Zdenek P. Bazant: Alpha Shill for the Official WTC Collapse Story-- Part II
His first paper on the WTC:
So IMMEDIATELY after 9/11, this Bazant guy submits a paper supporting the official story of the WTC collapses.
How could he have possibly done any serious scientific investigation on the WTC events and written a paper in just ONE day-- particularly given how traumatic the events of 9/11 were for everyone?
Why was Bazant in such a rush to publish this paper???
At minimum, this shows shoddy science and unseemly desire for notoriety.
At most, it suggests something more sinister-- and begs the question: did Bazant actually write the paper BEFORE 9/11?
One scientific critique of Bazant's paper is here. Basically, the paper is quite flawed-- making flawed assumptions and greatly over-simplifying what happened.
Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse?—Simple Analysis
Zdenek P. Bazant, F. ASCE, and Yong Zhou
Abstract: This paper presents a simplified approximate analysis of the overall collapse of the towers ofWorld Trade Center in New York on September 11, 2001. The analysis shows that if prolonged heating caused the majority of columns of a single floor to lose their load carrying capacity, the whole tower was doomed.
The original version with Eqs. 1 and 2 was originally submitted to ASCE on September 13, 2001..
So IMMEDIATELY after 9/11, this Bazant guy submits a paper supporting the official story of the WTC collapses.
How could he have possibly done any serious scientific investigation on the WTC events and written a paper in just ONE day-- particularly given how traumatic the events of 9/11 were for everyone?
Why was Bazant in such a rush to publish this paper???
At minimum, this shows shoddy science and unseemly desire for notoriety.
At most, it suggests something more sinister-- and begs the question: did Bazant actually write the paper BEFORE 9/11?
One scientific critique of Bazant's paper is here. Basically, the paper is quite flawed-- making flawed assumptions and greatly over-simplifying what happened.
posted by spooked at 8:23 AM
5 Comments:
The analysis shows that if prolonged heating caused the majority of columns of a single floor to lose their load carrying capacity, the whole tower was doomed.
what prolonged heating? wtc2 was destroyed after suffering a minor campfire-like smolder for less than an hour.
the towers did not fall on 9/11
"""why did a total collapse occur? The cause was the dynamic consequence of the prolonged heating of the steel columns to very high temperature...the conflagration, caused by the aircraft fuel spilled into the structure, causes the steel of the columns to be exposed to sustained temperatures apparently exceeding 800°C."""
aircraft fuel - as if. the total amount of fuel in a real 767 is less volume than the average backyard swimming pool - and it would have burned off in a single flash outside of the tower, as was repeatedly shown by CNN.
800°C - as if.
help, it is 800°C in here!
The original version with Eqs. 1 and 2 was originally submitted to ASCE on September 13, 2001..
Maybe Bazant is a psychic who drinks too much coffee!
I think that Bazant's "report" was only written so that those such as sword_of_"truth" can feel good about deceiving themselves.
Hey is that the very same ASCE who totally lied about the 9/11 pentagon event?
The ASCE's Pentagon Building Performance Report
It's not just that Bazant submitted the paper on or BEFORE 9/11, the "9/13 in press" that the pdf doc proclaims means the following:
Normally, regarding a submission, a Journal's peer reviewers take weeks or months to recieve, review, and sometimes request corrections--such as with this claptrap "article."
The "9/13 In Press" statement for this article makes it virtually certain that this claptrap, and soon-to-be "dogma", was not only likely submitted before-hand, but "Approved" before-hand.
It's later alterations probably relate not to needing to change the bogus "Physics", and ludicrous assumptions, (more to come), but relate to the PTB's beloved Plausible Deniability, as to what was seen and videoed, and towing the official line-to-be. I.e., just exactly how, and how much, the collective bunch of liars (OCT, NIST, Bazant, Seffen, ASCE "Journal" Editor/Publisher, etc.) were willing to lie and obfuscate.
Anonymous Physicist
If he were REALLY a scientist and researcher, he would have made a model out of cinder blocks and chicken wire...
Post a Comment
<< Home