Marcus Icke on Holograms
from an email he sent to me and I quote with his permission:
My theory is many people who thought they saw the 2nd plane actually saw the helicopter that was going in the same direction as "UA175". People who actually saw a large jet hit the WTC are either lying or saw the fly-by "elephant" plane and got confused.
Holograms come from Webfairy and then to Dr Grossmann and then to me when he hosted my my Ghost Gun site.While sloppily typed, his basic point is reasonable. Unless we can show that all witnesses to the 2nd plane are bogus (even though it is quite likely they are bogus), we can't rule out a small (unconventional) plane or hologram.
Dr Grossmann did the serious research into it and showed it was a possibiltiy.
At the present time I see that the only evidensce [sic] regarding the WTC2 strike is to do with the media hoax.
Because the videos are fakes it would cover any potential hologram, so we can take holgrams no furter [sic] than theory and are left with media fakery evidence.
As time goes on it appear that the witnesses are liars and in fact did not witness anything - or so it seem [sic].
Unitil [sic] the majortity [sic] of the witnesses are de-bunked I would still consider a small plane or hologram at WTC2, and it looks like its [sic] heading that way.
I have recenty changed the title of the GGUA175 article to "The WTC2 Media Hoax" and left the hologram stuff at the end as a theory.
M. I.
My theory is many people who thought they saw the 2nd plane actually saw the helicopter that was going in the same direction as "UA175". People who actually saw a large jet hit the WTC are either lying or saw the fly-by "elephant" plane and got confused.
posted by spooked at 9:51 AM
1 Comments:
There seem to have been plenty of flying things up around the WTC, most of them hidden. I'm not sure why people think holograms don't exist. They've been around since long before I was born.
You don't "need" holograms to have a distraction to convince some people they saw a plane. A simple fly-by would probably work fine, even without camouflage (I suppose that even the idiot shill Pinch-of-Truth-Sword Smashereno will have to admit that the military uses camouflage.) Most people will see the plane, and then look away at the big pretty giant fireball. Since the faked videos are a proven fact, as well as the fake evidence from Shanksville, there's no need to figure out exactly how they did the plane distraction, but nothing wrong with trying, either.
Fake video, fake eyewitnesses, fake evidence at the crime scenes. In addition we have so many instances of the Bush Administration lying that there's no need to speculate that they might be telling the truth about anything.
Fred
Post a Comment
<< Home