Trick o' the Tail
The columns where the vertical stabilizer (tail) section (a 25 foot tall structure on a Boeing 767) disappeared into are essentially intact except for some indentations on the surface cladding:
The tail clearly didn't break off, nor did it apparently go into the building.
Where did it go????
Did it disappear into dust?
Or did it turn into gray WTC pixels?
The tail clearly didn't break off, nor did it apparently go into the building.
Where did it go????
Did it disappear into dust?
Or did it turn into gray WTC pixels?
posted by spooked at 10:17 AM
13 Comments:
i wonder how they made those indentations on the cladding.
explaining this is a job for sword_of_physics - you are the smart guy, right sword?
whats up with that, sword_of_physics?
did you not claim to be the smart guy? are you not representative of JREF's "finest"?
you want to be the smart guy, this is your chance.
What is the tail made of? How much did it weigh? With that info you can calculate mass, and that will give you a better answer regarding what was it capable of doing rather than speculating what it "should" have done.
don't try to sidetrack, that tactic doesn't work over here.
if you are indeed the smart guy then you should be able to figure this out.
if you actually care about uncovering the truth of the events of 9/11 then you should WANT to figure this out.
anything less than that shows your true intention.
it is as simple as that.
why do the official video representations show the tail gliding effortlessly and ENTIRELY into the tower, while the official photos of the hole, where the tail supposedly disappeared ENTIRELY, reveal that it did not even make a hole?
there is only one possible answer to this, IN MY OPINION:
the tail that we were shown in the official videos is not a real tail but merely a false image of a tail that wasn't really there at all.
hence, 9/11 video fakery.
do you have a different explanation for why what we were officially presented with does not jibe with the results of such that we were also officially presented with?
truly i would be more than happy to embrace the official govt/media version of 9/11 events, because then i could rest easier knowing that our govt/media are indeed the good guys rather than the evil manipulative criminals that they appear to be, but so far not even one single aspect of their version of 9/11 events has held up to scrutiny.
so. you are either one who seriously tries to figure it all out or you are one who is actively trying to perpetuate the cover-up.
it is as simple as that.
I don't think "mass' had much to do with what is seen. The composition of a Boeing tail is a more relevant question. They used to be aluminum and fiberglass, and this one probably was too. But now they are making the tails out of some sort of carbon composite material.
But really, the first things to figure out are:
1) was there a real 25 foot tall tail there?
2) if so, what happened to it?
Anon@1:29 makes a good point, calculate the mass, etc...
why don't you instead calculate the mass of the tower...that is where the supposedly real tail disappeared entirely without leaving a hole.
right then. the only explanation for this phenomena to date is video fakery.
What the fuck does the mass have to do with it? There's no hole for the huge tail to go into and it didn't fucking break off!
Where did it go???
it (tail fin) didn't go anywhere because it wasn't really there in the first place.
i still wonder; what made the indentations/scratches on the aluminum cladding?
anon @ 10:13-- yes, those are my thoughts too.
Possibly the simplest explanation is that the photos were tampered with to show a "tail mark". There aren't very many photos of the south tower hole, only a couple show a "tail mark" and none of them are very high resolution.
Though another explanation is whoever devised the explosives to produce the hole, put a tiny amount where the tail was supposed to be.
Thanks so much for the article, pretty useful data.
Post a Comment
<< Home