Straight In?
The "plane" shows no change in course as it slides into the tower-- there is absolutely no deviation from the entry trajectory.
There are only three ways to explain this:
1) the "plane" is disintegrating as it contacts the building
2) the "plane" encounters absolutely no resistance as it enters the tower and effectively acts like a hot knife cutting through butter
3) the plane is fake
Explanation 1 is clearly not the case, as there is not enough debris blowing backward and there is no explosion from the fuel that would be sprayed in all directions upon contact.
Explanation 2 is clearly not the case, as the "plane" apparently disintegrates in the tower, and butter cannot destroy a knife.
Explanation 3 must be true.
posted by spooked at 4:00 PM
17 Comments:
oh absolutely fake!
the front fuselage portion of a REAL 767 is nothing more than a giant flying beer can.
the front portion of a REAL 767 would squash against the side of the massive steel/concrete wtc like a beer can stomped beneath my clownshoe.
Spooked:
Wouldn't it be a good idea to post these two articles on the DU 9/11 forum? I sure THINK it would be.
So what if the paid SHILLS do their thing? THEY aren't the folks that need to be informed (since they are being paid BECAUSE of what we AND THEY know is the truth).
Pay no attention (NO attention) to them. It's like what all salespeople know: Don't worry about the competition. They aren't going to buy ANYTHING. Worry ONLY about those few prospects that MIGHT buy something after they've become educated about what you have to offer.
3 fake features of CNN ghostplane video
Great idea! Post this on DU, on Krazy Kos, on EVERY web page you can find! The more vehicles we can get this on the greater the bullshit we can fling at it!
Looking at a 3 second snippet of video and stating, categorically and without any reservation and with the Spook-trademarked 100% certainty, that the plane is a fake is bullshit because he is too dumb to understand the dynamics of an airliner traveling at 500 knots as it impacts a predominantly glass-fronted building.
Of COURSE the plane will break up as its momentum carries it through the facade of the building. Of COURSE the aircraft will not throw out significant debris "behind" it as it impacts - what part of 500 knots do you not understand? Of COURSE there was an explosion of fuel - look at the fucking video, moonbat. Of COURSE it disintegrates in the tower as it plows through the wall.
Jesus you people are moronic - hilarious, but moronic nonetheless.
OF COURSE a SHILL must do what a SHILL gets paid to do.
OF COURSE you know that we know that you don't believe what you're saying.
You're just doin' it for the pay.
""too dumb to understand the dynamics of an airliner traveling at 500 knots as it impacts a predominantly glass-fronted building""
the very words of pinch himself!
what did you guys copy off each other's papers in school? "psst - what did you get for #5?"
the wtc was NOT predominantly glass - it was NOT merely a facade.
it was made with massive hardened steel box columns set up with 2' space between them (for windows).
there was a 5' wide hardened steel belt (spandrel) that ran all the way around the perimeter of the wtc at every floor which was made of a giant concrete slab poured onto a giant metal tray with rebar reinforcement and fully tied into the even more massive hardened steel core columns.
""Of COURSE the plane will break up as its momentum carries it through the facade of the building""
you are wrong. a REAL 767 has a front fuselage made of thin lightweight aluminum sheet and a smooth rounded plastic nosecone - it nothing more than a big flying beer can which would squash up against the side of the wtc like the beer can that it is squashed beneath your ballet slipper.
""what part of 500 knots do you not understand?""
i understand the part where a 767 traveling @ 500 knots and striking a stationary massive steel wtc would exhibit the same physical dynamics and properties as a massive steel wtc traveling @ 500 knots and striking a stationary aluminum/plastic 767.
the aluminum/plastic of a REAL 767 would never pierce thru the side of the wtc.
""look at the fucking video, moonbat. Of COURSE it disintegrates in the tower as it plows through the wall.""
in what manner would a REAL aluminum/plastic lightweight 767 penetrate the massive steel/concrete wtc?
would it pierce it's way thru like an arrow?
or would it bludgeon it's way thru like a hammer?
YOU look at the videos dweeb.
wtc forensics
Early baby!
You keep mentioning something about me being paid!
Can you look into that? They must have lost my direct deposit slip cause I haven't gotten one cent yet!
I'd love a bit of that scratch! have them get on that and make sure I get my back pay!
And I'm still waiting for it to be posted on all these wonderful web sites!
Or perhaps you all don't really have the balls to do it - afraid of the derision and the piles of bullshit that will be flung.
Naw....just listen to ol' Early baby! He's the conscious of the Spook Doops - the so-called elder statesman, so to speak, if I read him right. Just listen to him and ignore the fact that the rest of the world know all of you as the idiotic lunatics you are - no planes, nuclear weapons, space-based laser beams, VT as a distraction.
The internet is great for this stuff, you know? Because each and every fucking one of you can remain hidden behind this screen. If you had to put your name to any of this bullshit, you'd never, ever ever do it. Go public? ha....bunch of spineless assholes.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=125x155041
Bunch of lying fucking firefighters! How much is Bushitler paying you guys! You'd let your own mother fry as long as you get your little payoff from Bushitler!
Liars! Every one of you! The WORLD knows no plane hit those towers! Liar, liar! Pants on fire!
Typical moron talking point catch-phrases at 5:37 AM!
Why don't you go ahead and describe the crash physics of an airline hitting the WTC?
If you really knew what you were talking about then it would be an easy thing for you to do!
it doesn't matter if any firefighters saw a plane hit either wtc or not.
CNN, FOX & ABC all showed us cartoon images on 9/11/01.
Does Pinch even realize that the facade of the south tower was composed of structural steel beams -- thick hardened steel beams that were supporting the 30 floors of building above them?
I'm not saying a 767 couldn't have penetrated the south tower facade, but I'm saying IF it penetrated as effortlessly and cleanly as it does in this video, the plane can't have totally disintegrated once inside, 540 mph or not. It's called basic physics.
As far as posting this on other sites, people have posted this all over. It doesn't mean that people will automatically wake out of their slumber and see how bogus 9/11 was-- BUT this footage has probably been as effective as ANYTHING out there in terms of getting people to realize 9/11 was a hoax.
As far as DU, I have given up posting there. It is a waste of my time. Time that I can use for better things than arguing with a bunch of fucking govt shills.
""I'm not saying a 767 couldn't have penetrated the south tower facade, but...""
I, on the other hand, AM saying that the front fuselage portion of a REAL 767 is constructed of thin lightweight aluminum with a smooth rounded lightweight plastic nosecone - it is nothing more than a giant flying beer can.
i say that it CANNOT penetrate the massive hardened steel box columns of the south tower WALL (not facade) no matter how fast it might have been going.
anyone who says that it really can should be prepared to explain exactly in what manner it can.
h is for ha.
The nosecone couldn't penetrate, no doubt, but I'm talking about over 100 tons of aluminum structure moving at high speed behind the nose cone. The body of the plane, while it would bend and vibrate and explode, wouldn't just crumple up on the facade.
the aluminum cladding on the face of the wtc was the facade. the wall was massive hardened steel columns.
yes the front portion of the fuselage would indeed crumple up on the face of the wtc just like a beer can. this crumpled wad of aluminum would then act as a cushion between the somewhat heavy but extremely brittle engines, maybe protecting the engines from shattering, although it is possible that each engine could miraculously hit exactly between 2 columns and between floors but this would be a miraculous coincidence indeed. when the engines came to an instantaneous halt against the wad of crumpled aluminum the momentum of the wings that carried the fuel would tear them off and an explosion of jetfuel would splash across the face of the wtc.
none of the plane would be inside the wtc at this point.
----
crashphysics.blogspot.com
911logic.blogspot.com
Post a Comment
<< Home