Humint Events Online: WTC Window Washers and Plane-Shaped Holes

Tuesday, May 08, 2007

WTC Window Washers and Plane-Shaped Holes

It seems WTC window washers, who had special mechanical rigs based on the roof to allow them to go up and down the sides of the towers cleaning, would have had the perfect opportunity to plant shaped explosives on the outside of the towers that would blow up and make the "plane-shaped holes" in the side of the towers.

This idea is actually preferable, I think, to the idea that Directed Energy Weapons made the holes.

Note here:

and here:


The major sections of columns in the center holes merely seem to have broken off at the top and fallen inward, and the columns certainly don't look like they have been rammed inward by a huge plane that doesn't even slow as it cuts into the tower.

26 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

AHHHHH......so we are moving away from the Laser-Beam Destructo Jewish Death Ray and to the "Jewish Window Washers Planted the Bombs story!

This is beautifullll....yet ANOTHER conspiracy to add to the list!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! The Window Washers did it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Can't wait for the next one, Spooky! Can you hurry up some??? huh? huh? huhuhuh??

Come on, Toe Suckers!!!! Jump in here and support your Fearless leader!!!!!

1:02 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

window washers! that's a thought.
i like how sections of the perimeter columns are right there in the opening yet there is not one single piece of aluminum plane anywhere - did the planes kick those heavy steels back into place after entering the tower and before disappearing entirely?
or were we all fooled by easily produced video fakery of a plane?

1:13 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Who is more rational? "Spooked" or "anonymous at 1:02 PM"?

1:47 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"Who is more rational? "Spooked" or "anonymous (sic) at 1:02 PM"?"

Why SPOOKY, of course! In a world where rationality (and sanity, by extension) is measured by how many conspiracy theories one has, he is light years ahead!

Let's see....we're FINALLY up to Window Washers....after laser-beam destructor rays, nukes, truck bombs, invisible aircraft, hologram aircraft, no aircraft, pod aircraft, small aircraft (yawn...), military aircraft, forward-fuel-spraying aircraft, bombs on aircraft, thousands upon thousands of faked photographs and videos, (feel free to stop me anytime), thermite, super thermite, super-DUPER thermite, ultra-extree super duper thermite, cutting charges, squibs...thats enough for now.

So yeah, Spooky is much more rational.

3:25 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

* GOVERNMENT SAYS "GRAVITY DID IT"
* PBS NOVA SAYS "GRAVITY DID IT"
* POPULAR MECHANICS SAYS "GRAVITY DID IT"
* SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN SAYS "GRAVITY DID IT"
* PHYSICS SAYS "GRAVITY'S NOT THAT STRONG"
BESIDES, WHAT MADE THE ROOFS DISAPPEAR?

3:39 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

""columns certainly don't look like they have been rammed inward by a huge plane that doesn't even slow as it cuts into the tower.""

so the lightweight aluminum fuselage with a smooth rounded lightweight plastic nosecone CUT into the tower...like a knife?

3:48 PM  
Blogger Spooked said...

""columns certainly don't look like they have been rammed inward by a huge plane that doesn't even slow as it cuts into the tower.""

so the lightweight aluminum fuselage with a smooth rounded lightweight plastic nosecone CUT into the tower...like a knife?


Well, describing "reality" gets tricky here, doesn't it?

According to the official VIDEOS, the plane doesn't slow as it "cuts" into the towers, and officially it was a huge plane. But "reality" is different, as a real plane would have either crumpled against those columns (which doesn't happen in the videos) or a real plane would have knocked those columns completely into the building as it rammed into the tower (which didn't happen according to these photos).

4:18 PM  
Blogger Conspiracy Smasher said...

Spooked...you and your handful of friends are the KINGS OF THE FUCKTARDS! The window-washer story seals your name in infamy....

4:25 PM  
Blogger Spooked said...

Let's see....we're FINALLY up to Window Washers....after laser-beam destructor rays, nukes, truck bombs, invisible aircraft, hologram aircraft, no aircraft, pod aircraft, small aircraft (yawn...), military aircraft, forward-fuel-spraying aircraft, bombs on aircraft, thousands upon thousands of faked photographs and videos, (feel free to stop me anytime), thermite, super thermite, super-DUPER thermite, ultra-extree super duper thermite, cutting charges, squibs...thats enough for now. Well, a rational person using the scientific method would sort through ALL possibilities. That's what I have been doing here. And I have discounted most of those serious possibilities you have mentioned-- though I never have mentioned "super-DUPER thermite, ultra-extree super duper thermite" or " laser-beam destructor rays" or "forward-fuel-spraying aircraft" (whatever that is). Also, I never said there were thousands of fake video and photos. There are a few fake photos of the second plane, NO DOUBT. I think the 35 or so 2nd hit videos were altered in some way as well.

In any case, it sure would be nice if at some point you could stop making a fool of yourself by trying to make fun of me, and seriously discuss the evidence. Like how is it that a plane at 500+ mph can slice into and disappear in a tower, not slow and also not knock huge sections of columns further inward?

4:28 PM  
Blogger Spooked said...

KINGS OF THE FUCKTARDS!

LOVE IT!!!!!!!!!!!!

LOL!!!!!!

4:29 PM  
Anonymous !conspiracy smasher! said...

another irrelevent comment from the phony conspiracy smasher @4:25 -
excellent job there phony!

4:57 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"In any case, it sure would be nice if at some point you could stop making a fool of yourself by trying to make fun of me"

ME making a fool of myself? Chortle/chuckle/snort.

Really, Spooky. You need to get at least a tenuous grasp on reality. You are the one being made a fool of, exclusively by your own crazy postings.

If you really, honestly think what you are saying is true, post your real name here. Put some backbone behind these idiotic mental meanderings and take some pride in your bullshit. Staying anonymous just adds to the belief that 1) you are scared to put your real name to this crap and 2) you really are a disinfo agent, because *nobody* could come up with this crap and expect their particular shit stain on the fabric of life would go without being derided by any and all sane people.

So....who are you?

10:29 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

speculation is not disinfo.
the disinfo is the NIST report, the 911 commission report and the media presentations of the entire 9/11 affair.

using the window washer machines to place explosives that blast plane-shaped holes on the face of each tower makes perfect sense in light of the fact that no aluminum plane in existence could have penetrated either wtc and the vids of the second hit are obvious phonies.

12:44 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Give me a freaking break, asshole. Speculation is *not* disinfo when that speculation is so fucked up and so far out of the realm of possibility or rational thought that all it does is make your "cause" look absolutely and incredibly idiotic.

That is what you are doing. A giant invisible pig sat on the towers and then farted, which brought down WTC 7. Prove me wrong! THAT makes as much sense as what you are *speculating*.

6:38 AM  
Blogger Spooked said...

Let's see here.

Some facts--
1) the plane-shaped holes defy physics
2) videos of the plane entering said hole defy physics
3) columns knocked out of hole look only weakly blown inwards
4) window washer machines exist and give access to the outside of the towers
5) explosives exist

Reasonable theory-- the plane-shaped holes were made by explosives planted by people on window washer machines

So what does "anonymous" at 6:38 AM counter with?

A giant farting invisible pig.

Well done, Mr. Sane and Rational!!!

7:59 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

You have a weird idea of what physics does.

What is your job again, btw?

Prove what you claim. By proof I mean not bullshit rabbit wire and kerosene playtoys. Prove to me and the world that *your* physics is correct and a plane would not/could not have made those holes.

Not your idea of what happened or should have happened. Not what you think should have happened or what you think it should have looked like. Not what your perfectly engineered and aeronautically-trained brain thinks things should be like. Not what that pile of shit sitting on your shoulders thinks should have happened because you hate George Bush so damn much you'll come up with the most incredible fucking out-of-this world bullshit to make fit what you want to have happened.

8:47 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Anonymous @8:47 said...

""You have a weird idea of what physics does.""

no fool, you are the one with a tenuous grasp on the physics of an aluminum/plastic real plane penetrating a massive steel/concrete wtc.
it could not happen and not one alleged "smart guy" on the entire planet has yet deigned to explain exactly in what manner it could. i'm not holding my breath waiting for your science teacher's explanation either.

and the NIST/911 commission's pretense at an explanation for the demise of both towers holds no more water than your invisible giant farting pig theory does.

10:47 AM  
Blogger Spooked said...

As I have explained here ad nauseum, the plane-shaped holes defy physics because an object, such as a predominantly aluminum plane, cannot make a cut-out shape of itself during a collision with a strong heavy object such as a steel and concrete tower -- but then get completely destroyed by the same type of material it initially cut through: steel columns, steel spandrel plates, steel trusses and concrete floors.

Basically, the official story is saying that a plane can act indestructible as it slides in the tower, yet the plane then turns into a fragile structure after it penetrates.

This does not even take into account the barely pushed in outer steel columns, and the ghostly physics-defying behaviour shown by the plane in the videos.

Anyway, I say, it is not up to me to "prove" this-- I say it is up to the supporters of the official story to prove their version of events-- which they simply have not done. All they can say is that everything happened the way it happened-- and then make fun of anyone who says otherwise. At least I tried to do some tests. I never claimed my tests proved anything significant, but at least I TRIED to test the official story-- something more than any of you has ever done.

11:24 AM  
Blogger Total said...

maybe the "window washers" put (aerosolized super-nano-)thermite (analogs) there?

Look into the Swedish "art students" as well.. just as likely perps as the window washers perhaps...

12:16 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

the official govt/media 9/11 fairytale is proven to be a farce from beginning to end and is the true disinfo. this fairytale was the enablement for the destruction of iraq and countless middle eastern lives continue to be ruined to this day as a result.
one can either denounce this fairytale for the disinfo that it is or one can rest comfortably in one's willful ignorance knowing that "it doesn't affect me and besides, American Idle is on right now!"
if there are history books in the future they will certainly not paint the america of today in a good light.
but that's ok! because right now we have an oilman prez with his oilman cabinet limiting the flow of oil from iraq and the price of oil continues to climb.
go team!
BUSHCO '08!

fuck off! @8:47am

12:38 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Where do you work, Spook?

1:19 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"an object...cannot make a cut-out shape of itself during a collision with a strong heavy object such as a steel and concrete tower -- but then get completely destroyed by the same type of material it initially cut through: steel columns, steel spandrel plates, steel trusses and concrete floors."

You still ignore the Space Shuttle Columbia and the styrofoam insulation that created a shaped-hole of itself (based on ground-based experiments - that did not, by the way, include rabbit wire and kerosene of tennis shoes) and destroyed the material it impacted, not to mention caused a multi-billion dollar machine to cease working..

In any event you are full of shit. Your description above of what teh plane impacted doesn't even mention glass, so your thesis is already flawed by intentional omissions of important materials that do not lend credence to your theory.

1:47 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

""description above of what teh plane impacted doesn't even mention glass""
~@1:47pm

glass! wow you're right; the lightweight smooth rounded plastic nosecone of a lightweight aluminum beercan-like fuselage of a REAL 767 CAN penetrate glass!
however, the massive hardened steel box columns built with 3" thick steel plate @ the floors where the "767" was "filmed" penetrating the wtc were placed such that there was only 3' space between them for any glass windows.
a 767 cannot penetrate a wtc...especially entirely without leaving any trace whatsoever of it's having been there at all.

2:36 PM  
Blogger Spooked said...

You still ignore the Space Shuttle Columbia and the styrofoam insulation that created a shaped-hole of itself (based on ground-based experiments - that did not, by the way, include rabbit wire and kerosene of tennis shoes) and destroyed the material it impacted, not to mention caused a multi-billion dollar machine to cease working..

You're simply wrong about the foam test.

The foam merely scratched the surface of the wing and cracked the material inside. This damage was not even a problem until re-entry anyway. It's not that the foam directly caused the space shuttle fall apart.

Not that the foam test is a great analogy for a 767 wing being impacted by a series of large steel columns, anyway.

I actually did link to the NASA foam test some time back here, for the reason that a fairly fragile object (the foam) was accelerated very fast (530 mph) and then collided with a hard heavy object.
The foam here is more analogous to the plane and the wing to the WTC. In any case, the foam DID NOT penetrate the wing-- it bounced off! Moreover, the foam clearly distorted as it impacted, much in the way I would expect a plane to distort as it hits a large heavy object.

I don't know what "kerosene of tennis shoes" is supposed to mean, though it sounds kind of cool.

In any event you are full of shit. Your description above of what teh [sic] plane impacted doesn't even mention glass, so your thesis is already flawed by intentional omissions of important materials that do not lend credence to your theory.

I can only assume you are joking, right?

4:10 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

since their own lack of relevent words pertaining to 9/11 reveal that they do not believe the official govt/media 9/11 fairytale any more than the rest of us do what they DO say should indeed be considered to be nothing more than a joke.

4:37 PM  
Anonymous www.avila-3d.com said...

The guy is definitely right, and there's no question.

11:57 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Powered by Blogger