The ELT Oddity
Emergency Locator Transmitters (ELTs) went off early for both flight 11 and flight 175. Seems highly improbable that they went off by accident.
Possible explanations:
1) the flights crashed or were blown up somewhere else than the WTC.
2) the ELT signals were fake, part of the fake electronic hijack signals put out as part of the 9/11 wargames, and went off to signal the fake crashes, but were mistimed.
3) the ELT signals were fake, mistimed as part of the extensive 9/11 disinfo setup.
I favor the second possibility.
Note the extensive number of 33's in this NYTimes article on the flight 11 ELT, and note DAL2433 was one of the flights that noted the ELT. 33s are found throughout 9/11.
Possible explanations:
1) the flights crashed or were blown up somewhere else than the WTC.
2) the ELT signals were fake, part of the fake electronic hijack signals put out as part of the 9/11 wargames, and went off to signal the fake crashes, but were mistimed.
3) the ELT signals were fake, mistimed as part of the extensive 9/11 disinfo setup.
I favor the second possibility.
Note the extensive number of 33's in this NYTimes article on the flight 11 ELT, and note DAL2433 was one of the flights that noted the ELT. 33s are found throughout 9/11.
posted by spooked at 10:45 AM
8 Comments:
1, Why quote from such a blog--just look at all their links.
2. I thought the most likely conclusion is that there were no passenger planes flying toward the WTC. (And that's why no AF jets sent to intercept, etc.) So therefore this piece is more of the BS that actually supports the regime's bogus 9/11 conspiracy theory.
A.P.
Furthermore putting out fake (mistimed, whatever) ELTs seems to be just more of the MITOP in effect for the intelligentsia.
So its a non-issue about non-flying planes.
It's still interesting to me, and gives some clues about how they may have run the scam.
ELTs, automatic ELTs were not required on commercial aircraft 911 and prior. 11, 77, 93 and 175 did not have ELTs that go off due to crashes. They have survival ELTs, used by the crew after a crash, if needed, mandated on over-water flights; or other requirements per FAR Part 121. The FAR related to commercial carries. The FDR has beacon, think it is water activated.
I totally match with anything you have written.
ELTs are designed to detect an impending crash. This is so that pilots can focus 100% on recovering the aircraft rather than talking to air traffic control. A 767 flying at low altitude at that velocity could very well have set off the ELT on flight 11 several minutes before the actual crash. So it makes perfect sense that there would be reports of an ELT signal before the crash.
I'm not sure you even "know" what a conspiracy theory is. No matter what you say there WERE four passenger planes that crashed into the WTC, the Pentagon and a field in Pennsylvania.
Really read this https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Bd2ARpzU89kC&pg=PA13&lpg=PA13&dq=plane+elt+9/11&source=bl&ots=31wKN6O8ER&sig=HyUDU9tzCN_-Y-ceDCsVUHaxhJo&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CE8Q6AEwCzgKahUKEwjpneq8q5nHAhXJF9sKHY-SBUI#v=onepage&q=plane%20elt%209%2F11&f=false
You are NOT "uncovering the truth" about 9/11. No you make me feel you are stupid like the commentators on here. You're SO retarded you CANT even see 9/11 is NOT a "fraud or scam" for that matter.
https://books.google.co.uk/books?id=Bd2ARpzU89kC&pg=PA13&lpg=PA13&dq=plane+elt+9/11&source=bl&ots=31wKN6O8ER&sig=HyUDU9tzCN_-Y-ceDCsVUHaxhJo&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CE8Q6AEwCzgKahUKEwjpneq8q5nHAhXJF9sKHY-SBUI#v=onepage&q=plane%20elt%209%2F11&f=false
Post a Comment
<< Home