Humint Events Online: New York City Was Nuked on 9/11

Sunday, December 30, 2007

New York City Was Nuked on 9/11

10 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

According to sources who worked with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) at Ground Zero on and after 911, residents of southern Manhattan and rescue and clean-up workers involved in the recovery operations at the site of the former World Trade Center are experiencing an unusually high rate of non-Hodgkin lymphoma -- a cancer that is common among individuals who have been exposed to extremely high levels of ionizing radiation, such as that from nuclear blasts and major nuclear reactor leaks. (Wayne Madsen, 9/12/06)

maybe chad should ask FEMA what their qualifications are!

8:16 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Its always been obvious you don't have the lunatic-idiot market cornered in this world.

8:42 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The FBI uses polygraphs to eliminate suspects ... Stoelting UltraScribe AT Polygraph 5 Ch. Lie Detector

ADX Florence
USP Leavenworth
USP Marion

8:47 PM  
Blogger Chad said...

So wait. Now FEMA. The FEDERAL Emergency Management Agency is blowing the whistle on the FEDERAL government's nuking of the WTC? Oh, nope! Sorry. Reading Comprehension 101. Madsen is the one drawing the nuke conclusion. Not FEMA.

And NHL has numerous causes and numerous reasons one could be at risk. It is in no way an indication nukes were used. Here is a list of people who are most at risk for NHL. For those of you too lazy to click a link, please take note of this:

Environmental exposure. Exposure to agricultural pesticides or fertilizers, solvents and other chemicals, rubber processing, asbestos, and arsenic increases the risk of developing NHL.

Hmmm.... Wasn't there asbestos in the towers? Odd....

On a side note, for everyone here that believes I'm a paid government shill. Don't you think that if the information you were disseminating on this blog was that dangerous the NWO would find a way to shut the site down or silence the writers instead of just sending a shill or two to post comments?

9:27 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The "a.p." uses the very same tactics that right-wing shills use! I just realized that. S/he ridicules, takes things out of context, attacks posters personally rather than what the poster said, and even lies about what posters have said.

A.P.: Are YOU a shill? A Gov't infiltrator? Or do you just have poor manners, lack of respect for others, and an exaggerated sense of self-worth?

10:13 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

AP is a 7th grader who gets his rocks off by making up long, convoluted posts and cherry picking big words from a library book. if he was any kind of real physicist he's have his work published and he'd pass on his qualifications - of which he has none.

10:50 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

So said the people named "anonymous"

12:29 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi Jim,

Did you mean to include the person whose username is "anonymous physicist"? The reason I'm asking is because I seriously doubt that she or he would have the integrity to admit that the above observations about her/him are pretty much right on the money.

11:27 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

When I look at videos of the WTC being destroyed, and then read what the 9-11 firemen and others had to say about "incredible heat that lasted for 100+ days", and then read about the size of the dust particles, and then also read about the high percentage of thyroid and other cancers that are associated with radioactivity poisoning, then I have to admit that I believe that NYC was nuked on 9-11.
What other conclusion should I draw?

12:48 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well said, seven!

Your logic is impeccable.

1:49 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Powered by Blogger