WTC Demolition: the Missing Building Contents Conundrum
(click to enlarge)
Here we see the street west of the north tower, shortly after 9/11. A large piece of the west wall-- a massive wall of steel columns-- of the north tower has broken away from the tower as it went down, and fallen en masse onto the street. Similar sections of the other three walls peeled off the tower as it went down.
But wait, there is something missing! We seem to be missing the contents of the 110 story building that should have spilled out as the wall came off and then fallen on top of the wall. Where did all the STUFF go? There was in fact, a lot of STUFF in that huge tower-- not just the massive structural elements, but thousands and thousands of other large bulky objects: tables, desks, chairs, book shelves with books, computers, printers, filing cabinets, office doors, elevator doors, sinks, toilets, air conditioners, pipes, air ducts, electrical equipment, etc.
There are two things that could have happened to all this "stuff"-- either it went straight down into the footprint of the towers, or it was commuted into minutely small particles and it blew away as dust and smoke.
If we assume all this "stuff" went into the footprint of the towers and was crushed into a small compact debris pile, this disproves acollapse, as a massive and chaotic top-down collapse would never cause all these objects to go straight down into the footprint of the towers.
If we assume this "stuff" was commuted into very fine particles and was blown away as smoke and dust, this is essentially impossible in the absence of massive demolition. If the walls were blown out, the building contents should have blown out without being crushed down in the footprints of the tower.
Either way, we are left with demolition as the explanation.
posted by spooked at 11:58 AM
4 Comments:
Good reminder, Spooked.
And we should never forget that nearly half the nearly 3000 people who died in the towers were also vaporized!
Think about this! People weighing say 100-200 pounds (and some undoubtedly weighing much more) did not even leave an ounce of their bodies in the wreckage. All the responders were ordered to stop and collect any small piece of anything that even looked remotely like it could be the remains of a human being. So I think it is a safe assumption that even an ounce of a human being would have been collected. So nearly 1500 people do not leave an ounce of themselves. Clearly they were vaporized. Now no explosive except for nuclear ones can do this. Thermite does not vaporize people, thermobarics do not vaporize people. Only the million degree temperature, and/or neutron bombardment of a nuke, can vaporize people, and all the missing furniture, and other elements, including much steel, within the towers.
In my article on disproving thermobarics (and all conventional explosives), which is here
http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/2007/09/could-911-have-been-done-with.html
I highlighted something that the S. Jones intel hangout collaborators want people not to realize. While some conventional explosives might reach a high enough temperature to possibly vaporize tiny amounts of things, they could not do this in any appreciable sense. This is because of the Physics of the matter.
To appreciably vaporize much mass, either an “extraordinarily high temperature” must be attained, or penetrating neutron bombardment must occur. Conventional explosives, like thermite or thermobarics, barely reach a high enough temperature for a brief moment during their explosions. But in such a case, much TIME is needed for appreciable vaporization of the towers' elements. An example I cited is boiling water. The stove you put your pot of water on, has a higher temperature than the boiling point of water--maybe even twice as high. But does your water boil instantly? No, because the stove top is only somewhat higher than the boiling point, and the thermal rays do not penetrate en masse, so it will take some TIME to boil the water. But if the temperature were vastly higher than the vaporization point of people and/or metal, vaporization would occur instantly. Likewise with something (like energetic neutrons) that penetrates deeply and instantly into the water--or people and metal, etc.--instant vaporization could also occur.
This is just a reminder, that thermite and/or thermobarics could not have led to total vaporization of 1500 people, and the missing furniture and metal etc., in the towers that was vaporized. And any intel assets that claim that thermite and/or thermobarics could account for all the massive, missing mass are obvious intel assets.
And “speaking” of dust and tower contents and where they went, we should never forget the following. The regime’s chief engineering intel asset, Z.P. Bazant, has claimed, in his published articles incorporated into the O.C.T., that 80% of the mass of the towers was found within the footprint of the towers. (Where is it in the photo, Z.P.?) And the other 20% was within a very short distance further away from the footprint, right there at the WTC. (Where is it in the photo, Z.P.?) This is despite the proof that massive parts were flung further away, thick ash was photographed a mile or more away, and massive amounts were seen floating away! The latter jives with what happens in a nuke whereby particles are “commuted” down to 10 nanometer size.
Furthermore I PROVED THAT BAZANT COULD EASILY BE CONVICTED OF FRAUD, as the source for his claims for having a false, large size for the smallest dust particle size, in fact, cited a much smaller size for the smallest dust particles, than he claims they cited. He could also be convicted of fraud with photos such as the one here, as clearly we don’t have 80-100% of the mass of the towers right there.
My articles proving the published articles on the “collapses” are devoid of correct Physics, Mathematics and truth are at
http://www.bloglines.com/blog/spooked911
Spooked’s articles on the same, are also there.
And the laughable, evidence-free DDT (DEW Disinfo Theory)?
Well the desperation of the MI5/6 agents who dreamt this hangout up, is evidenced by the latest joke from London/Langley, via its agents, Wood, and Johnson. This is the hurricane theory. They are now claiming (I think) that Hurricane Erin had something to do with providing energy for the evidence-free DEW. Now as this hurricane appears to not have been closer than 500-1000 miles at that time, this is a joke. It’s even funnier as they cite the fact that this hurricane was ignored--therefore it must have been involved?! Flash to the intel idiots: The east coast of the U.S has many hurricanes at that time of the year that move up, parallel to the coast. When these hurricanes remain far away from the coast during their entire, brief existences, they never get played up in the press.
It is appropriate to claim this hurricane for DEW, as DEW on 9/11 at the WTC is a fiction only existing in the “Windmills of the Minds” of the MI5/6 agents who are pushing this disinfo to hide the nuking of the WTC on 9/11.
Anonymous Physicist
"Jet fuel? That's a good one!"
the entire Wood DEW premise revolves around the claim that the destruction of the WTC was 'cold', and drew it's power from a supposed hidden technology.
a hurricane - too funny!
the fact that the DEW gang and the thermite gang have not even once explained why it was not a nuclear demo is very telling in and of itself.
You remain the single dumbest piece of mental excrement in the entire world.
Post a Comment
<< Home