Did Architects and Engineers Predict That the WTC Towers Would Go Down?
From PBS, May 2002:
Funny to hear those shills say how they and their colleagues knew the towers would come down.
TOM BEARDEN: Until the Twin Towers of New York's World Trade Center disintegrated, no modern steel skyscraper had ever collapsed.
David Childs is a prominent New York architect who is working on the redevelopment of ground zero. He was an eyewitness to the disaster.
DAVID CHILDS, Architect: Well, I was shocked when they fell down, quite frankly. I was standing at the window when I saw this young man who works with me with this... this look of horror on his face, a very young man, and he said, "Will they fall down?" I said, "Absolutely not."
TOM BEARDEN: In fact, the entire architectural and engineering communities were stunned.
Funny to hear those shills say how they and their colleagues knew the towers would come down.
posted by spooked at 8:18 AM
3 Comments:
which shills knew they would come down? anyone who *knew* the towers would come down must be perps, or shills for the perps...
I have seen shills at various places say they knew the towers would come down, and in two cases, they claimed they were architects/engineers and that not only did they know but that their whole firm knew the towers would come down.
This happened at this site in the comments section a couple of months ago, in fact, with a guy who claimed he was an architect from South Africa.
That is all quite meaningless. Anyone can claim, years later, what they "said" at the time.
RE that JREF/CIA shill:
In reality, in S. Africa, this USA event/story would not even have gone live!! Or have had busy architects in S.A. glued to their TV sets about something happening in USA. And now I realize the time difference--wouldn't someone in S. Africa likely be asleep?!
That shill lied about everything he said. It's like so many "plane witnesses" turning out to have "seen impact"--but only on TV. Whereas the fireman, I quoted recently, saw the jet FLYBY the tower, and the regime tried to get him to change his words.
The media knew not to air, live on 9/11, the builders of the towers that they could have found quickly, and who would have said what is on record:
The towers were built to withstand a similar head-on impact from a 707, and likely several of them. The structure was likened to "a mosquito net that would not be significantly adversely affected if a pencil went through one or more areas." Of course, CGI planes make so little impact, that Prainmath can stand, or duck, right next to one going in to his office and go unscathed happily ever after. But the buildign will "collapse", an hour later anyway. (Especially if it's nuked.)
As if.
BTW, this article
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/boeing_707_767.html
comapres the size, fuel capacities etc. of the 707 and 767. The 707 flew faster than the 767 (except for the CGI version of the 767 which was supersonic). NIST lied and used the smallest, oldest version of the 707 (1958), when the WTC was built in the 1970's and the larger version would have been used as the model for possible impact in NYC--near major airports.
Anonymous Physicist
Post a Comment
<< Home