Numbers
As readers of this site know, I have become interested in numerology, and particularly the use of 33, as code for the PTB.
Today, apparently the NYTimes and others in the media think it is important to tell us this about odd number of fuel rods:
Today, apparently the NYTimes and others in the media think it is important to tell us this about odd number of fuel rods:
TEHRAN — Iran said on Tuesday that it had begun loading the first of 163 fuel rods into the core of its first nuclear reactor, set to go into operation early next year, and vowed to pursue nuclear activities “in other areas.”163??? Why such an odd number? Does this number mean anything?
posted by spooked at 8:04 PM
4 Comments:
I do not see the meaning of that # immediately.
I do note that they have been playing up nukes in the last few days. Clinton nuke codes, or was it the football, missing for a long time reveale dnowin ne wbook or such a few days ago.
Then some 11% [yes 11] of US land based nukes offline for a while story, just the other day.
Perhaps signaling something sinister impending. Like a whole bunch of nukes going off? And Q-escape? With fake "terrorists got em" put out by the US regime.
Of course, the Quarantiners will know better, and all hell may break lose. OTOH, maybe all these nukes have already permanently gone "offline" as I have detailed.
A.P.
Spooked:
Here's another nuclear 163 put out at about the same time!
http://www.ocala.com/article/20101026/ARTICLES/101029758/1402/NEWS?Title=Progress-nuclear-plant-fee-approved
A.P.
Thanks AP. That story with the 163 is wild!
Note this nuclear article from today:
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010/10/communications-dropped-to-50-nuke-missiles-in-icbm-snafu/
Communication With 50 Nuke Missiles Dropped in ICBM Snafu
Sounds like a quarantiner incident!
Spooked:
Thanks, but that's the same story as my 11% above. (Post #1)
A.P.
Post a Comment
<< Home