Tuesday, October 30, 2007
Previous Posts
- Cheney and Addington: War-Criminals
- GODDAMN the Warmongerers and Their Media Lackeys
- Nuke Proliferation
- Bach's Brandenburg Concerto #3 in G
- A Lot of Missing Core Columns
- Collapse, My Ass
- Erased from the Collective Memory
- Proof of High Heat at Ground Zero, Six Weeks After...
- David H. Brooks: Scumbucket
- Select a Candidate 2008
Recommended Reading
- The "Ultimate List" of Improbabilities and Coincidences Around 9/11
- Manifesto for All Present and Future Military Personnel
- The Nine Circles of Conspiracy
- Ultimate Truths (Deep Conspiracy)
- Nuclear Demolition of the WTC
- China Syndrome at the WTC
- Dead 9/11 Whistleblowers
- Bogus Official 9/11 Science
- Anonymous Physicist's book site
- 120 Reasons for the No-Plane Theory
- People Who Should Have Seen UA175 Hit the South Tower But Didn't
- 9/11: All Roads Lead to MIHOP
- 9/11: Possible Versus Impossible
- Ghost Gun UA175
- Morgan Reynolds, We Have Holes
- Hunt the Boeing, Shanksville Edition
- Hunt the Boeing, WTC2 Edition
- The No Planes Evidence Kit
- Why Don't More Engineers Question the WTC Collapses?
- Evidence of advanced fusion devices at the WTC
- The Problem with the 9/11 "Truth" Movement
- Brainwashed, In Deep Denial, A Government Shill, Or Some Combination of the Three
- 9/11 Conspiracy.tv
- 9/11 Conspiracy.tv blog
- International Center for 9/11 Studies - NIST Cumulus Video Database
- 9/11 "U"
- Killtown's Overview Site
- Killtown's 9/11 Smoking Guns
- Killtown's 2nd Hit Video Compilation
- Killtown's NIST figure gallery
- Morgan Reynolds
- The 9/11 Airplane Video Composites
- Ace Baker
- Killtown's Blog
- Genghis' 911 Taboo
- Ningen's Blog
- 9/11 Truthlings Watch
- Judy Wood's 9/11 site (focuses on WTC demolition)
- 9/11 Logic
Interesting and/or Useful 9/11 Sites
Archives
- August 2004
- September 2004
- October 2004
- November 2004
- December 2004
- January 2005
- February 2005
- March 2005
- April 2005
- May 2005
- June 2005
- July 2005
- August 2005
- September 2005
- October 2005
- November 2005
- December 2005
- January 2006
- February 2006
- March 2006
- April 2006
- May 2006
- June 2006
- July 2006
- August 2006
- September 2006
- October 2006
- November 2006
- December 2006
- January 2007
- February 2007
- March 2007
- April 2007
- May 2007
- June 2007
- July 2007
- August 2007
- September 2007
- October 2007
- November 2007
- December 2007
- January 2008
- February 2008
- March 2008
- April 2008
- May 2008
- June 2008
- July 2008
- August 2008
- September 2008
- October 2008
- November 2008
- December 2008
- January 2009
- February 2009
- March 2009
- April 2009
- May 2009
- June 2009
- July 2009
- August 2009
- September 2009
- October 2009
- November 2009
- December 2009
- January 2010
- February 2010
- March 2010
- April 2010
- May 2010
- June 2010
- July 2010
- August 2010
- September 2010
- October 2010
- November 2010
- December 2010
- January 2011
- February 2011
- March 2011
- April 2011
- May 2011
- June 2011
- July 2011
- August 2011
- September 2011
- October 2011
- November 2011
- December 2011
- January 2012
- February 2012
- March 2012
- April 2012
- May 2012
- June 2012
- July 2012
- August 2012
- September 2012
- October 2012
- November 2012
- December 2012
- January 2013
- February 2013
- March 2013
- April 2013
- May 2013
- June 2013
- July 2013
- August 2013
- September 2013
- October 2013
- November 2013
- December 2013
- January 2014
- February 2014
- March 2014
- April 2014
- May 2014
- June 2014
- July 2014
- August 2014
- September 2014
- October 2014
- November 2014
- December 2014
- January 2015
- February 2015
- March 2015
- April 2015
- May 2015
- June 2015
- July 2015
- August 2015
- September 2015
- October 2015
- November 2015
- December 2015
- January 2016
- February 2016
- March 2016
- April 2016
- May 2016
- June 2016
- July 2016
- August 2016
- September 2016
- October 2016
- November 2016
- December 2016
- January 2017
- February 2017
- March 2017
- April 2017
- May 2017
- June 2017
- July 2017
- August 2017
- September 2017
- October 2017
- November 2017
- December 2017
- January 2018
- February 2018
- March 2018
- April 2018
- May 2018
- June 2018
- July 2018
- August 2018
- September 2018
- October 2018
- November 2018
- December 2018
- January 2019
- February 2019
- March 2019
- April 2019
- May 2019
- June 2019
- July 2019
- August 2019
- September 2019
- October 2019
- November 2019
- December 2019
- January 2020
- February 2020
- March 2020
- April 2020
- May 2020
- June 2020
- July 2020
- August 2020
- September 2020
- October 2020
- November 2020
- December 2020
- January 2021
- February 2021
- March 2021
- April 2021
- May 2021
- June 2021
- July 2021
- August 2021
- September 2021
- October 2021
- November 2021
- December 2021
- January 2022
- February 2022
- March 2022
- April 2022
- May 2022
- June 2022
- July 2022
- August 2022
- September 2022
- October 2022
- November 2022
- December 2022
- January 2023
- February 2023
- March 2023
- April 2023
- May 2023
- June 2023
- July 2023
- August 2023
- September 2023
- October 2023
- November 2023
- January 2024
- February 2024
- March 2024
- April 2024
- May 2024
- June 2024
- July 2024
- August 2024
- September 2024
- October 2024
- January 2100
My Other Blogs
- WTC Demolition
- WTC China Syndrome
- 33 Watch
- Al-CIA-duh
- Ghost Plane
- Flight 93 Hoax
- Pentagon Hit
- The AIG Scam
- THE WORST PRESIDENT EVER!!!!
- Bush Administration War Criminals
- Fake Opposition Democrats
Some of My Findings Regarding the Attack on the WTC South Tower
- Summary of Evidence for No Plane at the South Tower
- Clearest Evidence of Conflicting Plane Paths in Two Different 2nd Hit Videos
- Freak Plane
- The Curious Plane in the "Live" Video
- Too Small of a Plane in Both "Live" 2nd Hit Videos
- Mutant Tail Section on UA175
- Evidence of 2nd Hit Video Fakery
- Proof that the engine part at Church and Murray Street is not from UA175, a Boeing 767
- 9/11 Blimp
- 9/11 Blogger
- 9/11 Closeup (Gerard Holmgren)
- 9/11 Complicity
- Conspicuous Plot
- Conspiracy Smasher!!!
- 9/11 Cover-Up
- 9/11 Encyclopedia
- 9/11 Exposed
- 9/11 Foreknowledge
- 9/11 Hoax
- 9/11 Oddities
- 9/11 Overview
- 9/11 Oz (Australian)
- 9/11 Plot
- 9/11 Proof
- 9/11 Research (Jim Hoffman)
- 9/11 Resources
- 9/11 Review.org
- 9/11 Review.com
- 9/11 Stealth
- 9/11 Strike
- 9/11 "U"
- 9/11 Verses
- Complete 9/11 Timeline (Paul Thompson)
- Finnish 9/11 Site
- Finnish 9/11 Site in English
- German Engineers 9/11 site
- Hybrideb's 9/11 site
- Icelandic 9/11 site
- Jane Doe's 9/11 site
- Oil and Empire 9/11 (Mark Robinowitz)
- Portland Indy Media 9/11
- 119 Questions about 9/11
- Let's Roll 9/11
- Nerdcities 9/11
- Patriots Question 9/11
- RINF 9/11 Archive
- The Mysteries of 9/11
- Shunned
- Physics 911
- Plague Puppy's Cafe
- Plague Puppy: Alternate Site
- Question 911
- Scholars for 9/11 Truth
- Serendipity (various essays on 9/11)
- Steven Warran
- Stop the Lie 9/11
- Unanswered Questions
- Questions Questions
- The Web Fairy
- Wing TV
- 9/11 Blogger
- 9/11 Citizens' Court
- 9/11 Citizens' Watch
- 9/11 Skeptics Unite!
- 911 Truth.org
- 911 Truth LA.us
- 911 Truth LA.org
- 911 Truth Emergence
- 911 We Know
- 911 Truth Movement Musings
- 9-11 Visibility Project
- 9-11 UK
- 9/11 Family Steering Committee
- NY 9/11 Truth
- San Francisco 9/11 Truth
- Scholars for 9/11 Truth
- Community Currency 9/11
- Summer of Truth
- Proposition 911
- Reopen 911
- Deception Dollars
- Justice for 9/11
- Team 8 Plus
- Flight 93 Hoax
- WTC Demolition
- The Ultimate Hijacker Compilation
- 9/11 Photo Analysis
- Evidence of Explosives on 9/11
- Demolition, the Truth of 9/11 and the WTC
- 9/11 and the Impossible: the WTC collapse
- WTC Streaking Object, WTC7 theories
- Flight 77 FOIA site
- Flight 93 Crash.com
- Pentagon Research
- Brad's Pentagon Analysis
- 9/11 chronology (network footage)
- Buddy Buddy
- Pentagon Strike
- 911 Questions
- FKN News
- Rigorous Intuition v2.0
- Wing TV
- Xymphora
- The Bulldog Manifesto
- Center for an Informed America
- George Washington
- Centre for Research on Globalization
- Prison Planet (Alex Jones)
- Daily Two Minutes of Hate
- The Emperor's New Clothes
- Public Action (Carol Valentine)
- Propaganda Matrix
- Daniel Hopsicker
- What Really Happened
- From the Wilderness (Mike Ruppert)
- Arctic Beacon
- Cryptome
- Crimes and Corruptions of the New World Order News
- Break for News
- Tom Flocco
- Rense
- "The New Pearl Harbor, Disturbing Questions About the Bush Administration and 9/11" by David Ray Griffin
- "The 9/11 Commission Report: Omissions And Distortions" by David Ray Griffin
- 9/11 Revealed by Rowland Morgan and Ian Henshall
- "9/11 Synthetic Terror, Made in USA" by Webster G. Tarpley
- "The Terror Timeline" by Paul Thompson
- "Crossing the Rubicon" by Michael C. Ruppert
- "Welcome to Terrorland" by Daniel Hopsicker
- Pig Lipstick
- Weazl's Revenge
- Alex Constantine
- Buzzflash
- The Raw Story
- Democratic Underground
- Progressive Independent
- Think Progress
- Citizens for a Legitimate Government
- Common Dreams
- Consortium News
- Center for Cooperative Research
- Cursor
- Guerrilla News
- Online Journal
- The Memory Hole
- Information Clearing House
- Press Action
- News from Babylon
- Unknown News
- TV News Lies
- After Downing Street
- Eschaton
- Glenn Greenwald (old blog))
- Daily Kos
- Talking Points Memo
- Hullabaloo
- The Brad Blog
- Jesus' General
- The Rude Pundit
- The Poor Man
- Juan Cole (Informed Comment)
- Today in Iraq
- Antiwar.com
- Iraq Coalition Casualties
- Clusterfuck Nation
- Donkey Rising
- Salon
- Slate
- The Association for the Study of Peak Oil and Gas
- The Oil Drum
- Land of Black Gold
- Life After the Oil Crash
- Richard Heinberg
- Grist
- 9/11 was a conspiracy, as it involved several people conspiring to commit a crime. The official 9/11 narrative, as codified by the 9/11 Commission Report, is NOT proven as the most likely explanation for the events of 9/11/01. The official 9/11 story is therefore a theory. This means that the OFFICIAL 9/11 Story is really a "CONSPIRACY THEORY"!
- I have no fondness for any religion, as I think it makes people do extreme and violent things. Islamic terrorists do exist and I detest them as much as I detest the true perpetrators of 9/11. Most likely Islamic terrorists were used as patsies in 9/11, as part of a highly organized covert operation by a group affiliated with the US goverment and US military.
14 Comments:
Yeah. It is appearing on this sorry ass fucked up blog.
i do. the direction of the shadows would indicate that the sun is behind the astro-not and the lander yet we can see this side of both.
since there is no atmosphere to diffuse the sunlight on the moon, the side facing the camera, on both the *hero* and the lander should be pitch black at best - like the inside of that hole or the near side of those small rocks.
Those two white light reflections in the top right seem a bit odd, as does the lack of lead-in footprints. What else?
Funny thing about this ridiculous photo is: unless this AstroNUT made a 6 foot+ jump to arrive where he currently is (and the highest AstroNut "Lunar" jump I have seen to this date in 'Official' NASA films is a little over a foot...just like what you would accomplish in earth gravity BTW), there is no way he coul've arrived at that spot without being lifted there.
http://tinyurl.com/yw4za8
For there are simply no footprints anywhere behind him (at least none within a realistic stride/jump distance)leading to the spot he ended up...
Well I was going to say that, Rob. But thought the shills would come back and say his shadow hides some footprints (even though he should have walked from the "LM" direction).
But it is also true that the "LM" and his spacesuit should be quite dark, as noted above, by 10:00 PM (good job.).
This is also one of the very few photos of "the Moon" in an Apollo photo that doesn't have that IDENTICAL hilly background. Check out the horizon. For this one they left out the painted background that they usually put in.
A.P.
Exactly A.P.!
Notice how Pitch Black the shadow in front of him is, and at the same time how nicely illuminated (b.w.o. fill lighting) the shadow side of his body/suit is!!
Can we say "Secondary Illumination" children!? I KNEW you could! hehe
You guys have me rolling on the floor.
Do us all a favor and go read this page and get back to us.
http://www.uscoles.com/fstop.htm
Its called "f-stop"
How does f-stop settings explain the lack of footprints?
Apart from the lack of footprints and what I agree is odd lighting, that crater in the background looks quite uncrater-like to me.
f/stop?
The f/stop regulates how much light is allowed through the lens by varying the area of the hole the light comes through.
it doesn't say anything about artificially illuminating the side of an object hidden from the sun in an environment with no atmosphere.
f/this!
"... that crater in the background looks quite uncrater-like to me."
And your experience and expertise and lunar acumen on knowing what a crater would look like on the moon is......what?
You love doing that - saying what YOU think something should look like without having even the FUCKING FOGGIEST idea what it would look like in the first place. This is a classic example of someone living in a fantasy world, making shit up when they don't know what it should be in the first place, or if they don't LIKE what the reality of life gives them.
"How does f-stop settings explain the lack of footprints?"
what lack of footprints? Just because you choose not to acknowledge that footprints COULD be in the shadow or on the surface BEHIND the astronaut leading from the ridge of the crater or he might have jumped there from outside the picture frame on the left, turned around and was beginning to jump back. 1/6th gravity and all - but I forgot - gravity is in on this whole galactic conspiracy as well.
Keep those hits coming, Spookster! I love looking to see what the next ball of booger brain shit post you have up!
JREF shill/CIA/NSA agent:
Your fakery boys already demonstrated they could never jump more than a foot. We all here know why! We all know where they were. So don't dare say the Astro-not jumped anywhere.
And Spooked is quite right, we have seen enough real craters to note the "anomaly" of no perimeter ridge nor ejecta (other than a rock or 2 placed there--with a "C", shill?)
See the top pic here:
http://www.meteorcrater.com/index.php
Note the perimeter elevated ridge, not that obviously dug out crap in the laughable "Apollo photo." Spooked is certainly right.
"F/Stop", liar, can't create light when there is none.
And I love how these shills evade the issue. The makers of the film and the camera have admitted neither would have worked on the Moon. Examination of the suit and glove etc. indicate the Astro-nots would have had great difficulty in taking ANY pics, let alone any good ones.
Read "Dark Moon. Apollo and the Whistleblowers."
The fake "Apollo" program and the next one to follow--which is why agents/scum like this one try so hard [think on this people] rely on both the big lie technique and the sheeple's desperate denial mechanism not to perceive their regime for what it is--a lying, mass murdering monster...With lots of scum like this one dooming their own children just to make a buck, and get the bennies.
Anonymous Physicist
To the dickweed at 10:38am--
most moon craters have a sharp rim, for instance see here:
http://www.ghg.net/egrafton/clay1.jpg
I am pointing out a simple fact, dickweed, that this crater has a rim that looks eroded, not sharp. Please tell us what erodes a crater rim on the moon?
Now does this smooth rim prove anything? No, because crater formation can be complex and it is in the realm of possibility that this is a real crater. But I didn't claim this smooth-edged crater was proof of anything. But I found it suspicious, following the logic of probability.
So we have three strikes against this image:
1) no footprints leading to where the dude is standing -- and I find it unlikely there are footprints in the shadow because that would mean this dude was walking straight backwards with an odd wide-legged stance for no apparent reason (was this guy Larry Craig?)
2) the lighting artifacts (and what is that white thing glowing to the left of the lander?)
3) the oddly smoothed-edge crater
Given all the other anomalies of the Apollo program, I think it is reasonable to conclude that this photo was shot on earth under special lighting conditions, and that the "astronaut" was lowered onto this position using wires-- thus the lack of footprints. This would in fact explain the set of footprints clustered around where he was set down.
Now, to the dickweed at 10:38am-- I don't know why it is so amazingly shocking to you that someone would hypothesize something different from mainstream thinking on an obscure site on the internet. Not to mention that the rebuttals that dickweeds like you present to us are almost completely composed of insults and are almost completely fact-free.
I do think however, that it is kind of cute that you keep coming here over and over to defend the official story, for whatever the official story is.
If you look at it purely from the perspective of the photo, things are not clear enough to consider it real or fake.
If you look at it purely from the perspective of the photo, things are not clear enough to consider it real or fake.
it is an official photo purportedly of the lunar surface. therefore all of the reasons listed above for it's authenticity or lack thereof do apply.
Post a Comment
<< Home