Humint Events Online: Ground Zero Still Radioactive

Friday, April 17, 2009

Ground Zero Still Radioactive

Building new WTC office towers could be "put off for decades". Supposedly due to the bad real estate market... but I think we know the REAL reason.

posted by spooked at 7:09 PM

8 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

So the powers that be who had no problem using nukes to kill thousands of people that day all of a sudden have had a change of heart and don't want to put anyone else in harms way...

Makes perfect sense.

9:12 PM  
Blogger spooked said...

First of all, clearly there is a significant delay in putting up the new towers-- that isn't completely explained by the poor economy. so there has got to be another explanation. Second of all, there may well be very different concerns with what happened on 9/11 with what is done now-- and different people in charge. Third, the evidence for nuking and the China syndrome is clear. So there likely IS still radioactivity at that site.

7:34 AM  
Blogger pteranodon said...

9/11 museum? I guess that eventually there will be W54s and such on display.

8:03 AM  
Blogger K.L. Ashley said...

Why replace the towers, ever? It was a stupid concept and they know it. Leave it to Indonesia, Dubai, China.

Could be a pedestrian park, and don't tell them about the nukes. Sort of surreptitious test on the effects on the human, like the army did once. Oh, but all of a sudden no one believes the official version, and the park is vacant. Force it out.

10:42 AM  
Blogger K.L. Ashley said...

Das Bild (MSM of the 1st magnitude): New WTC complete in 2037, etc. Pictures. In the article, a Hyperlink to

"102 Minutes, Time line of the tragedy of the events of 9/11."

A summary of the official version, Pilot Atta, the whole crock.

Here to stay! Money buys anything.

12:40 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Outside of this blog and the incoherent mind of the "AP", the case for nuking is anything but "clear". I'd say the vast majority of the truther movement had dismissed the idea long ago, but that would imply they ever embraced it to begin with. Even that crowd isn't that stupid.

Tell me... of the tens of thousands of people who have lived and worked in Lower Manhattan over the last 8 years, how many have shown the effects of radiation poisoning?

8:17 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

the case for nuking is anything but "clear".it seems to be clear enough to anyone who knows how to read english.
wow the ghost of sword's past!

6:23 AM  
Blogger K.L. Ashley said...

"how many have shown the effects of radiation poisoning?"

Who knows? Health records are not for public distribution. But especially 9/11 stuff.

How much general knowledge is out there on the dose from "mini" nukes. The US created these to be "safe" for the soldiers, of course, like DU munitions.

11:13 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Powered by Blogger