Clear Evidence of First Hit Video Fakery
That is: extra explosions/dust pimples that don't correspond to the hole (the ones at the far left, the upwards bend in the zigzag, and the abnormally large one on the right):
Via this nice article. The abnormal explosions/dust pimples are reminiscent of the ones in the second hit.
Via this nice article. The abnormal explosions/dust pimples are reminiscent of the ones in the second hit.
posted by spooked at 10:50 AM
3 Comments:
many cameras would have captured the first strike, CCTV etc, yet all we go to view is this blurred object.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YHrw3Ct_Kec
We know it's not a real jetliner
because we can SEE that it isn't.
The resolution HAS to be worthless
because otherwise, even Mary Sixpack
would know a real plane didn't crash
into WTC 1, 2, or the Pentagon.
The author talks about "something
or some things (missiles)"
hitting the WTC. Limited hangout
that doesn't inspire confidence
in his bona fides.
even more obviously fake than the many wtc2 *plane hit*.
Post a Comment
<< Home