19 AM
3 Comments:
How about a backhoe? Remember there's grass growing in the hole (at least I think they said that in Loose Change.)
Spooked, I think you're getting too into the whole beam weapon idea. It makes sense to finish off the WTC but not to dig a hole in Shanksville or knock over lampposts.
Also, regarding the 2nd hit: take a look at a cruise missle. The thing has wings. I'm sure that for the casual observer it looks like a plane. But I think you could simply have a drone plane hit, say a 727, and then blow up, solving the debris problem.
The CGI fakery would then be limited to blurring or obscuring the video so that it couldn't be conclusively proved to be one type of drone or another. They just wouldn't want anyone to be able to see the video too clearly.
Fred
A couple more thoughts on the scar: you can't really see much of anything in there, except Edna C. No computers, no desks... so here's a thought: there could be a ton of plane debris from the drone or whatever it was, but it's further back in there on the other side of the floor and we just can't see in there that far past all the debris that is visible. Also, maybe some of the heavy stuff fell through the floors and it's all wedged in there a couple of floors below the scar?
I just can't see very far into the scar to say what's hiding in there and what's not. Remember those floors are pretty big.
Fred
A couple more thoughts on the scar: you can't really see much of anything in there, except Edna C. No computers, no desks... so here's a thought: there could be a ton of plane debris from the drone or whatever it was, but it's further back in there on the other side of the floor and we just can't see in there that far past all the debris that is visible. Also, maybe some of the heavy stuff fell through the floors and it's all wedged in there a couple of floors below the scar?
I just can't see very far into the scar to say what's hiding in there and what's not. Remember those floors are pretty big.
Fred
Post a Comment
<< Home