Completely Burned Cars in the Underground WTC Parking Complex; More Repoerts of Molten Metal
This post from Kevin Ryan is pretty interesting, though the pictures are hard to evaluate without knowing exactly where in the complex they were taken. But this is probably the most interesting part:
Someone really needs to tell Kevin Ryan that thermite can't explain this!
The China Syndrome driven by fizzled micronukes can however explain it. And nuclear radiation can also explain the cancer in the iron worker.
The volunteer fireman who sent the photos told me that an iron worker took them. When the fireman asked the iron worker photographer, who is now dying of cancer, for more information, he said this.
“He said access to the garages was extremely restricted. I asked him if he saw any molten metal, he told me there were pools of molten metal under the pile and in the basements. He even said that there were spots that water had pooled up and was just bubbling like a pot of boiling water with molten metal underneath, like in the Nat/Geo movies of underwater volcanic lava flows.”
Someone really needs to tell Kevin Ryan that thermite can't explain this!
The China Syndrome driven by fizzled micronukes can however explain it. And nuclear radiation can also explain the cancer in the iron worker.
posted by spooked at 8:28 AM
3 Comments:
Alas, there seems to be little doubt but that Kevin Ryan is intel controlled. This post at 911blogger, and his earlier posts indicate this, as follows.
In this post, he tries to attribute properties to thermite, that it doesn’t have. His beloved thermite (whichever version) he claims is both “exploding and scorching.” Perhaps he writes this because I have written that if some conventional explosive puts out its energy as a great explosive--which all versions of thermite are not--then it wouldn’t be able to have great temperatures, certainly not for the required length of TIME needed for “scorching.” So Ryan here simply declares thermite to have these dual properties, because they are both needed for his/Jones’ Hangout of “Thermite did the WTC destruction and thermite caused the great heat, and molten temperatures, for weeks and months afterwards”--in reality, the China Syndrome.
I have many times pointed out that thermite would have cooled off in minutes or hours, NOT weeks and months. It is beyond ludicrous that Jones and his people can make such a claim for thermite and not be laughed out of all blogs, etc. Ryan’s quote from the fireman’s quote of the cancer-stricken iron worker cleverly leaves out just how long after 9/11 did the iron worker see molten metal. Ryan must leave this out because the longer after 9/11 such sightings were, the more ludicrous it becomes that thermite would have a temperature it may NEVER have been able to attain, let alone for weeks and months after 9/11. Ryan’s piece mentions the OCT, and even DEW, as well as his beloved thermite. But Ryan does not mention what actually did that to the cars in the garage, as well as vaporize a 50-ton steel press and made a 300 pound steel and concrete door in the basement into a thin “aluminum foil-like” entity.
These things all demonstrate that they could only have occurred from the million degree temps and neutron bombardment emanating from a nuke.
Furthermore, looking at some of the earlier posts in “Kevin Ryan’s blog” at 911blogger, we see that he has praised the intel physicist, Greg Jenkins. I have here denounced Jenkins use of bogus Physics. Now I have shown that DEW is evidence-free and used proper Physics to show that Directed Energy Weapons could not possibly have done the WTC destruction. But Jenkins used bogus Physics. E.g., he said it couldn’t have been DEW because it would have used more than “an Earth’s worth of power” in the time frame it would have operated. Then I pointed out that Jenkins would claim that nukes are not real or possible, because in the microsecond that they release their power, they are indeed putting out more power than the rest of the Earth put together. Let Jenkins tell the survivors of Hiroshima that nukes can’t be real because they would put out “more than an Earth’s worth of power.”
So Ryan’s praising of Jenkins tells you everything. Jones’ set of scientists and engineers are ALL suspect, if they remain in his group, and under his control; putting out their impossible Thermite Hangout, that cannot explain the WTC destruction, nor the China Syndrome for six months afterwards.
Some of the comments after Ryan’s piece are telling. One person relates that only the FBI (or other Feds) had access to that garage after the 1993 bombing--also done by the American regime. This lets you know who were the only ones who could have brought in the nukes used therein! Sorry intel agents--there goes the “Reds” or “Zionists” did it Hangouts.
Then there was a comment by Plaguepuppy (aka Jeff King), that the scene is “consistent with a brief exposure to very high temperatures.” Was PP indicating nukes, or going along with thermite? If the former, does he know that no one is allowed to mention nukes at 911blogger? And had to indicate this cryptically, or has PP gone over to thermite?
Please reply here, Plaguepuppy. Thanks.
We know that 911blogger in general does not allow mention of nukes, and slants everything away from that--which was/is the entire M.O. for all of the O.C.T., DEW, and Thermite Hangouts.
Does anyone here know who runs/controls 911blogger and what their background is?
Anonymous Physcist
greg jenkins - what a guy!
he derived some foolish "deceleration calculations" based on a stupid NIST diagram of a 767 already inside of a WTC, without explaining how the hollow aluminum tube (with a plastic nosecone) that is a real 767 managed to defeat the massive steel columns of said WTC.
what a guy!
It is very telling that the iron worker now has cancer.
From the moment when I understood there was a China Syndrome at the WTC, I thought that the most likely victims-to-be of radiation-induced cancers will be the responders that were among the relatively few that were allowed entry to the underground areas that contained the molten metal.
At these very hot spots, the sand/earth and water hosing activities may have been untenable. So these radiation-lowering measures either were not employed, or were less effective at the deep undergound areas. And I thought the greatest cancer incidence will come from those workers who had access to these areas. Also, according to my fizzled nukes hypothesis, more radioactive bomb fragments are more likely to be in the basements of WTC 1,2,7!
Sadly, this works out well for the monstrous regime. People who witnessed the China Syndrome will pay the ultimate price; and won't be around long to describe it!
Perhaps this is even why this iron worker is now handing off photos and describing what he saw. He may not be around much longer.
But the clever intel agencies have done their job well. By creating this Steven Jones-controlled group, such cancer victims/responders aren't handing off their evidence to anyone who would tell the world what really happened!
Anonymous Physicist
Post a Comment
<< Home