One of the Better Proofs of Video Fakery
is the discrepancy in "puffball" position between the Hezarkhani video and the Fairbanks video:
The idea that this discrepancy is some trick of shadow or perspective just doesn't hold up, when you examine this video carefully.
One importance of this "puffball" discrepancy is also that it formally proves CGI compositing was used to insert the plane into the videos!
Thus, this evidence alone rules out that some type of weird real plane object hit the tower and that the videos are real. They are not real-- they are 100% bogus, all of them, as hard as it may be to believe.
The idea that this discrepancy is some trick of shadow or perspective just doesn't hold up, when you examine this video carefully.
One importance of this "puffball" discrepancy is also that it formally proves CGI compositing was used to insert the plane into the videos!
Thus, this evidence alone rules out that some type of weird real plane object hit the tower and that the videos are real. They are not real-- they are 100% bogus, all of them, as hard as it may be to believe.
2 Comments:
Be careful--note the length of the video--2:33.
Then this is just another example of what I wrote in my article, "Zero Interaction Physics." That both the plane and the tower show NO physical interaction. They merely painted in puffballs, as sequentially less and less of the plane is also "painted" in.
And they apparently didn't bother to match their painted in puffballs in their CGI videos. Perhaps MITOP.
Anonymous Physicist
definitely MITOP
Post a Comment
<< Home