Everything You Always Wanted to Know about 9/11 Cell Phone Calls
but were afraid to ask-- by David Ray Griffin.
The article starts out extremely tediously, critiquing the critique of someone named Andrew Kornkven, but the second half is worth a read.
Ultimately, it's hard to disagree with his conclusions:
The article starts out extremely tediously, critiquing the critique of someone named Andrew Kornkven, but the second half is worth a read.
Ultimately, it's hard to disagree with his conclusions:
1) Reported cell phone calls were central to the creation of the claim that the airliners had been hijacked.
(2) The FBI had actively participated in the creation of this claim.
(3) The FBI, a few years later, renounced its endorsement of high-altitude cell phone calls and thereby had to make changes in its reports about several of the alleged calls---changes that are most obvious with respect to the alleged calls from Tom Burnett and Amy Sweeney.
(4) These changes constitute an implicit admission by the FBI that its original claims about cell phone calls from the planes were false.
(5) This admission should lead us to conclude that the whole story about phone calls was an elaborate fabrication.
posted by spooked at 11:05 AM
2 Comments:
yes that griffin piece is a tedious read.
griffin is not stupid so he does realize that real 767/757s are nothing more than giant flying beer cans and in reality would squash against the side of a wtc, an extra-reinforced pentagon and especially the hard ground of shanksville like a regular beer can beneath a boot-heel.
since griffin is not stupid his total failure in pointing out the fact that there was not a single piece of real 767/757 debris at any of the 4 supposed crash-sites can only be intentional.
oh well, he is the leader of the so-called *9/11 truth movement*, in reality, the *1/2 truth movement*.
"ow my movement hurts!"
...David Ray Griffin
The article is about reported cell phone calls and you're upset because he didn't mention anything about airliner debris?
Why not also act uppity by admonishing him for not mentioning your favorite WTC nuking theories?
Griffin is a careful, thoughtful, thorough and highly respected researcher with well-known credentials.
You want SHRILL? See any of ap's posts.
Post a Comment
<< Home