Will the Media Now Report John McCain's Affairs?
I have never been one to care much about a politician's sex life, as long as it involves consenting adults. If someone has an affair, it just seems like it's the way of the world, rather than any great moral failing.
But now that the media has outed the Edwards affair, what is stopping them from reporting John McCain's? There was the reported recent affair with a lobbyist, as well as the well-known affair when he cheated on his first wife.
There seems to be a funny rule in the mainstream media, that Democratic affairs are always more noteworthy, and always more damaging than Republican ones. More on this here.
Note, the NYTimes story that very tentatively reported a possible affair with McCain and Vicki Iseman, was overall criticized by the MSM, and has had almost no impact in the campaign. McCain merely issued a weak denial, and the press ate it up. Shouldn't there be a new interest in this story, by any sense of fair play?
But now that the media has outed the Edwards affair, what is stopping them from reporting John McCain's? There was the reported recent affair with a lobbyist, as well as the well-known affair when he cheated on his first wife.
There seems to be a funny rule in the mainstream media, that Democratic affairs are always more noteworthy, and always more damaging than Republican ones. More on this here.
Note, the NYTimes story that very tentatively reported a possible affair with McCain and Vicki Iseman, was overall criticized by the MSM, and has had almost no impact in the campaign. McCain merely issued a weak denial, and the press ate it up. Shouldn't there be a new interest in this story, by any sense of fair play?
posted by spooked at 9:53 AM
6 Comments:
Your post merely underscores the need for a return to partisan media outlets.
Until about 60 or years ago, that's the way things were.
Today, all partisanship has been leached out of major media and we are left with only right-wing outlets.
Right-wing media outlets are not likely to publish unfavorable stories about candidates who carry their water.
You know, kind of like how some blog sites delete messages that the owner disagrees with.
But, you would never act in such a hypocritical way, thank goodness, huh "ap"?
[Expletive deleted] you very much for the intel agency “view” of this.
Remember this about you:
http://covertoperations.blogspot.com/2008/07/remastermind-needs-to-reveal-his.html
It’s FOUR WEEKS now that we have been waiting.
A.P's very words have proven that he is a "real physicist".
none of us care if you (3:47) think he has a beautiful mind or not.
MY very words prove that 1:06 is right.
None of the rest of us here care whether or not YOU think that to be a real physicist requires nothing more than just claiming you're one.
That's from
The REMASTERMIND, WHO HAS NOW HAD 45 YEARS PLUS ONE MONTH TO GET HIS STORY STRAIGHT ON WHAT HE DID ON NOV. 22, 1963:
Tuesday, July 15, 2008
The “REMASTERMIND” Needs to Reveal His Timeline for Nov. 22, 1963
Further, He Must Relinquish Any Attempts at Revisionist Re-Mastering of the Truth of the Kennedy Assassination
By Spooked and The Anonymous Physicist
This blog has recently had the opportunity to interact with someone in a way that may have historical significance. The chronology of this must first be detailed. For several years there was a frequent commenter here who used the moniker, “Early Wynn.” His comments were those of a liberal, and then gatekeeper of someone’s version of history. After Anonymous Physicist (A.P) began posting articles and comments here, Early Wynn became quite vociferous in denouncing A.P.’s articles and comments, especially if the assassination of President Kennedy was mentioned. A.P. had presciently accused “Early Wynn” of being posted/ordered to be at this blog, as a gatekeeper because he himself had some role in the Kennedy Assassination, and/or the cover-up of it, from the beginning! Similarly were “Early Wynn’s” strong reactions to A.P.’s articles on the assassinations of Rev. King, and Robert Kennedy. After Early Wynn was caught in numerous lies, including accusing Spooked of “blocking him” (all the while he was posting), this commenter dropped the “Early Wynn” moniker, and continued to post anonymously. However, Spooked recalls that three years ago, someone with the same style as “Early Wynn,” contacted him via email, and told him (without being asked) to go to the JFKLancer forum for “truth” of the JFK assassination. This person’s email had the name of Bill McWilliams.
More recently, A.P. began to reveal how he has suffered greatly because years ago he revealed the Ultimate Truth of the JFK assassination; namely that Secret Service Driver William Greer not only fired the fatal head shot to Kennedy, but Greer also first shot Connally (accidentally). A.P. has revealed how he has been brutally assaulted, heavily wiretapped, and attempted murder, via mercury poisoning of his entire house which he breathed in for two years before nearly dying, was perpetrated against him by what he calls the Gestapo (intelligence) agencies of the USA. A.P. revealed that all this occurred after he had obtained a version of the Zapruder film whereby, in the late 1970’s the House Committee on Assassinations added a motorcade policeman’s dictabelt recording (that was on during the assassination) to the Zapruder film. This audio-added version of the Z film shows, and tells, that at the apex of Greer’s two head turns, first Connally is hit, and then Kennedy’s head is partially blown off, and his body is slammed straight back in the limo. Others have said this beginning in the 1960’s, with researcher Fred Newcomb. and his extensive eyewitness interviews, and his book that all publishers refused to publish. Bill Cooper became famous in the 1980’s and 1990’s for showing that Greer had shot Kennedy, and was himself assassinated just two months after 9/11. Millions have read Cooper’s book, “Behold A Pale Horse,” and seen his videos, as well as being able to see the above actions for themselves on the Z film. A.P. has written that virtually everyone at the scene knew that Greer had completed the deed, and that the regime manufactured the mystery; and the intel agencies controlled that “mystery” with the industry they then created of bogus hangouts, authors, “researchers”, books, articles, museums, websites, forums, etc., all being run by the intel agencies.
A few weeks ago, after A.P. again cited the audio-added Zapruder film as proof of Greer’s two hits, an anonymous commenter (in the same style as the earlier “Early Wynn”) wrote this: “I think that's just terrible. Your donkey had an "audio-added Zapruder film" - an impossibility, since the Z film was made on a camera that didn't record sound - but wait, it gets curiouser and curiouser….” This despite it being historical fact that the House Committee’s audio experts added the Dictabelt audio to the video of the Z film, in the late 1970’s. As this commenter himself wrote, it did get curiouser, when this person himself put up a link to this article:
http://www.democratherald.com/articles/2008/06/29/news/top_story/1aaa01_dictaphone.txt
It is about none other than a person named Bill McWilliams, and his role as the “Remastermind” of this very same dictabelt recording, that the person cursed out A.P. for citing! When A.P. wrote that this commenter was himself Bill McWilliams, his reply was, "Regarding your interest in the dictabelt research: no definitive conclusion is expected anytime soon… Most importantly, JFK was killed by a shot that originated on either the North side GK or, as more and more of us have come to believe, perhaps from the South side (near the triple underpass). The thinking is that shot(s) may have been fired from the North GK as a diversion. The sound and the observed gunsmoke + the smell of rifle fire may have been used to divert attention away from the South side of Elm street.” Note how that paragraph says in effect. “It’s too early to tell what the results will be, but here’s what happened anyway…” His response can also be construed as saying, “ANYONE BUT SS AGENT GREER DID IT.” The last sentence, of course, is the reason for the creation of the JFK assassination industry, and what it has always been focused on. But the above response from the anonymous commenter can only be construed as tacit affirmation that he is Bill McWilliams, as who else would know where along in the remastering (with Lawrence Livermore Labs’ computers), the “project” was? Furthermore as his style matches “Early Wynn,” this was highly likely the moniker Mr. McWilliams used for several years at this blog.
The newspaper article on Bill McWilliams/The Remastermind was posted at many blogs, and newspapers, around the country. It details that Bill McWilliams worked for Dictaphone for 33 years, and retired in 1989. It states that Mr. McWilliams both heard the assassination, and saw the JFK hospital “admission”, on Nov. 22, 1963, and is currently working with Lawrence Livermore Labs (whose main job for the last 60-odd years has been to manufacture or design nuclear bombs), to “remaster” the dictabelt recording. The Democrat Herald article was written by a reporter (Steve Lathrop) who claims he directly interviewed Mr. McWilliams and his wife, as they live in that area of Oregon. Now there are numerous “facts” in the article that are both incorrect, and are of great historical and legal importance. Again, it was almost certainly Bill McWilliams who himself posted this article here, and he is obligated to provide the truth of these matters herein. The article claims that Mr. McWilliams both heard the assassination, and saw the bringing in of JFK into Parkland Hospital, just minutes after the assassination. Some of the article’s more obvious false statements include its saying that an ambulance brought JFK to Parkland Hospital, and that “the hospital, which was located directly behind the Dallas Police Station...” Now much of the world has seen (some version of) the Zapruder film whereby the limo driver--and NOT any ambulance--speeds up (only after the job is done) and races to Parkland Hospital, some miles away from Dealey Plaza. A commenter, “Yeuhd” [not vetted by either of us], to the article itself posted that the distance between the two is 4.6 miles (a google map search of modern Dallas shows Parkland Hospital is over 9 miles from the downtown Dallas Police Station). Now Mr. McWilliams apparently did partially respond to some of this, at comments at this blog, and wrote that the reporter, Steve Lathrop, “got it wrong.” He admits that JFK was taken in the limo to Parkland, and that Parkland was “near” Dictaphone headquarters, not Dallas P.D. headquarters. Notice that in addition to getting the buildings wrong, “directly behind” has morphed into “near.” How near these two places were needs to now be explicitly stated by Mr. McWilliams! Please provide us with all the street addresses, from 1963, of Dallas PD HQ, Dictaphone Office (where you worked), and Parkland’s address. These errors are remarkable on several accounts. First that such few and simple statements supposedly made directly to a professional reporter would be so erroneous, and that this reporter did not either know anything already about this momentous event, or bother to check these historical “facts” with another readily available source.
But there are crucial questions posed by A.P. to "Bill McWilliams" that were ignored, or were met with runarounds and insults. So we will re-pose these questions, or issues here. The article claims that “It was McWilliams who serviced the now-famous Dictabelt #10 at the Dallas police station the day of the assassination.” Yet the website of Mary Ferrell has an article by D.B. Thomas that states that a female technician did that: “The DPD technician with the responsibility for operating the recorders in 1963 was able to identify the writing [on the tape] as hers.” (emphasis added) Mr. McWilliams is not mentioned in the article by D.B. Thomas, at the Ferrell website. Neither does Mr. McWilliams name show up in any search relating to the JFKassassination, despite the overwhelming amount of online material on this event.
So, Mr. McWilliams: Did you or did you not, in any way, process, service, or alter the dictabelt assassination recording, in 1963, or at any other time? And if so, where and when did you do this? And why does the D.B. Thomas article not reference you?
Next crucially how could Mr. McWilliams be at both events--the assassination, and the Hospital “admission”--that were miles apart, yet so near in time. Only the racing Secret Service should have been able to be a part of both events! The article includes: “I heard it all as it happened,” McWilliams says.” So Mr. McWilliams, your complete timeline is absolutely needed here, and we eagerly await your posting this. Or, Mr. McWilliams, were you listening in live to the assassination, at some other location? And just “happened” to be at Parkland a bare few minutes later? If this is the case, a lot of explaining needs to occur, as only the “perpetraitors” would be listening in live-- knowing what was about to unfold, and then knowing where JFK would then be taken.
Also, Mr. McWilliams, the article quotes you as saying, “I don’t deal much with the computers…I don’t really trust them.” How and why exactly then did you set up the arrangement with the massive computer system at Lawrence Livermore Labs?
For the record, from the beginning of the use of the dictabelt audio, there has been an insidious form of doctoring employed. Microphones were set up at various locations in the route and surroundings to try to match the gunshot sounds that are supposedly on the dictabelt recording. But inside the limo has been excluded, in these re-enactments with microphones. Mr. McWilliams-- is the LL Labs once again excluding this possibility from the getgo? If so, then it is clear the process you are involved in is merely re-master(mind)ing the recording, and will have no validity. Note that the Thomas article states that the LL labs re-mastering of the dictabelt recording, is a laser re-mastering. And it concludes, “the advantage of the Laser copy is that it will be an authentic copy of the evidence recording in the sense that it will be an untampered copy, which is not necessarily the case with the recordings available on E-Bay.” Thus the best that can be hoped for is that Lawrence Livermore will produce a copy that is better than those “available on E-Bay.”
Another issue is that the two of us saw that this article was briefly online with the photo of Bill McWilliams removed from it! This occurred shortly after "Bill McWilliams" released the link to himself at comments here. Who has the power to remove the photo? After being down for a few hours, the picture was subsequently put back up.
In conclusion, it is essential that Bill McWilliams reply here with the following, as he himself put up the link to the article on him and his role during the assassination of President Kennedy.
1. The Nov. 1963 addresses of your Dictaphone Office, the Dallas Police Dept, Parkland Hospital, and any other locations where you were on 11/22/63. Please include approx. distances of each from the others, and from Dealey Plaza. Most importantly, according to the article, is the distance from Dictaphone HQ and Parkland Hospital, and from Dealey Plaza, as your correction to the article, implies that you could hear the assassination occurring (at Dealey Plaza) from your location at Dictaphone HQ; and that from Dictaphone HQ, you could also then see the JFK Hospital admission. This appears to be impossible if some location is say 2 miles or so from each. In addition to the distance stopping the sounds of the assassination, buildings would block the sight of the hospital!
2. Your complete timeline of where you were at every moment of 11/22/63.
3. Your complete set of interactions with the Motorcycle Cop’s dictabelt recording of the assassination beginning on 11/22/63.
4. Your explanation of how you could possibly have heard the assassination “as it happened” and then seen JFK brought into Parkland Hospital just a few minutes later, when only the Secret Service men racing him, to Parkland, should have been able to do both.
5. Relatedly, were you listening in on the assassination live? And if so, why? We note that the article on Bill McWilliams says he “heard” the assassination, and “saw” the hospital admission.
We thank you in advance for direct answers to these simple but crucial questions, and for not offering any runaround or insults. If however, all these crucial issues, in this paragraph, and the entire article here, are not addressed, the reasons why will also be clear, as will be the “reputations” of any site or person, etc. that you proclaim as “truthful.”
Finally why didn’t Mr. McWilliams IMMEDIATELY post corrections himself to these errors, of historical importance, at that article? The person who apparently is Bill McWilliams, who posts here, and who used to post as Early Wynn, repeatedly proclaims here that all he is doing here is putting out the truth, especially about the assassinations of JFK, RFK, and MLK. Yet he did not immediately correct the serious errors in the article about him in regards to the assassination of JFK. (Only a couple of corrections in general are up, posted by “Yeuhd”.) Indeed the article STILL has serious errors remaining, including Mr. McWilliams (allegedly) saying the article should say he was at Dictaphone HQ, not DPD HQ. Why did Mr. McWilliams not correct the errors, and why is he still not correcting the errors HIMSELF at the Democrat Herald online article? He is often here day after day, sometimes minute after minute, posting his “rebuttals” and "corrections" to what Anonymous Physicist’s research or direct involvement has revealed. All the errors, in that article, must be corrected, now by Mr. McWilliams. Likewise, the crucial historical, and legal, questions and issues, cited here, need to be answered-- by Mr. McWilliams.
He's had 45 years to get his story straight
PLUS ONE MONTH
i don't care what AP's credentials are, he proved that he is a real physicist when he demonstrated exactly where and how bazant et al are incorrect.
Post a Comment
<< Home