Humint Events Online: 2nd Plane Was Going Trans-Sonic Speed?

Wednesday, May 16, 2007

2nd Plane Was Going Trans-Sonic Speed?

I walked out of Tower One on 9/11/01 after we were hit and just in time to have United fly over my head into Tower Two. There was no damn conspiracy, if Rosie - or any of the other idiots promulgating this load of horsedip - had been there that day they would understand just what the destructive power of those planes was like. People on my (low) floor fell down when we were hit because the building moved so far before whipping back. The second plane that hit Tower Two was very likely going at or near transonic speed when it hit the Tower simply based upon the sound that it made passing over us immediately prior to hitting the building. You don’t want to know what the sound was like when it hit the building Rosie, just be glad you weren’t there and stop peddling such garbage.

"I walked out of Tower One on 9/11/01 after we were hit and just in time to have United fly over my head into Tower Two."

That's a good trick, considering where the south tower was hit on the far side of where the north tower would be.

"...simply based upon the sound that it made passing over us immediately prior to hitting the building"

If it was going "trans-sonic speed", wouldn't it be quiet passing over his head right before it hit?

"You don’t want to know what the sound was like when it hit the building..."

Perhaps you could give some sort of description for us?


I posted a comment at that piece about Rosie O'Donnell and 9/11, but it seems they stopped taking comments... :(

UPDATE: They started adding more comments sometime last night and now mine is there. See if you can find it!

As predicted, lots of people using the freeway overpass collapse as an argument for the official story. As usual, lots of people saying conspiracy theorists are nuts and stupid. Lots of people using the same tired arguments that Bush admin is too incompetent too do 9/11. But it seems as though the "truth" crowd started getting stronger towards the end.

As far as trans-sonic-- that means speed of sound-- about 769 mph. Obviously no commercial aircraft was going that fast. Did he hear a sonic boom? Or just an explosion? Or two explosions...

Really, what makes most sense is that this guy never saw the plane, was in the plaza after the south tower was hit and heard the explosion over him, thought it was the plane making a sonic boom-- and then he saw the explosion.

Of course, the tower swaying hardly proves an airplane hit.

I just thought this trans-sonic thing was interesting. I never heard that description of the 2nd plane before.


Anonymous Anonymous said...

trans-sonic - that's the best one yet - it would have made big trans-sonic SPLAT! against the side of the tower if a real 767 had really been travelling at a trans-sonic speed and really hit the tower!

7:00 PM  
Anonymous conspiracy smasher! said...

renault crash test vs. 9/11 planes

7:10 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Do you even know what transonic means?

I didn't think so.

10:33 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

transonic? that's probably a pokemon or something.

11:15 PM  
Anonymous pinch said...


Do you take *everything* that *anyone* says literally? Do you assume that *everyone* is an expert at what they comment on?

Sure appears that way. Which is why, I'm sure, you'll comment in support of the blog page that talks about how it was REALLY a railroad train that hit the towers because since SOME people said "It sounded like a train!", it MUST have been a train!

Knock yourself out, buddy.

6:57 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The perps have already lost the hearts and minds of the American people, and their action has been a failure around the world as well. The shills are going to be left twisting in the wind as the Administration implodes.

8:37 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

the speed of sound - trans-sonic means across the speed of sound; or faster than the speed of sound.
certainly a 767 can not go that fast and a wtc's penetration by a REAL 767 is not dependant on the speed of the alleged 767 - unless the 767 were going nearly 4000mph not even one inch of it could not possibly penetrate a wtc because it is nothing more than a flying beercan - even at that speed the front portion would squash like a beercan.

"the building moved so far before whipping back"

did it? why don't we see that in any videos of the south tower hit?
again why did the images of an aluminum/plastic 767 pass thru the side of the tower like a casper the ghost without SPLAT! against the side of the massive steel/concrete wtc which did not sway at all much less "whip back" into place?

another pretend eyewitness who's declaration doesn't stand up under scrutiny.

hiding the truth or even going so far as to try and change the truth is pointless - truth will always out, even if it takes an entire generation.

9:45 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You wouldn't recognise the "truth" if it walked up to you and kicked you in your pointed head.

10:26 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

oh 10:26 please enlighten me then! prove me wrong and i would admit that i were wrong.
until then you have in actuality said nothing at all...

11:19 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

anon@8:37...the best part about it all, is this: THEY think they're going to get away with everything they've done...and will probably succeed in covering-up everything (and intimidating the media, congress, etc) until they're out of office...THEN the shit will really hit the fan, in 2009-2010...those will be the years that the whole administration gets exposed for their actions, and i see the perps being totally revealed by 2012-2015, sounds like a long time but it's not...

12:49 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Powered by Blogger