"Ghostplane" Video Poll at DU
for those interested.
66% said it was real.
19% said they were unsure.
16% said it was a computer animation.
Only 32 votes, and this was on the 9/11 baord, which is crawling with official story supporters. But there is some discussion of why people think it is real, anyway.
66% said it was real.
19% said they were unsure.
16% said it was a computer animation.
Only 32 votes, and this was on the 9/11 baord, which is crawling with official story supporters. But there is some discussion of why people think it is real, anyway.
posted by spooked at 7:32 AM
6 Comments:
here is a link from one of the comments at the DU ghostplane poll:
http://www.questionsquestions.net/WTC/175speed.html
this link purports that what we see in one of the videos is NOT out of the ordinary simply because there WAS deceleration observed.
as if. even if deceleration WAS observed, and i don't believe that it was, there are many other aspects of this and the many other images of what was alleged to be ua175 that indicate ghostplane-video fakery.
here is a much better analyses of the same video clip/image of ua175:
http://www.911research.dsl.pipex.com/ggua175/fairbanks/
ha.
i am unable to comment at DU or i would post this comment there.
lune
a
tic
If you know or have a hunch about whether or not the members of the Daisy Committee at DU work DIRECTLY with the DU moderator aka Lithos, is it your opinion (or knowledge) that they recommend to Lithos which messages should be deleted and who should be banned from there.
I'm currently a member of DU, but I'm concerned about how to avoid being banned and how to re-register in a way that won't "trigger" Lithos to get out his "Ban Gun" and do a number on me. Does his "Ban Gun" contain a ISP detector? Is THAT how he does it?
Not only would there be much greater kinetic energy loss = deceleration in a real impact, but NIST itself says 0% deceleration in the Scott Myers video.
http://ningens-blog.blogspot.com/2007/01/does-nist-prove-no-planes-and-has-jones.html
Early--
the Daisy committee clearly works with Lithos, and the surest way to get banned is to bring up anything related to anti-semitism or the holocaust. I never talk about these things and have had no trouble with the mods at DU.
I'm sure the mods can detect ISPs/IP#s in order to keep someone banned.
--spooked
Thanks, Spooked. I appreciate it.
Post a Comment
<< Home