Still Amazes Me
that Hani Hanjour brought the 757 in just inches (millimeters?) off the ground without scraping the Pentagon lawn:
Still not sure how he hopped over the 6 foot high cable spools though:
And I really don't know how he managed to bust the fuselage of the plane though this set of windows and leave the window divider behind-- not to mention how he managed to crash the plane into the wall without the 25 foot tail breaking the windows above the hole.
Ah, well-- I guess the IMPORTANT thing is that Hani and his pals managed to trick the Bush administration into invading Iraq!
Still not sure how he hopped over the 6 foot high cable spools though:
And I really don't know how he managed to bust the fuselage of the plane though this set of windows and leave the window divider behind-- not to mention how he managed to crash the plane into the wall without the 25 foot tail breaking the windows above the hole.
Ah, well-- I guess the IMPORTANT thing is that Hani and his pals managed to trick the Bush administration into invading Iraq!
posted by spooked at 7:06 AM
15 Comments:
Maybe they used this?
http://photos1.blogger.com/x/blogger/5585/2633/1600/245242/deathray.jpg
i've read the Afghanistan "conflict" had to do with CIA drug operations (and just maybe that Unocal pipeline?)...golden triangle, golden crescent, etc...it's also rumored the CIA uses money from it's drug trade to fund black ops...how about
false-flag, state terror Psy-Ops?
Wow,anonymous death ray man, you have just shown that you have no factual response whatsoever, and can only mock with an unrelated picture.
You should understand that by posting here with such garbage, I assume that you are conceding the truth of what is being said by Spooked.
I assume that you are conceding the truth of what is being said by Spooked.
every time the sword of conspiracy pinchers fail to address an actual point of contention or an issue at hand in favor of their preferred tactic of continuing childish ridicule or distraction it can only mean that they are indeed conceding the truth of what is being said.
Couldn't agree with you more. Instead of adding to some serious discussion like "No, this is what I believe is shown here" ... it's more like "You guys are stupid. We're laughing at you." They nothing meaningful to the debate, not even as a spokesperson for "the official story."
ya, not once has any of them ever actually supported much less defended a single aspect of the govt/media 9/11 fairytale - if even one of them believed any of it he or she would not hesitate to attempt rubbing our noses in it. the collective silence speaks volumes.
It's not much yet, but it's the start of a video -- 9/11 Octopus Media Perps (unreleased). I'll dress it up with some music or voiceover in the next couple of days.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kbbuQgQI-7I
I guess we should devote 20 seconds to fake blogs like Conswordacy Pincher, huh.
Fred
I think what CS and Pincher are doing is not any worse than what Manuel Garcia did it in Counterpunch with his "Physics of 9/11" article. I just posted something on my blog about this, and will summarize it here.
My conclusion is that Garcia is a fancier version of 4th-grader commenters -- he uses intellectual snobbery to hide his tautological reasoning that assumes what he purports to prove.
Manuel Garcia, Conspiracy Smasher's big brother that went to college.
Fred, great start on a great video. May I suggest the words -- "Buildings don't swallow planes" or "Real planes don't slip into buildings like that" or something to that effect, after the video showing that and after the ABC video saying "it swalloed the plane."
I'm not sure I got the octopus metaphor -- is it slimy creatures with their tentacles in everything spraying inky lies in our faces?
yeah, here's the new video.
Added a lot more in of various stealth technology... including a lot of octopus style active camouflage.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-696990552796252094&hl=en
I think it's a lot more watchable now and has a lot of interesting stuff in the second half.
You could safely skip the story about the dentist and rumsfeld's goofy "cave" story and watch the last 8 minutes or so.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-696990552796252094&hl=en
Hi Fred. I like the new and improved one, but the background music is a bit loud so it's hard to hear the words. Can you fade it out when there is speech? I find the first song a bit irritating, to be honest, but it does have the right mood. Maybe a lower volume it will be perfect.
Some of your words have to be left up longer, I think, for impact. I could barely finish the one ending "susceptibilities," and I read fast; plus you want to give people a little time to consider what they have read before moving on.
hey CS,
there's no weapons/lasers in space, eh? rumsfeld's behind the "star wars" project...
http://www.space4peace.org/
This is nonsense:
http://911myths.com/html/pentagon_rings_and_the_exit_ho.html
The first part about distance is completely irrelevant. The second part about wall thickness does not show how the plane got through 6 walls, one of which was reinforced concrete and would absorb a great deal of the kinetic energy. Before reaching the last brick wall, the path goes through 5 walls of 10-inch concrete. Reinforced or not, that is a lot of resistance, and the corridor between the 2nd and 3rd rings would likely divert the path to the right.
Show me the was an engine and I will consider it. Fuselage? No way.
Nothing else I see at 911myths is particularly worth responding to - mainly straw men.
"Nothing else I see at 911myths is particularly worth responding to - mainly straw men."
I mean the Pentagon section.
From 2011
Apparently he was a landscaper by trade.
Post a Comment
<< Home