Since We Know That Government Shills Monitor This Site Every Day
and none of them have responded to this post, we can only assume that they tacitly admit that the 2nd hit footage is faked-- and that no conventional aircraft hit the south WTC tower.
posted by spooked at 11:13 AM
24 Comments:
I think you should start a thread like this one, on the DU 9/11 forum.
DU has a large number of members that are ignorant of the evidence which proves that 9/11 was orchestrated by the U.S. Government, not OBL - and by posting this on DU, you get a "two for your money" return:
1. You can get your message communicated to a large number of people.
2. Those same people will have a good opportunity to see how the Gov't Shills try to keep the lid on the truth thru deflection (MFerds, Dithers et al.), sarcasm (Boilio), pseudo science (Lareds), limited hangouts (HRice, JRiddler), appeals to stupidity (Laurier aka Jazz2006), censorship (Lithos), outrageous BS (Kingshockalocka), feigned phoniness (Len Swatalski aka greyl), and all the rest.
good point S, and i agree.
no doubt one will poke it's little pinched head up before long but when one does that one will most certainly not address the fakery issue.
or any other real 9/11 issue either.
h.
"Since We Know That Government Shills Monitor This Site Every Day
and none of them have responded to this post, we can only assume that they tacitly admit that the 2nd hit footage is faked"
The reality is that you have a handful (at most) of viewers to this blog. Why would we care?
StillDiggin has a new post on the fake planes.
http://911logic.blogspot.com/2007/04/earth-is-not-flat.html
""The reality is that you have a handful (at most) of viewers to this blog. Why would we care? ""
~shill
we don't expect you to care.
we know what the score is as surely as we know what is not the truth; (official govt 9/11 fairytale)
it is not about the immediate.
To claim that nobody is refuting bullshit means everyone believes that bullshit is...bullshit.
That post of yours that "discusses" the WTC impacts and the F-4 impact lost any and all attempts at credibility when you typed the line " "APPARENT" SIMILARITIES BETWEEN THESE TWO DATA POINTS:". There is nothing "apparent" about the 3 points you "apparently" list - they are statements of fact - there is nothing "apparent" about them.
Further, you compare aircraft destruction where one slams into a slab of concrete 12 feet thick and where one slams into a skyscraper wall made up of prodominantly glass and 18" wide steel beams.
Further, you say "the F4 looks real, "UA175" looks cartoonish", which is not a statement of fact but rather a statement of belief on yoru part. To anyone with even a tenuous grasp on reality the UA 175 impact with the tower looks exactly what one would expect when an airliner hits a predominantly glass and steel-beamed wall at 500 knots.
Your post has gathered no rebuttals because it is bullshit and shill (above) nails it when he says why should we care?
BTW, go read Seeing the Unseen, Part 2 at http://www.ejectejecteject.com/
shill, i personally visit this site as much as possible and i think SPOOKED does a great and courageous job...if S-11 was an inside job, it WILL be exposed...all the PERPS, SPOOKS, and SHILLS will be brought to justice as well (if it's the last thing i do on Earth, many of us have made this our personal quest)...i don't care what you think or what you know or how many of us you monitor, all that matters is the truth...an informed public is a dangerous thing...grassroots media, public awareness, education...just like the anti-globalization movement which was steaming ahead, right until S-11...how very convenient for Wolfowitz, PNAC, IMF/World Bank/WTO...
oh nice try @10:25p!
however, the CNN image of ua175 entering the wtc2 as if it was casper the ghost is as ridiculous as it appears to be.
a real 767 is made of aluminum and has a smooth rounded plastic nosecone.
can you explain exactly how a smooth rounded plastic nosecone could pierce thru the massive steel/concrete of a wtc?
i say that you cannot, but please feel free to give it that old college try!
certainly your link: ejectejecteject.com does not even begin to address this phenomena.
if ANYONE thinks that they can show that even a single one of the images of alleged ua175 are authentic then please feel free to do so.
until then all of you should just fuck off.
h is for ha!
"until then all of you should just fuck off."
THAT'LL tell 'em, ha!
You really think "government shills" monitor this crap every day? What...do you think they are scared of you? That you are someone they need to keep an eye on?? That you represent some sort of threat?
Give it up, Spooky. You are nothing but a two-bit wacko-moonbat lunatic loser who has a blog - like 50 million other people in the world. Nobody cares about you nor your crazy ideas of Bush galactic domination. We like to come here, as I've said so many times before, because this is the funniest crap on the internet - and is getting funnier every day!
funnier every day!
"APPARENT" SIMILARITIES BETWEEN THESE TWO DATA POINTS:". There is nothing "apparent" about the 3 points you "apparently" list - they are statements of fact - there is nothing "apparent" about them.
BZZZT. Wrong.
These are the three things I said were apparently the same:
1) both planes are traveling similar speeds
2) both planes disintegrate as they crash
3) neither plane undergoes significant deceleration upon impact
These were reasonable assumptions, but were not readily verified facts. Therefore, they were "apparent" similarities.
That's basic logic.
And ""UA175" looks cartoonish" IS a fact.
FINALLY, AND MOST IMPORTANTLY, YOU DIDN'T REFUTE MY POINTS.
YOU LOSE.
Oh, HI Pinch!
""a skyscraper wall made up of prodominantly glass and 18" wide steel beams.""
prEdominantly glass?
as if.
Spooky,
"And ""UA175" looks cartoonish" IS a fact."
Perhaps if you spend you day watching cartoons you may think the impact is cartoonish. Those of us who live in the world of reality know that an airliner traveling at 500 knots hitting a wall made up of glass and 18" steel beams will indeed leave an impact hole such as was left.
You just go on back to your little Wile E Coyote world and laugh when your little Wile E Coyote runs into a wall or falls off a cliff and cry when your little Wile E Coyote tummy growls and you need something to eat.
AND I DIDN'T REFUTE YOUR POINTS BECAUSE YOUR POINTS ARE BULLSHIT.
""an airliner traveling at 500 knots hitting a wall made up of glass and 18" steel beams will indeed leave an impact hole such as was left.""
really pinch?
1 problem with your little fantasy is that the hole didn't show up until the explosion which didn't occur until well after the image of the plane had disappeared entirely into the image of the tower.
another problem with your little fantasy is that the cartoon-like plane shaped hole was too small to allow a real 767 to have passed entirely thru it - yet even you can see that none of it broke off on it's way in.
yet another problem with your little fantasy is the physics of it all - when you can honestly explain how a smooth rounded lightweight plastic/aluminum flying beer can that is a real 767 nosecone/fuselage could actually sever right thru the massive hardened steel/concrete that was the wtc instead of squashing like the flying beer can that it is then maybe you might be taken seriously.
and a 4th problem for your little fantasy is they all look like cartoons because they are cartoons.
look how stupid this one looks!
CNN 9/11 TV fakery
what gets funnier every day is that your very words give you away as not believing the official 9/11 fairytale any more than the rest of us do and yet you continue with the pretense that you do.
hit the road beetle bailey!
Hey, this is great. Can I have some of the drugs you're using? That way, my reality can be as warped as yours ...
Ha,
If you *still* don't know where I stand on this whole issue, you really are dumber than I could ever imagine.
Spooked's blog is great, and the shills don't know how to respond because they're always waiting to be told what to do next. It's really the only thing they know how to do: they sit around like Beavis and Butthead and wait for their orders.
Mindless drones, Smash, Reno, Swordpincher-- They never convince anyone. What a waste of a minimum wage. They've lost the war for pubic opinion already, now it's just a matter of time before they face justice.
Fred
The lack of slowing or disintegration as the plane PUNCHES THROUGH a strong obstacle suggests the plane is INVINCIBLE...
Yet, how can an invincible plane THEN disintegrate against the same material that it punches through?
What is bullshit about these points?
Perhaps Pinch could explain whether he thinks the plane disintegrated as it impacted or only after it penetrated...
a basic yet important issue.
pinch it is obvious that you don't believe the official 9/11 fairytale any more than the rest of us do.
now it is beer:30 here in conspiracyville and so i raise my cerveza to the pinch gang.
salud!
pinch, i hope we run into each other some day...cause i'm gonna knock your stinking teeth out, and leave you bleeding on the street...like the scumbag SPOOK/SHILL you are, then i'm gonna knock your scumbag SPOOK/SHILL friends/superiors' teeth out, as well...some day, i promise you...
sleep tight, spooks must DIE!
www.falseflagnews.com
new article on DIRECTED ENERGY in Forbes, by Matthew Swibel...
http://members.forbes.com/global/2007/0423/032.html
Post a Comment
<< Home