The “33-ton”, or is it “330-ton”, Section Of Outer Wall Structure Exploded from WTC Tower on 9/11

A Message from the PTB Regarding Reynolds, Wood & “DEW”

by The Anonymous Physicist

Previously I have exposed what the beloved number 33 means to the PTB. I stated here and here that two possible things have been demonstrated. It either signifies something nuclear, or is a code to the media to promote this person and the legend about him/her. (Or it may signify both.) This brings us to the matter at hand--this exploded section (from Judy Wood’s site; see above picture) of outer wall, steel structure from a WTC tower.

The 33 ton weight apparently has come from a calculation from Wood, with great difficulty and help from someone else, as we shall see. It is in the paper: “Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Disintegrate?: A peer-review of Steven E. Jones' 9/11 Research” by Morgan Reynolds and Judy Wood, from Reynolds website here. But wait, we see that in an earlier version of their paper here, they stated the weight was 330 tons. It says, “...330-ton section of outer wall columns ripped off side of tower.” (As always, use your find function to locate the “33”.) And hereI have found the genesis of this. At the “godlikeproductions" website, the forum moderator, “SHR”, helped Wood to "correct" 330 tons to 33 tons*! (An earlier page at that thread stated that she was stopping her activity as the webmaster for ST911.)

Let me now examine this outer wall section. There is no way it’s mass can be estimated to two decimal places! That is, at best maybe say your estimate finds 30 tons, or 300 tons; no way can you have an estimate of two digits. I don’t think one can safely estimate its mass to within a factor of two actually. Look at the photo again. Part of it is obscured by smoke and debris. So we can’t be sure just what its dimensions actually are. Neither can we be certain of its distance from the other structures in the photo. Estimates can be made of its dimensions, composition (steel), and density to arrive at some figure. But there is no way, with all the uncertainty herein, that a two-digit number can be obtained. More scientific would have been to list a range of weights, say 10-100 tons.

I see that this tonnage--first 330 tons--then 33 tons--subsequently spread on the net. Proving several things. First that immense harm is done to the 911truth movement by such shoddy, or deliberately manipulated, calculations that others then will take as gospel. Then there is the use of the 33 (whether as 330 or 33). As I have stated, there is no way to arrive at such a precise number from such uncertain evidence. It likely demonstrates a deliberate act. For either or both of the two factors I have detailed in my articles--either to get the legend promoted (here the evidence-free DDT [DEW Disinfo Theory]-- or that something nuclear is involved. Or in this case both, as the 9/11 WTC event WAS nuclear.

Reynolds and Wood are hereby showing their “33”colors, as to who they are likely working for, and what they are trying to hide-- the nuclear destruction of the WTC which is detailed here www.wtcdemolition.blogspot.com. Indeed Reynolds and Wood hint to the world what they are sent in to deny, when their own article (cited above) includes this photo (below) of tower destruction:


next to this photo (below) of what actually caused it:

Need we say more?

*Note from Spooked: My own calculations indicate the falling section of columns is conservatively between 30-60 tons, the difference depending on the exact part of the tower it came from, as lighter columns were used towards the top of the tower. Previously, I calculated a 24 foot column to be between 1 to 2 tons, and there are at least 30 x 24' column equivalents in the picture.