If You Set Off a Bomb In the Upper Levels of a Large Tower, Is It Possible It WOULDN'T Oscillate?
Steven Jones is being very silly:
3. How do you account for NIST's detailed analysis of the oscillatory motion including damping of the So. Tower following hit? How does one get the Tower to oscillate like that in the absence of a plane-hit? Note that Momentum must be conserved in ANY collision. A Boeing 767-200 traveling at high speed has enormous momentum, which can be calculated using P = MV. Similarly, explosives blowing OUT the side of the building would have some momentum -- but have you calculated how much? In other words, how much explosives (by weight) does one need to use, and at what velocity of the "exhaust" gases, to equal the enormous momentum of a high-speed B-767?
posted by spooked at 8:04 PM
5 Comments:
Nothing that S. Jones has said is more ludicrous than his using thermite to explain the great heat at the WTC weeks and months later.
When thermite cools off within minutes! (At least he knows better than to try to deny the heat, as there is too much proof.)
As for the "DEW"huggers who outrageously claim there was no heat during and after 9/11--which includes this ACE who has no trouble directly communicating with Bazant and Jones, giving the op away--see my next article on the review of William Tahil's book.
There is even a photo in his book of a rescue dog having to wear special shoes otherwise he couldn't walk around the WTC. And there is a photo and story of the melted mass of bullets from WTC6 (nuke). Some 43 days later, the great heat still GENERATED (China Syndrome) made one or more bullets discharge and hit a nearby responder in the face.
Of course, I have had so many articles proving this, but I am not sure I have relayed that I visited the site some 6 weeks later myself. From the closest we were allowed then, some blocks away, the smoldering toxins burned my eyes right away and I couldn't stay long.
Everyone in New York knows of the great heat there for months! I am talking about millions of people!
Fascinating that the intel operators such as Wood, Reynolds, Ace, etc. go with the ludicrous "molecular dissociation clouds" or "Hutchison" or "fuming" whenever water was hosed onto the hot rubble pile, and so on.
DEW and thermite remain the two stupidest intel Hangouts ever! Obvious desperate hangouts to try to hide the nuking of the WTC, and the China Syndrome Aftermath.
That one proponent of one of these two hangouts communicates with the other "side" only shows they have the same supervisor in Langley, Ft. Meade, or London.
Anonymous Physicist
I usually don't like being part of a mutual intel operator discussion, but...
If said NIST oscillations were actual, I have addressed this in my articles numerous times. The massive sub-basement explosion, as detailed by Engineer Mike Pecoraro that I have indicated highly likely was nuclear, (vaporized a 50-ton steel press, and 300 pound concrete/steel door shriveled up like foil), and was timed to go off when the top had its explosion (CGI "plane hit".)
The basement explosion also led to Felipe David's melted, hanging skin even though in David's words, THERE WAS NO FIRE. Also I have detailed that there was EMP at the time of the basement nuke. And also Cathy T, a mile North, stated that at that moment, books fell off her bookcase! So Hell yes there were oscillations, NIST is telling us there was a significant Earthquake then! Due to the basement nuke.
But we won't find this answer transmitted to Jones, by "ACE".
Orders are orders, and NOCs are NOCs.
Anonymous Physicist
my observation about the 50 ton press:
when a press is referred to as a "50 ton press" or "20 ton press" etc, they are referring to the press's ability and not to the weight of the press.
a "50 ton press" probably doesn't weigh more than a ton or 2.
but they are made out of steel and it would still take a nuclear explosion to vaporize one.
Why do you people only post under the username "anonymous"?
Jus' wonderin'.
And who's asking 7:14?
Post a Comment
<< Home