The Far Side of the Moon
While I guess I learned this a long time back, the significance never really struck me before: the moon's rotation is such that one side of the moon can never be seen from earth?*
Here is a picture of the "far side of the moon" (which is different from the "dark side of the moon"):
What's the deal with that striped, almost grid-like, pattern?
Is that mind-blowing or what?
Here's a different pic of the far-side from NASA which doesn't show that lined pattern:
*This phenomenon is apparently explained by the process of "tidal locking".
And here is some really strange stuff about the moon.
Here is a picture of the "far side of the moon" (which is different from the "dark side of the moon"):
What's the deal with that striped, almost grid-like, pattern?
Is that mind-blowing or what?
Here's a different pic of the far-side from NASA which doesn't show that lined pattern:
*This phenomenon is apparently explained by the process of "tidal locking".
And here is some really strange stuff about the moon.
posted by spooked at 12:36 PM
8 Comments:
You're right about this! Based on my study of videos found on YouTube, I believe that the moon is being held in place (probably by a force field machine) so evidence of alien intrusion can be hidden.
We all know the Illuminatti are in control of the One World Government and the MSM. Methinks what we cannot see on the moon would stir the populace to revolt against our alien masters - hence the force field.
You are correct! It is because of the force field machines that are located in darkest Peru that the moon remains in place. These force fields are causing stretch marks on the far side.
Just because there is no PROOF of these force fields means nothing. They are there - there is no other explanation of why the moon does not zoom off into the cosmos - like my brain did so long ago.
this is called synchronous rotation and it happens because the moon orbits the earth in the same amount of time as the moon rotates on its axis, in ~28 days. for each orbit the moon makes around the earth, the moon has rotated once on its axis whereas for each orbit the earth makes around the sun, the earth has rotated ~365 times on its axis.
hardly an exciting fact about moon once you realize why it happens, but plenty of people think the 'dark side of the moon' is a pink floyd thing only.
try this on for size: the moon is 400 times smaller than the sun but the sun is 400 times further away from the earth than the moon is. in other words, the sun is 400 times further away from the earth than the moon, but the moon is 400 times smaller than the sun. and this is why, from the earth, the moon and the sun appear the same size in the sky. might not be exciting until you see a total eclipse and realize that on any other planet in the solar system, a satellite would not appear to completely the sun-- except on earth. the sun and the moon appear exactly the same size when viewed from earth.
fintan dunne, from that "unreliable 'conspiracy site' that deals with 9/11" known as breakfornews.com calls this the solar/lunar equivalence. mainstream science has dismissed the solar/lunar equivalence as a fascinating coincidence, and act which dunne has rightly claimed may be "the biggest error science error made".
those are nice photos of the other side of the moon.
h.
spooked, I think those lines are the result of how that picture was taken.
It's probably several thin strips of film taken as the satillite travels in a North-South/South-North orbit and then lining up the strips to make a composite picture of the whole moon.
The Mars Global Surveyor also used this technique to obtain the high resolution pictures of Mars.
I gained new respect for Fintan Dunne hearing his interview with Jim Fetzer. His take on 9/11 as an operation of G8 elites, with the neocons as the patsies, and with the purpose of demoralizing the American people and destroying our constitutional government, makes some sense to me.
I wish he wouldn't talk abut weird shit, but that's separate.
cheers ningen! dunne distanced himself from many researchers when he unleashed his CIA fakes list. i don't agree with every site mentioned on the list and i think it's important to remember dunne isn't directly claiming each site is a CIA fake. as i understand it, CIA fakes are any site pushing stories (knowing or unknowingly) from the CIA, or 'useful idiots' too, which i believe fetzer is. i don't know what interview you listened to re: fetzer and fintan but both are archived in breakfornews forums, and well worth a listen. fintan's 9/11 without tinfoil series is a good listen as well. just remember dunne uses the term CIA as shorthand for any intel agency.
dunne didn't list covertoperations as a CIA fake in his list, but he did drop the name of spooked's blog on one of his shows. specifically, if i recall, dunne's beef was an old leading title on spooked's blog (rogue group responsible for 9/11.. something something, i cannot recall what spooked used to have). nonetheless, i know dunne isn't the most popular guy, but he's not trying to be either.
is dunne not spot on about alex jones and the temple of doom? was he not the first to drop the cold fusion/steven jones connection?
"I wish he wouldn't talk abut weird shit, but that's separate."
weird is a relative term, no? just 2 cents from an anonymous troll.
Thank you for this article, really useful material.
Post a Comment
<< Home