The Real McCain
A self-admitted war criminal and lots of disturbing questions about what exactly he did when he was held captive by the North Vietnamese. While it's clear that McCain is no "war hero", it's quite possible he was even a traitor to the US-- giving sensitive military information to the enemy.
posted by spooked at 8:03 AM
37 Comments:
S911
In your defense of the feckless one, you said "he doesn't mind useful comments at all,". You've also claimed that people who disagree with his opinions (which he calls proven facts) should refute his arguments, yet whenever that has been attempted, you've deleted them.
I distinctly remember all kinds of logical arguments and links to sources which provide additional evidence that the phony physicist's
claims about MLK, RFK, and JFK are not sustainable in light of the evidence (or even common sense).
She has been invited to post her claims on the most respected forums where serious researchers could see them and provide feedback or refutations, and what happened?
She failed and refused to address any of the contrary evidence, claimed that her evidence was eyewitnesses (who have also given statements to the contrary of what your doppleganger said) and said that other claims were things that she had read in a book.
She failed and refused the invitation to present her views (things she claimed that she has proven and are not merely her opinions) on forums where serious researchers exchange views about MLK, RFK, JFK and other matters.
Her excuse? She said they're all CIA sites.
So, don't try to make it sound like your little a.p. poster is not deserving of being mocked.
And don't try to make it sound like
no one has refuted her claims with
evidence-based, logical argument.
And don't try to make it sound like the only reason why you won't acknowledge the above is because she is not what she claims and it's
your duty to protect the weak and especially her, since you invited her to post on your site and besides, due to her medical condition, she is not in any condition to deal with proof to the contrary of her silliness.
BTW - do YOU know of ANY CIA web sites other than their official web site?
Can you name even ONE forum where
MLK, JFK, and RFK related issues are discussed that is run by CIA?
Didn't think so. And, no, ones you make up don't count.
people who disagree with his opinions (which he calls proven facts) should refute his arguments,
when have you ever refuted anything? all you have ever said is, "no serious JFK researcher believes that..."
you sound like charlie brown's parents:
"blah blah blah"
There she goes again!
I've refuted every one of your FALSE
claims about the JFK assassination.
Just yesterday I pointed out how absurd it is to claim that Greer shot JFK.
Since you seem to have a short-term memory problem, here are a few of the reasons why your claim cannot possibly be true:
1. Because of Connolly's position in the limo, a pistol shot would have hit him.
2. A pistol shot from the front seat would have hit the back of it.
3. Analysis of the extant film of the assassination shows that Greer
did not have anything in his left hand. Not at the moment when you claim he shot JFK nor before that point in time or afterwards.
4. If Greer had fired a pistol, there would be a recoil action but
none is visible even in the most
clear versions of the Z film.
5. Greer would have to have been insane to knowingly put himself in a position where bullets would be flying around within inches of his head...and one actually damaged the
mirror on the windshield.
6. Greer turned around twice in the limo. The turn during which you claim he shot JFK has been timed and found to be such a fast turn that it would be physically impossible for him to have moved his left hand into a position from which he could have fired a pistol while making an almost superhuman
turn back and then returning to his driving position.
Of all the unknowns and puzzles that happened on Elm St. in Dallas,
one that ISN'T a puzzle is the claim that Greer shot JFK while driving the limo.
I assumed that you simply don't know much about the assassination, and you don't. But, I wanted to give you the opportunity to present your claim to some serious researchers who post on the two most prominent JFK forums. I gave you the names of those forums, and one of the reasons why I did that is so that you could visit them and
read some of the research that debunks your claims. I thought that maybe you simply didn't realize your own ignorance and that by reading what some of the leading experts have said about it - you might gracefully back down rather than suffer the embarrassment of being seen as a charlatan and fool who espouses claims that no serious researcher gives the least credence to, and for good reason.
There is much more that could be said which totally destroys your Greer-shot-JFK while driving approximately 11 mph on a street full of spectators and just in front of an overpass on which there were additional eyewitnesses who would have observed Greer shooting JFK if such a thing had happened.
You obviously can't prove your case
and that is why you've resorted to
ridicule and making even more outlandish claims that slander the reputation of the world's most serious JFK assassination researchers who have spent years studying the evidence and debating its meaning.
An honest, mature person would feel ashamed if they had done such a thing. That you don't says much about your character...as well as your ignorance about the subject.
That was not me posting above…
Now as always, everything CIA Colonel "Early Wynn" posts is a lie. Ashamed to use his Early moniker anymore because he was caught in so many lies here, like crying “Spooked you’re blocking me,” all the while he was posting!
And he takes advantage of Spooked's good nature in allowing this perpetrator to take over his blog, and LIE and LIE and LIE. And
HE is now using this blog as a CIA blog, to promote their LIES.
He proves by "protesting too much" that his orders--like those of the CIA-run JFKtroof forums--was from the outset of the existence of this blog--to patrol here and counter any truth that might appear here.
Again this vermin did not respond, to a commenter here, as to who he says killed JFK. As I predicted, he currently goes with his “all the unknowns and puzzles.” Translation: "we don’t know, we can never know, we only know who didn't." Once again proving why he is here!! Of course, as I proved with all the eyewitness quotes, everyone at the immediate scene said the driver did it. And this is why the CIA then started a whole industry of fake authors, books, articles, “researchers”, forums etc.
One thing he is right about, is that Spooked may not have studied the JFK Assassination, otherwise Spooked would stop him from posting all his LIES all over this blog. E.g., any real research would indicate to any non-CIA person that virtually all eyewitnesses said that the limo was brought to a STOP. (See Twyman’s book, or Fetzer’s.) The Zapruder film was proven to be a dupe of itself, whereby the film is run against its own background to appear to show an 11 mph, while all the eyewitnesses said it was brought to a halt. This thing says Connolly [sic] would have been hit, Apparently this senile creature is so used to lying/countering Bill Cooper, that he forgot I have shown that Greer DID first hit Connally before killing President Kennedy. So this CIA vermin just repeats all the CIA lies. (It’s Connally, Colonel, not Connolly, BTW.)
This CIA agent actually claims that the only CIA website is their own official one. They run all the 911truth forums, the laughable Apollo “debunking sites, all the MSM sites, and so much more.
ONLY THE CIA ITSELF WOULD SAY THE ONLY SITE/BLOG/FORUM THEY RUN IS THEIR OWN!!
Remember when it came out that fake “liberal” Dailykos guy was a CIA agent?
Former CIA director, William Colby admitted they control all the MSM years ago!
I could easily refute all his CIA-lies, but as Bill Cooper did not, I certainly will not. People who can see through the stupid lies bought Cooper’s book by the millions, and listened to him on the radio--which is why they assassinated Cooper just after 9/11.
As Spooked said, this thing “protests too much,” and will never stop, until brought to Justice for all his own crimes--or completely blocked here, as he should be. This vermin has all the CIA-run forums to post his crap. It shows that the CIA murderers do not want a single word of truth anywhere on the Planet. He still refuses to tell us where he was posted on Nov. 22, 1963, while speaking fondly and personally of JFK assassin “Bill” Greer. Did this Colonel know him there and then?
Tell us “Early”. How does a West Point Army graduate, end up being an Air Force Colonel, unless CIA all his foul life??? Now senile, but still ordered to lurk and lie about all the assassinations for the murderous regime, indicates he was involved in them!
All of them Col. “Early,” or just President Kennedy? Where were you posted on November 22, 1963?
Anonymous Physicist
ha ha Col. Charlie Brown's parents!
SPOOKED
How much more evidence do you need to
see that your anonymous fave cannot
defend her claims about JFK.
We could go right on down the line
to MLK and RFK and I can guarantee
you that the same thing will happen
because that's what those kind of
people do. Whenever they post
BS and someone who knows the facts
calls them on it, they resort to
the exact tactics that a.p.
uses.
Come to think of it, a.p. seems
to be uncannily like certain SHILLS
who post at DU. I'm now beginning
to serious consider the possibility
that maybe old a.p. is using the
excuse of her alleged declining
mental and physical condition as
a cover story for her real vocation
of being a paid SHILL...whether
from a government intelligence
service or a private one like those
at the Larouche group or maybe the
Scientology organization.
I can see elements of both in her
various rambling diatribes which
she modestly calls
"ultimate truths" but to most of
us are more accurately called
HORSE PUCKEY.
ACHTUNG! ACHTUNG!
Colonel Wynngbat:
For posting dummkopf Sheisse, you are ordered to RETURN to CIA/GestapoHQ at Langley.
They have found out where you were on 11/22/63!
Return to Langley sofort, Herr Colonel!
ACHTUNG! ACHTUNG!
Woweezowee!
I'm not the anonymous physicist, but
ain't it a hoot that he got caught
telling little white ones and like
my five year old, tries to slither out of his fix by name calling and
other trash talk, but he doesn't even TRY to refute the evidence of his
laughable lies about President
Kennedy's assassination.
Hear, hear.
Sad, sad Colonel pretending not to be his own anonymous "Early" self. But posting more dummkopf Sheisse.
Face it, fake physicist:
YOU'VE BEEN BUSTED.
You began your "career" here using a name which you thought would give you
"prestige by association" with real
physicists.
By pretending to have credentials you lack, you made yourself suspect from the get-go.
A real physicist, just as any other honest person, would admit when they've been shown to be wrong.
A real physicist wouldn't try to evade the truth, but you can throw all of the smoke bombs you want, and maybe SPOOKED will continue to
give you cover (although even he eventually figured out the truth about Dr. Woods and Dr. Griffin and abandoned their claims about 9/11).
The fact remains that your "case" has been utterly destroyed and you know it.
A real physicist expects and welcomes challenge to his or her
theories. They don't try to change the subject in the face of logical response and when they are presented with evidence that renders their theories (in this case, that Greer shot JFK) to be meritless, most real physicists
accept that they may have erred.
I can't speak for SPOOKED or anyone else here, but I will remind you
and anyone else who is interested
that BLINDNESS IS NOT a VIRTUE when you have good eyes.
A real physicist, just as any other honest person, would admit when they've been shown to be wrong.
the problem with this statement is:
you have NOT proven that AP is wrong - you have merely contradicted him, a far cry from "shown to be wrong".
a real physicist uses science and math to explain his reasoning, which AP has repeatedly done as pertaining to the WTC destruction and subsequent china syndrome at ground zero, which your continual harping about AP's JFK posit only serves as a distraction from - is that your intent; to distract?
hey Charlie Brown's Parents, "blah blah blah".
The EVIDENCE, common sense, logic, and greater knowledge of the entire
assassination scene proves that you are wrong.
Since you never proved your baseless theory to begin with, there was no need to prove it wrong.
You are a fake and not a very good one, either.
You began your "career" here by being deceptive, and deception is the essence of lying.
You have no cred - except with Spooked.
You can't name any serious JFK assassination researcher who believes your BS. Anyone who thinks that BILL COOPER was a serious researcher and that his theories should be given serious consideration has only to do a simple search on the late Mr. Cooper and they will know all they need to know to assess HIS veracity. YOURS is little better.
If you were a real physicist who wanted to be taken seriously AS a real physicist, you wouldn't hide your identity and you would make your credentials known so that they can be verified. But you aren't a real physicist. You're as fake as a three dollar bill.
As A.P. wrote, we do apparently have the CIA trying to take over this blog, as they can't stand the truth of the assassinations of President Kennedy, Robert Kennedy and Rev. King being written about anywhere. It's blatent.
I guess A.P. is rightabout this guy being there too, and part of it.
How does a West Point Army Grad become an Air Force Colonel, unless he is CIA?
You got that right, girlyman. The TRUTH about your lies concerning the assassinations of JFK, RFK, and MLK
have caused you to flail about for
any kind of dumbshift you can think of to try to change the subject.
Face it. Your crackpot theories are
BS and you are too cowardly to even try and defend them substantively, because you know now that the truth will trip you up again and again.
Not one single person here (out of the 100s who visit this site daily)
has said they believe your lies. Only Spooked supports you and that is his right, and for all I know, his contractual obligation.
What is the official CIA view of this document which seems to prove that Oswald was CIA/ONI?
http://bp0.blogger.com/_yK7-eKYFGho/RofRqGDzSWI/AAAAAAAACIw/OvzH5ml4bMM/s1600-h/OSWALD_CIA.gif
Early, who earlier said no one comes here anymore, now says "hundreds" do.
And it seems that A.P. proved you wrong many times. With your lies about the King assassination and that a judge and jury found the government did it, A.P. posted that trials results direct from the King family's website.
Above he refuted your claim of the limo going at 11 mph with references that had many eyewitnesses saying they saw the limo brought to a halt. Why should anyone waste their time with countering an obvious liar/troll and probable agent of the assassins?
This does appear to be the CIA's method of taking over a blog and when any lie is demonstrated to be such, either repeating it anyway, or coming back with new lies.
You really are a miserable little
fake who doesn't deserve further response from me or anyone else here.
Just be thankful that Spooked treats you the same way the DU Moderators
treat SHILLS on the 9/11 forum there.
But be careful, because one day, Spooked just MIGHT tell YOU that "you've made your point, now answer the questions raised about your claims".
If/when that day ever comes, you're gonna be further exposed for what you are: a dishonest poster who claims to be something she isn't, a
terrible liar who makes sweeping, outrageous claims that are laughable, ignorant about much of what is posted under your deceptive username, and most of all, a paranoid coward who is weaker than water.
Your own words above:
"You really are a miserable little
fake who doesn't deserve further response from me or anyone else here."
Great!
Just stick to this!
If not, you further prove you are a filthy liar if you ever post here again!!
It is a shame the post by Spooked was hijacked, because the article Spooked cited, written by Douglas Valentine, about John McCain, was excellent--and should be read by all.
It indicates that McCain may never have been tortured, yet he gave away important military secrets “to the enemy.” He even allowed himself to be used as a Tokyo Rose.
The author of that article, Douglas Valentine, appears to be the real deal. He was even called as a witness in the trial (that I have cited here) where the judge and jury found that the American gov’t was responsible for the assassination of the Rev. Martin Luther King, Jr.
Valentine’s website is here: http://douglasvalentine.com/index.html There are some good articles there. Valentine has written several books, including one on the notorious CIA Phoenix (mass murder and torture) Program in Vietnam.
Valentine indicated that GHW Bush’s assistant threatened Congress with MARTIAL LAW, if it did a real investigation of the crimes of the CIA!
Anonymous Physicist
It may be a shame to some, but it's not surprising that the fake physicist STILL has not answered the
points raised which show that she knows almost nothing about the JFK assassination except what the criminal lunatic Bill Cooper said that has been long dismissed as not having the least bit of plausibility.
Why won't the fake one answer the charges or even attempt to sustain her own theory about the case?
Simple. She can't answer the charges and she doesn't know enough about the evidence to attempt to sustain her bizarre theory.
Poor thing. But, it's her own fault and no one should feel sorry for her.
still with the Charlie Brown's parents?
"blah blah blah"!
Above I posted this:
Your own words above:
"You really are a miserable little
fake who doesn't deserve further response from me or anyone else here."
Great!
Just stick to this!
If not, you further prove you are a filthy liar if you ever post here again!!"
So Early swore that he would not post here anymore, and then posts the usual stupid lies.
So once again, he PROVED himself to be a LIAR with every single post he makes!
QED
A.P.
McCain has anger issues
hypocrite POW McCain calls POW/MIA family members "whiners vultures & lunatic fringe"
who opposed health care for uninsured children?
The bush/McCain challenge
The Real McCain!
stupid McCain graduates 5th from the bottom of his class
Would someone please give the anonymous fake physicist a lesson
in reading comprehension.
WHY won't the anonymous fake physicist respond to the questions which raise doubts about the bizarre
claim made by Bill Cooper (criminal &
lunatic combined) and supported by
the fake physicist - that a SSA is who killed JFK?
Is it because the fake physicist is now trying to back away from her BS
by ignoring the questions, throwing
smoke bombs, and spreading even more DISINFO about anyone who questions her BS - but doesn't want
people to realize that's what she's
doing?
Why won't the fake physicist just ADMIT that she is wrong? Is it because that would open the floodgate and some of her other
so-called "ultimate truths" will be
revealed as nothing more than ultimate deceptions, lies, and uninformed opinions?
Why is it that the fake physicist
won't allow comments on HER opinion
pieces? Is it because she lacks confidence in them and knows that
intelligent people will ask questions that she can't answer?
Why is it that the fake physicist
can't give an argument in support of her claims about JFK, MLK, and RFK? Is it because she knows that
her claims are transparently and inherently flawed and without merit?
EXAMPLE: the fake physicist says "Greer shot JFK". Even the most amateur student of the assassination knows that there was a conspiracy, therefore such a bizarre claim as "Greer shot JFK" has to take into account the foundational issue of a conspiracy,
yet the fake physicist is either ignorant of the most basic facts (and sadly, she IS ignorant of them) or else she has a huge gap in
reasoning skills (and she DOES, so much so that her thoughts tumble out
in the manner of a six year old child trying to persuade you of something that you know isn't true).
FAKE one: answer the questions or admit defeat so we can move on to the next case (your choice, MLK or RFK). We'll get to your MOON pie
business a little bit later on.
OMG it is Charlie Brown's parents yet again with the same-old-same-old!
11:56 AM
Can YOU get her to answer the charges against her bizarre theory (which was first promoted by a nutty, prarnoid criminal named Bill Cooper)?
The fake physicist must be losing faith in her claims. That might be a sign of long-overdue humility.
Still, she needs to either PUT UP or SHUT UP. Then it's on to some of the other DISINFO she has put on the record here.
12:17 PM--
dude, chill. AP has written extensively on this topic, and given his rationale for why he thinks what he thinks. There is also the simple fact, that after speaking out publicly on the JFK ass'n, and that Greer did it, AP was poisoned and harassed by goons.
I believe AP, and his explanations have always made sense to me. I am not going to change my mind because you say he's wrong and because you make fun of him. In fact, your obstinacy on this point actually helps prove AP's point!!!
Bottom line is, if you don't like AP or that I publish his writings, just don't come here. As you say, it's not like I get such great web traffic. Surely, the internet can handle one more "nutty" website.
"There is also the simple fact, that after speaking out publicly on the JFK ass'n, and that Greer did it, AP was poisoned and harassed by goons."
dude, PLEASE. Where and when did AP speak out publicly and what is your evidence that he was "poisoned and harassed by goons"?
The late Bill Cooper cooked up the
now thoroughly discredited notion that Greer "did it". Is AP claiming to be the him? Did AP make those videos? There's no denying that x number of gullible, naive fellow paranoids bought those videos-hook, line, and sinker.
Every once in a while, someone will post the same thing on forums where
REAL NAMES are required to be used, and they are verified. I've never once read or heard of any of those
folks ever having anything done to them as a result --- unless you count the patient explanations for why that theory can't possible be true.
In the interest of being fair, objective, and honest, why are you, SPOOKED, unwilling to explain how
Greer could possibly have shot JFK?
If you believe him and his explanations, then you could do a great service to your readers by
simply laying out the case.
AP is obviously unwilling or unable to do that, so why won't YOU step up to the plate and do it for her, instead of continuing to pretend like that has already been done.
It hasn't. All you have said is that "you believe him".
You don't duck giving your well-reasoned arguments for various
aspects of 9/11 - what's the difference? She has made this claim many times, but has never explained how it could have happened, ESPECIALLY in light of the evidence to the contrary.
Be a hero, Spooked. Or, don't be a hero - just lay out the case.
Is that asking too much? It's a simple, honest request. Won't you honor it, YOU, and AP with an explanation, or are we to assume that you are little better than the disinfo agents at DU?
P.S. Will you also state categorically whether or not YOU are AP?
The unending (even though he promised to stop) sickening, lying, moronic posts here by Colonel “Early” and his Doppleganger from the CIA/JREF Swart of Schweinhund, are being made for two reasons. The first is the usual--any mention of the obvious truth of the Kennedy assassination is ordered by the murderers (CIA etc.) to be countered by their intel ASSets. Secondly the foul things written by the two Dopplegangers Swart (removed) and Early (some removed) after my Ultimate Truths, Part VII, are likely because I detailed how the bastards poisoned me for revealing that SS agent Greer fired twice first hitting Connally, then blowing Kennedy’s head out and slamming him straight back in the limo. So the perps here (Early/Swart) show that the PTB do not want my being poisoned for revealing the Ultimate Truth of the JFK assassination, to be known.
I ask that you make my poisoning known throughout the internet, to counter these filth. The rest of the article on the poisoning of Mozart, Beethoven, Karen Silkwood, rock stars, Presidents is obviously very important for all to know as well. These people deserve some Justice too!! Or at least some truth about what was done to them and why.
So please post that article everywhere. Not just at “truth forums” which are mostly run by the intel agencies, but at all blogs, forums etc., on any topic. (Contrary to the lying Col. Early, I have seen people post my Ultimate Truths articles at unrelated Sports blogs, etc., and at sites around the world.) The article to post is here:
http://anonymous-physicist.blogspot.com/2008/06/ultimate-truths-part-vii-poisoning.html
The life you save may be your own, as well!
Thank you.
Anonymous Physicist
Dear Fake Physicist:
You're also a comedian.
You just said "I detailed how the bastards poisoned me for revealing that SS agent Greer fired twice first hitting Connally, then blowing Kennedy’s head out and slamming him straight back in the limo."
But you did no such thing. You merely cited the ORIGINATOR'S claims of that now long-debunked theory. You STILL can't lay out a case for your theory because there is no case that can be plausibly made.
The late criminal and mentally unstable Bill Cooper cooked up the theory that YOU claim to have originated.
HE made some money from the small but rabid group of paranoids who don't have a clue about the actual facts and evidence of JFK's assassination.
It isn't known what percentage of those fools are members of Survivalist and Milita organizations, but I'd bet a good many, if not most of them are members.
And those kinds of ignorant rednecks are the very people that the Bill Coopers of this world are all too happy to accommodate by selling them books and videos which claim the kind of outrageous and unrealistic theories
that gullible, paranoid rednecks want to believe and will buy so they can "prove" to their friends that know they the inside stuff that educated, informed, THINKING people dismiss as trash.
I'm glad to hear that you want to spread your story about your claim of having been poisoned because you repeated Bill Cooper's BS.
Exactly what evidence and proof can
you offer in support of THAT lie?
When, where, and how - are you claiming it happened?
Can ANY of the above be independently verified? Wait, wait. I know. The answer is NO, but I'm sure Spooked believes you.
Disinfo agents, Shills, and Trolls use the very same tactic as you use whenever you get trapped. So does every other right winger on the Web. When they're caught in a lie trap, they always say "I've already answered that".
When can we expect YOU to lay out an argument for Bill Cooper's theory? If his isn't the one you're referring to, then lay out an argument for the one you ARE referring to.
I don't think you can. I think you're acting the way you are because you've been trapped in your own BS.
Scardy cat.
Gestapo Colonel "Early Wynn" who
1. is too gutless to even post his former moniker here because he got caught lying, and crying that "Spooked you are blocking me." while posting, so no miniker now--correction, he ended with "scardy cat" so that is his new Moniker!
2. Won’t explain how he went to the Army's West Point, yet becomes an Air Force Colonel, unless he was always CIA
3. Won’t post where he was stationed on 11/22/63, yet speaks personally of “Bill” Greer, assassin of President Kennedy, and Note he was about 33 years old then (naturally), yes he's an old F#** now, which is OK if he were only a human being
4. Even posted here that he was very familiar with Dealey Plaza. Many of us have been there, but he says his knowledge is special--from being there on 11/22/63??
5. Won’t say who he “thinks” did it, when asked by someone here, basically said the Hangout of “it’s unknowable” (CIA claptrap)
6.said the CIA’s only site/forum/blog etc. is their acknowledged public one--only a CIA pig would say that
7.Calls Bill Cooper a “criminal” when this Navy (ONI) man first gave his leg to tell the truth (run off the road by Early’s colleagues), then gave his life, assassinated by Early’s colleagues shortly after 9/11/01 to insert Alex Jones to "head" the movement. Only the murderers would call Cooper a criminal, which they did since the 1970’s, for his telling the world Greer fired the fatal shot.
8. Now tries to hide my work which proved that Greer fired twice with his 2 head turns, first hitting Connally (in on it, he was LBJ’s boy) and the second shot killing the President. Cooper did not know this because he did not have the audio added to the Zapruder film. You can now find this on youtube, but it’s been a bit altered. The original clearly shows and TELLS that two shots were fired at the apex of Greer’s 2 turns, and you can even see that they did not completely erase Greer’s gun, if you look carefully at frame 313, just past Kellerman’s head. Look for YOURSELF, don’t be fooled by all the CIA liars, including the “authors”.
9. Continues to take advantage of Spooked, and take over this blog to post the CIA’s lies
10. Said he would stop posting here, but lied about that too.
11. proves with every stupid post and his trolling here since the beginning, that he is an agent, no longer using his “Early” moniker because he lost all credibility with previous lies
Please counter this CIA agent by posting the article that has them worried
http://anonymous-physicist.blogspot.com/2008/06/ultimate-truths-part-vii-poisoning.html
Thank you.
Anonymous Physicist
That's all well and good, but phot analysis experts such as Dr. John Costella
who know that JFK was assassinated in a conspiracy, have studied the Z film
and their published findings show that Greer had NOTHING in his left hand and therefore could not have shot anyone while he was driving the limo.
Aside from the fact that the evidence shows that Greer didn't have a gun in his hand, there are many other facts which support the
idea that Bill Cooper's theory is totally IMplausible.
If you feel so strongly that you are right, then I challenge you to
post your theory on JFK Lancer forum or on the Spartacus JFK Assassination Debate forum which is
at http://tinyurl.com/3n9wre or at
www.alt.assassination.jfk forum or
www.alt.conspiracy.jfk - or any of the other prominent JFK assassination research forums.
I don't believe you have the courage of your convictions, so I don't think you'll do that, but there they are, just in case one day you overdo your meds and decide to test your mettle.
Anyone can do a simple google search and find out the truth about Bill "I'm not really a crazy criminal, I just act that way" Cooper.
Now, before you post more nonsense,
respond SUBSTANTIVELY to the points
that I've posted about your theory.
Post them here first and don't worry. It's unlikely that anyone from the above forums will see your
post. Then, if your arguments have any persuasive value at all, you can go to the above forums and let some very knowledgeable people explain to you why THEY know that
you are 100% wrong and why there is
NO credible evidence in support of the notion that Greer shot JFK AND
Connally.
Now, will someone please give the fake physicist a lesson in reading comprehension. It just might help her understand that it's foolish to lie about things I've said - because even if Spooked has deleted
my comment saying that you don't DESERVE a response, I've saved it.
You know, just in case.
How predictable!
After I ask people to use their own Eyes, Ears, and Brains, and NOT those of the CIA, or its vast minions, he comes back with the same old nonsense.
And still won’t post any moniker, not his old one "Early” or any moniker at all.
A.P.
You won't accept my challenge to let others explain to you why they're convinced that it's laughable to claim that Greer shot JFK & Connally?
There's obviously no one HERE who knows anything about the subject, so wouldn't it make sense to post your
theory where there ARE people who have researched the JFK assassination
case extensively?
Dr. David Mantik is one such person. He has a Ph.D in PHYSICS and is also an M.D..
People like Dr. Mantik and Jack White (acknowleged expert in JFK assassination films analysis and photo expert who has studied and written extensively concerning the alleged manned Moon landing)...
along with Bill Miller (another leading assassination films and photo analysis expert).
Wouldn't it be smart and prudent to take into consideration what people like them
have to say?
Who knows, they may even agree with you! Wouldn't that make your day!
When can we expect to see you post your theory on one or more of the sites I gave you?
To insure that real physicists don't do further injury to your delicate ego, you could just say that what you are posting is Bill Cooper's theory.
Now, what do you say? Will you do it?
How predictable!
After I ask people to use their own Eyes, Ears, and Brains, and NOT those of the CIA, or its vast minions, he comes back with the same old nonsense.
And still won’t post any moniker, not his old one "Early” or any moniker at all.
A.P.
When can we expect you to respond to the many substantive questions that
have been asked about your claim to have proven who killed JFK?
Here's another one for you: did Greer also shoot JFK in the back and in the neck? Please answer and explain your reasoning.
Bonus question: what are your qualifications for your claim to be a Physicist, and how can they be
verified?
BTW - do you know the difference
in operational jurisdiction between
the CIA and NSA? The reason I ask is because you don't appear to know that and in order to understand some of the issues raised by your
fertile imagination, it's important
to know at least a little bit about
what you post about. You aren't expected to know about little-known
acronyms used by various services or any of the inferior (smaller, non-military/Defense Dept.)
information collection and dissemination groups (actually, very few people know much beyond what CIA and NSA stand for).
Post a Comment
<< Home