The Blocked Hole
I simply can't see how the outer columns and floor knocked asunder as shown in this picture are consistent with a 767 bashing through here and disappearing further in:
The major problem is the collapsed floor, which is clearly blocking the path of the port wing. And given the position of the floor, it is extremely difficult to see how this could have happened after a plane went in.
I suppose the oddest part is the complete absence of any apparent plane debris.
I don't know what is weirder, that the perps created a hole that matches the outline of a 767 so well-- or that the hole makes no sense for a plane crash.
The major problem is the collapsed floor, which is clearly blocking the path of the port wing. And given the position of the floor, it is extremely difficult to see how this could have happened after a plane went in.
I suppose the oddest part is the complete absence of any apparent plane debris.
I don't know what is weirder, that the perps created a hole that matches the outline of a 767 so well-- or that the hole makes no sense for a plane crash.
posted by spooked at 2:43 PM
18 Comments:
And if we have a COLLAPSED FLOOR--why didn't the Pristine Pancakes, and total "collapse" begin then?
Anonymous Physicist
and why were those columns forced outwards?
only an explosion from within could cause that damage.
Perdue University released a computer simulation several months agao showing how it happened.
Get with the times, bro.
"Perdue University"? Is that where they educate chickens?
Perhaps you mean PURDUE university.
But if you do mean PURDUE university, they did nothing like what you claim.
I challenge you to show me where ANYONE explains this particular blockage in the hole in favor of the official story. Specifically where they explain this floor that is blocking the penetration of the port wing root into the tower.
sword_of_a fool makes an appearance!
did you not claim to be the "sword of physics"?
if so then here is an easy one for you:
https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8009371&postID=6714399900538275291&isPopup=true
Baby Low Yeild (swart, with his own spelling),
still can't spell or think beyond the first grade level... so sad.
But there is an "explanation":
Purdue U. (forever more P.U., as in stench) predictably created a magical, PRISTINE PLANE that would cause PRISTINE PANCAKES, by first going through matter without any deformation or destruction of itself, like its monstrous forerunner--the Pristine Bullet.
Same regime, same ludicrous lies for the masses, until they wake up and get rid of it.
Anonymous Physicist
It was the fire, the FIRE!
Poor sobs.
""Perdue University"? Is that where they educate chickens?"
I thought it was where they made "chicken wire" You know, the kind you made your "model" with...lol...
the hole is indeed blocked as is patently obvious simply by observing the photos.
since by simply observing the media videos of alleged ua175 entering the tower entirely without a single piece of it falling to the street outside of the tower, we can assume only 2 different scenarios (as pertaining to the hole):
1) the alleged ua175, after totally entering the tower, decided to kick those perimeter columns behind itself back into the holes' opening.
2) the alleged ua175 that allegedly made this hole was merely a phony video image of a ua175 entering the tower and was not really there to begin with.
if anyone has a different scenario in mind then by all means, bust it out!
truly this is becoming tedious - does sword of conspiracy smasher have anything of import to say about this or should we write him (and his wife's bukkake hobby) off entirely?
And given the position of the floor, it is extremely difficult to see how this could have happened after a plane went in.
Could you explain this statement further please? Maybe draw a diagram of how the floors SHOULD'VE fallen?
There are plenty of instances of planes crashing into skyscrapers you should be able to reference, so it shouldn't be too hard. Obviously you've gained your expertise by researching them. I'm just looking for some more information on why you feel it's "extremely difficult".
"Knocked asunder"?
Don't taze me, bro!!!!!
Don't hold your breath waiting for an explanation from the no-plane conspiracy clowns Chad....
10:38 PM-- actually this was the hole in the north tower from "AA11"
"And given the position of the floor, it is extremely difficult to see how this could have happened after a plane went in."
Could you explain this statement further please? Maybe draw a diagram of how the floors SHOULD'VE fallen?
There are plenty of instances of planes crashing into skyscrapers you should be able to reference, so it shouldn't be too hard. Obviously you've gained your expertise by researching them. I'm just looking for some more information on why you feel it's "extremely difficult".
As to the diagram, it should be obvious from the pictures in the post that the floor in question blocks the port wing. Further, after the incident, this floor has been knocked down, but it is still in a position to block the wing's progress into the bldg. The problem is that there is no sign of this wing or the plane in front of the floor. This is what is called a conundrum. How can the wing (we're talking about the thick wing root section) go around a floor in it's path?
As far as other planes hitting skyscrapers, the only incidents I know are ones where the plane didn't penetrate significantly, eg the B25 into the Empire State Building, and did minimal; damage to the building.
"there is no sign of this wing or the plane in front of the floor."
What do you thing a wing SHOULD look like after hitting a steel and concrete wall at 500 knots?
Tell us, oh great Aeronautical Engineer aka Dumb Shit?
What do you thing a wing SHOULD look like after hitting a steel and concrete wall at 500 knots?
Well this is a good point, which raises another conundrum. How does a wing totally bash in a huge section of steel columns and also knock loose several concrete floors-- but then completely disappear?
If you're saying the wing and fuselage did all this damage, then we should see significant pieces of the plane remaining.
If the plane was torn to shreds on impact, then there shouldn't be this giant hole in the wall.
My argument is there is no way could a wing create this damage in the first place!
Capice?
Now, are you trying to argue that all the plane debris is in FRONT of the fallen floor?
Shouldn't we see SOME debris there?
of course they capice!
that is why they never actually address the issue of an aluminum wing vs massive steel/concrete wtc, but instead try to distract and/or change the subject.
perhaps they need to bring in a sharper sword.
My argument is there is no way could a wing create this damage in the first place!
I'm certain that your computer simulations will show this.
I eagerly await seeing your results.
Post a Comment
<< Home