September Clues Part 2-- Comments and Critiques
This Video.
1) the initial plane path discrepency looks fairly convincing-- I have used that first clip in the past to show a conflict with another video
2) the plane color argument DOESN'T hold water for two reasons-- a) officially the plane was flying in the shadow of the WTC smoke trail, which is why it could be dark and not shiny, b) objects reflect light differently from different angles, so saying wings are dark from one angle and light from another doesn't mean much
3) the analysis of the home video is good, suggesting crude editing removing the plane
4) I'm not sure the "pixel bleed" phenomenon at 2:45 remaining isn't some compression artifact from low-resolution digitized videos, so this bit isn't convincing for me
5) the sound analysis is interesting though not necessarily convincing
6) the very last segment showing the helicopter coming by the south tower in one video and not the network "live" video is very oimportant-- and this is something I have been meaning to analyze. Several second hit videos show this helicopter but others DON'T. Apart from the obvious answer of video fakery, WHY has the helicopter been cut out of many videos?
TO SUMMARIZE: This part 2 "September Clues" video, along with part 1, has very key convincing evidence of video fakery. But part 2 has a few segments that are not accurate or convincing-- unlike part 1, which was almost flawless.
1) the initial plane path discrepency looks fairly convincing-- I have used that first clip in the past to show a conflict with another video
2) the plane color argument DOESN'T hold water for two reasons-- a) officially the plane was flying in the shadow of the WTC smoke trail, which is why it could be dark and not shiny, b) objects reflect light differently from different angles, so saying wings are dark from one angle and light from another doesn't mean much
3) the analysis of the home video is good, suggesting crude editing removing the plane
4) I'm not sure the "pixel bleed" phenomenon at 2:45 remaining isn't some compression artifact from low-resolution digitized videos, so this bit isn't convincing for me
5) the sound analysis is interesting though not necessarily convincing
6) the very last segment showing the helicopter coming by the south tower in one video and not the network "live" video is very oimportant-- and this is something I have been meaning to analyze. Several second hit videos show this helicopter but others DON'T. Apart from the obvious answer of video fakery, WHY has the helicopter been cut out of many videos?
TO SUMMARIZE: This part 2 "September Clues" video, along with part 1, has very key convincing evidence of video fakery. But part 2 has a few segments that are not accurate or convincing-- unlike part 1, which was almost flawless.
posted by spooked at 8:33 AM
3 Comments:
Speaking of airbrushing scene of crime evidence, this 'parkforeman' clip has the passing 'white elephant' usually on the right of the screen, taken out.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h0SULNFX0-Y
When it first came out, Park Foreman wasn't even a real video. They introduced the "plane crash" gradually on 9/11, probably to make sure everyone was buying the story.
Anonymous Photo becomes Park Foreman Video
Also, CNN or their masters airbrushed out all sorts of things, in addition to running fake audio tracks over the videos.
Check out The Deleted Missile on CNN
i think there also may have been a "black elephant" plane because i know someone who lived in NYC at the time, and SWEARS they saw a black or dark-blue jetliner in the WTC area around the time of the second "impact"...
Post a Comment
<< Home