Humint Events Online: How Could the Government Cover-Up 9/11 When They Couldn't Even Cover Up the Watergate Break-in?

Thursday, April 05, 2007

How Could the Government Cover-Up 9/11 When They Couldn't Even Cover Up the Watergate Break-in?

What an incredibly ignorant comment.

This is a common line of thought, though.

I recently saw this on the Popular Mechanics site on Rosie O'Donnel and WTC7-- "How could the Bush administration cover-up 9/11 when they couldn't even cover-up the firing of US attorneys?"


I've seen this sort of thing repeated before: "How could the Bush administration cover-up 9/11 when they couldn't even cover-up (insert another Bush scandal here)?"

It's merely worth pointing out that some governmental crimes are more important to cover-up than others. And there are obviously times when it is in the interest of both political parties and the media and everyone else in power to maintain the cover-up.

In fact, it tends to be that the more trivial the scandal, the more likley it is to come to light.

9/11 is simply too monstrous a crime for there not to be a huge cover-up.

And by now, almost EVERYONE in DC is implicated in it, by their very silence on the topic. Not that they were directly involved in 9/11. But they are guilty of covering it up from the very beginning.

14 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

ignorance is bliss!

10:50 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

And you clowns are the most blissful people on earth!

4:06 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

oh you are surely intelligent enough to set us poor clowns straight so please do enlighten us !

5:56 PM  
Blogger Conspiracy Smasher said...

"almost EVERYONE in DC is implicated in it, by their very silence on the topic. Not that they were directly involved in 9/11. But they are guilty of covering it up from the very beginning."

Maybe the stupidest thing you have ever said on your blog (and that in itself is a statement...)

The sad thing is, you haven't a clue as to why your statement is stupid. I truly hope you're not raising children...

6:12 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

""you haven't a clue""

oh excellent rebuttal!
however, you forgot to say anything that pertains to 9/11.
it's almost as if you don't really believe the official govt/media 9/11 fairytale any more than the rest of us do.
conspiracy smasher!

7:44 PM  
Anonymous conspiracy smasher said...

conspiracy: n. pl. -cies. 1. the act of conspiring. 2. a group (19 perhaps?) of conspirators.

7:52 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

This is kind of fun. Totovader is promoting my website, and so is 911 conspiracy smasher. Thanks for the pimpage, dudes. All publicity is good publicity and you're waking thousands of new people up to the fact that 9/11 was a engineered by the bush regime.

My message is even more effective when smart people AND stupid people AND shills all work together to post links to my videos. Keep it up!


Fred

4:30 AM  
Blogger Conspiracy Smasher said...

Fred - the Forrest Gump of the 9/11 movement...

6:03 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

terrence - the jerry's kid of the official govt 9/11 fairytale pretenders...

10:24 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Found this on another blog:

"Somehow the stupidest man on the face of the earth, who can hardly keep a single national security secret out of the editorial page of the NY Times succeeded in pulling off the most devastating attack on US soil and other than conjecture, no one has leaked anything.

One would also think that if he could pull that off, you'd think we would have 'found' some WMDs in Iraq."

Of course Spooky and his minions swill just ignore this, and (as in the post above) claim that EVERYONE in DC (worldwide media included) is in on this and that not ONE person would leak this because "it is so important".

That DOES have to be the stupidest thing ever written on this blog.

5:06 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

don't let the spooks and shills intimidate, harass, or threaten...they WILL deride, they WILL snicker...that's what COINTEL operatives do...it's a tactic they learned in Spook School...

1:45 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Spook School....unfortunately it was an 8:30 am class so I usually slept thru it, borrowed notes and crammed for the final.

5:10 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

""Of course Spooky and his minions swill just ignore this,""

oh good one @5:06!
actually what i will do is ask you to explain why the media has ignored the fact that wtc7 fell conveniently into it's own footprint in only 7 seconds time and why the media has also ignored silverstein's admission that it was "pulled".

of course you and the rest of the little pinchays will just ignore this...

11:00 AM  
Blogger Spooked said...

Of course Spooky and his minions swill just ignore this, and (as in the post above) claim that EVERYONE in DC (worldwide media included) is in on this and that not ONE person would leak this because "it is so important".


Actually, I haven't ignored those "points"-- I have covered all of those issues multiple times on this site, if you'd care to peruse the archives. Basically, I don't think Bush was directly behind 9/11. I think he had little to do with it. As far as WMD, the more important issue is how most people in the US have been either brainwashed to think there WERE WMD found in Iraq, or that they don't care that WMD weren't found in Iraq.

2:12 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Powered by Blogger