Were Planes Shot Down on 9/11?

The "anonymous physicist" wonders if Tenet was referring to planes flying into Air Force interception:

Ondrovic said, "I saw something in the sky, it was a plane, but it was way out. It looked like it was over Jersey or something, then it wasn't there anymore. I saw a small fireball, and it was gone. I saw two other planes. One came in one way, and the other came in the other way, and there was a plane in the middle that was way far off in the distance. Then the plane in the middle just disappeared into a little fire ball. It looked like the size of a golf ball from where I could see it. And the other two planes veered off into opposite directions."

This statement, or part of it, has been claimed as evidence of directed energy weapon (DEW) use. Maybe so. But I propose that the following conventional explanation is more plausible, and should be investigated. It appears that Ondrovic (in the midst of the chaos on the ground near her) is reporting two separate planes and two fireballs. Admittedly she notes that the first fireball "was way out." She offers more detail about the second fireball. Can not the second incident (and possibly the first too) be explained by my hypothesized scenario, as follows. A jet (or several) has been sent by a local commander in violation of the regime's supposed, stand down order, or NORAD "collapse." But the Air Forces did have jets flying--in fact, to make sure that nothing interfered with their nefarious plans that day. It appears that two jets from opposite sides went to intercept a third ("unauthorized") jet, and then shot it down with cannon fire or missiles. Then the two jets "veered off"--as Ondrovic notes--when their job was completed. Perhaps even this is what Tenet refers to, in his slip-up on the recent 60 minutes interview. He said "planes flying into air for[ce].airports." Now there is nothing anomalous about planes flying into "airports." But planes flying into the air FORce on 9/11 is quite striking. Note that my scenario also jives with what some witnesses claim was a shoot-down of Flight 93-by other jet(s)-- in the Shanksville, PA vicinity. I propose that instead of a stand-down, or NORAD collapse, the regime had numerous flights in the air to prevent local commanders from interfering with the 9/11 plans of the government. Flight 93 was likely shot down, and Ondrovic may have witnessed a double shoot down by conventional, but still murderous, means. I propose that the government was in fact "Flying and Lying," and shooting down those true patriots who tried to stop 9/11.

I would add that there probably was no stand-down on 9/11, as there were no real hijacked planes to shoot down, and that the apparent shoot-downs were the normal actions of the Air Force trying to stop new attacks and enforce the "grounding" orders that were issued that morning.

If planes WERE shot down that morning, the big question of course is WHAT was shot down? Passenger jets? Planes with 9/11 hoax participants? If Ondrovic DIDN'T see planes being shot down, what did she see????

I tend not to think UA93 was shot down-- I think the debris trail was planted-- but I don't rule it out either. And of course I really don't think any plane crashed in that hole in Shanksville.