Censorship in NY Times Blog Piece on Rosie O'Donnell and 9/11
Comments are still being put up, but it's been 9 hours since I submitted a comment referring to nuclear demolition of the WTC --and there's still no sign of my comment on the site.
Interesting, in light of the fact that many comments referring to the WTC being blown by demolition have been posted. So they are not afraid of the topic of the demolition of the WTC in general.
The ugly nuclear truth must be too much for them.
Interesting, in light of the fact that many comments referring to the WTC being blown by demolition have been posted. So they are not afraid of the topic of the demolition of the WTC in general.
The ugly nuclear truth must be too much for them.
posted by spooked at 8:45 PM
8 Comments:
there are levels upon levels of so-called 9/11 truth - even in the deepest of truth actions where it would appear (at first glance anyway) that everthing is considered, the nuclear demo evidence seems to be shunted aside in favor of something else - something that in reality remains unexplained to this day.
truly it is difficult to disregard the evidence for nuke demolition:
wtc nuclear demolition 1
wtc nuclear demolition 2
I swear, every time I read this putrid pile of mental diarrhea you call a blog, you just get dumber and dumber.
The detonation of even the smallest nuclear weapon would have killed everyone within a mile of the WTC, you inbred mental midget.
I can just see poor spooked; refreshing the NYT blog over an over hoping to see his "comments" appear. At the other end of course some poor soul is laughing to herself/himslef about the kook and the mini-nuke story...
The limited hangout is "controlled demolition" of the WTC buildings, but
that doesn't include "the ugly nuclear truth" (don't want to raise the spector of the U.S. Gov't dropping the Big one on U.S. territory). Wouldn't be prudent.
ah, good old swort_of_truth_fairy is still alive and kicking!
he still pretends to know next to nothing about 9/11 in general and even less than nothing about the technology of nuclear bombs which most certainly have advanced a very long way since the 1st atomic bomb over 60 years ago.
pretense does become you swort_!
do you and your little buddy @ 9:07 profess to be able to account for the evidence of such that we can see in the 2 short documentaries included in comment #1?
www.nucleardemolition.com
nukes, yes, but perhaps they weren't *bombs*, perhaps they were *reactors*...
"The explosions were produced by a clandestine Nuclear Reactor under each tower undergoing a "power excursion" and then a core meltdown."
from www.nucleardemolition.com
www.nucleardemolition.com
seems fairly obvious doesn't it!
""wtc7 was an inside donut...wait, inside job!..right, 9/11 was an inside job!""
~rosie o'donnell
Post a Comment
<< Home