The AA11 Conundrum
On the one hand, we have the fact that AA11 wasn't in the BTS database and was likely not even a real flight on 9/11.
On the other hand, we have the evidence that there were TWO flight 11's that boarded people on 9/11.
Were there two fake flights, part of some terror drill, that were never part of the BTS system because they were a separate entity? Or were there two "real" flights recorded in the BTS database, and BTS was later scrubbed to hide that there were two? I would guess the former, but the other is possible.
We should note there is also evidence that UA175 was a double flight, yet at least one flight 175 was listed in the BTS database.
Also worth remembering that ATC thought flight 11 kept going south even after the north tower was hit.
One problem is that we have too many planes unaccounted for, since it's pretty clear they never hit the WTC. Obviously, the perps had a lot of redundancy for planes in their plans, guess that gave them evidence for planes and a certain amount of flexibility. What happened to these planes? Who knows?
But mainly, I just find it freaking weird that there is evidence for TWO flight 11's, but there was no record of EITHER ONE in the BTS database.
On the other hand, we have the evidence that there were TWO flight 11's that boarded people on 9/11.
Were there two fake flights, part of some terror drill, that were never part of the BTS system because they were a separate entity? Or were there two "real" flights recorded in the BTS database, and BTS was later scrubbed to hide that there were two? I would guess the former, but the other is possible.
We should note there is also evidence that UA175 was a double flight, yet at least one flight 175 was listed in the BTS database.
Also worth remembering that ATC thought flight 11 kept going south even after the north tower was hit.
One problem is that we have too many planes unaccounted for, since it's pretty clear they never hit the WTC. Obviously, the perps had a lot of redundancy for planes in their plans, guess that gave them evidence for planes and a certain amount of flexibility. What happened to these planes? Who knows?
But mainly, I just find it freaking weird that there is evidence for TWO flight 11's, but there was no record of EITHER ONE in the BTS database.
posted by spooked at 10:08 PM
3 Comments:
Way way back in the '70's, like '73 maybe, I was living outside Chicago when it appeared the administration brought down a plane with E howard Hunt's wife and a tv reporter after another blackmail meeting with Nixon's people. The crashed plane was met by waiting spooks in a line of black government cars. The key thing is, the administration seemed to just "take over" the airline and the investigating agencies by appointing white house staff to leadership of the airline, leadership in the FAA, and leadership in the Nist.
The bottom line to my blabbing is: would be good to see if such a thing happened in the wake of 911. Has anyone ever sat down with a senior executive of the affected airlines to get the scoop on all the discrepancies, and was there a move to put coup figures in these positions with the airlines?
back in '04 or so after i had realized no-planes and that the BTS data for 9/11/01 showed AA11 not even scheduled to fly for that day, i had occasion to be at the cargo desk of AA @ LAX - i asked the gal at the desk about AA11 and she said, "we are not allowed to talk about that."
The late Sherman Skolnick investigated the UA crash in which Mrs. Hunt perished. He, Skolnick,
claimed that one or more suspicious
people on the flight walked off the plane wearing asbestos suits.
Sherman was prone to hyperbole, but
I believe he was correct that the
crash was caused intentionally by a party or parties unknown...but who were almost certainly working on behalf of a government agency
or department. Most likely CIA.
Post a Comment
<< Home