Humint Events Online: The Excuse of Last Resort for Supporters of the Official 9/11 Story, Part 2

Monday, February 05, 2007

The Excuse of Last Resort for Supporters of the Official 9/11 Story, Part 2

Well, no one has ever seen a Boeing 767 going 500 gazillion miles per hour hitting a 110-story building before, so who knows what it should look like!!!

9 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

i know what it SHOULDN'T look like!
"sqwee! i'm going 500+ mph!"

6:51 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It's Casper 175!

7:22 PM  
Blogger blin said...

the legacy": a comedy of terrors
Gripping new E-novel that illustrates exactly how the ridiculous becomes sublime.
Free to read.
www.myspace.com/thelegacyacomedyofterrors

9:27 PM  
Blogger Unknown said...

One thing some of us DO know is that the Disinfo Agents & other shills are far superior to 97% of 9/11 Truth Seekers, when it comes to rhetorical, forensic skills and debate.

It's really pathetic that so few Truth Seekers know how to effectively handle the propaganda and disinfo that is posted 24/7 at sites such as the Orwellian-named "DU", by such lights as "Lared", "Boloboffin" (who probably thinks his intel insider "joke" about being an actor is cute), and the rest of the Daisy Committee.

The above totally dominate every thread posted at DU. Just because
the disgusting people that operate DU are stealth neocons doesn't mean that COMPETENT posters can't either:

1. Simply not respond to them about anything.

2. Acquire at least SOME basic debating/forensic skills and USE them to CONTROL/DOMINATE at least their own threads, if they can't purge the urge to respond to Disinfo Agents.

3. Learn how to spell or use a spell checker and learn the difference between and correct usage of words like "your", "you're", "there", "their"
and other such common words that the Disinfo Agents regularly use to mock posters and avoid the substance of a message.

4. STOP saying things that aren't accurate and can thus be used as the basis for undermining points.
Details are important in "battle".

Truth is, it's arrogant to think one is entitled to go toe to toe with one's superiors - and the Disinfo Agents ARE superior in their forensic skills, attention to detail, and ability to dominate discussions that they can't deflect or otherwise disrupt.
3.

11:13 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

the Disinfo Agents ARE superior in their forensic skills, attention to detail, and ability to dominate discussions that they can't deflect or otherwise disrupt.

individuals or committees the likes of which early wynn refers to rarely make an appearance on the comment pages of this particular blog.
and it seems to be forensic skills and attention to detail that defeats them when they do appear.

12:00 AM  
Blogger Unknown said...

Wow, "democrat" - Anytime someone drops a line or two or three using the phrase "no planers", it makes me wonder where they're coming from.

Are YOU willing to step up to the plate and say whether YOU are convinced that actual planes crashed into the WTC, the Pentagon, and at Shanksville?

Go ahead. If you're a PLANER, say so. Oh, and if you have any evidence to support being a PLANER, lay it on us.

Thanks.

7:40 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"I haven't seen a major hologram fit to impersonate a full Boeing 767,"

Who said anything about holograms?

10:33 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"I'd rather have many people with a slight sense of difficulties with the official 911 story and a clear focus on the general picture (War with Iran next?, financial cliff ahead) than a hardcore set of 'no-planers' and a large pool of people scared off by ultimate 911 conspiracy theories."

So would the perps. Most Americans have more than a slight sense of difficulties with the JFK assassination, but they don't KNOW the government did it. Having it widely suspected is OK, having it widely known is not.

10:37 PM  
Blogger Unknown said...

"democrat" said:

"We saw a plane on the 2nd hit coverage on TV.."

No, "we" didn't. What "we" saw was fakery/cartoons.

If you don't understand why it's important to know whether or not commercial airliners (or any other kind of aircraft, for that matter) crashed into the WTC, the Pentagon, and at Shanksville, then I for one, am very very skeptical about any of the "opinions" you express about 9/11.

Really, anyone that wants to read about the viewpoints of those that claim to have questions about the Official Story, but nevertheless suuport it for the most part...can surf on over to the D...isgusting U
and gorge on a feast of variations on a theme of OCT.

3:13 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Powered by Blogger