I Never Really Paid Much Attention to the Fake Paul McCartney Story
But this is VERY striking:
The Plastic Macca blog is quite good, and totally devoted to this issue.The top photo array is of Paul McCartney. The second photo array is of his impostor-replacement. One very obvious difference is that the hair parts on different sides.CIA-lebrity impersonator: "Faul"
posted by spooked at 8:35 AM
14 Comments:
wow that's weird. i wonder why they even bother having an imposter paul?
presumably Paul died unexpectedly (or was not willing to go along with the plans) and the PTB had plans for what the Beatles would do, and didn't want them broken up. Money issue too, but I'm sure it's bigger than that.
the doppelganger turned out to be much more talented than the original paul. amazing that his father accepted the replacement.
Some of my best friends are Dopplegangers--you racist.
my doppleganger is bigger than your doppleganger!
It may be that the original Paul did not die straight away and was kept on life support to allow for his recovery (and/or even to enable mind matrix downloading).
The use of a look-a-like double could then be sold to the other band members and families as a clever but temporary arrangement until the original got better.... but he didn't.
When they finally decided to pull the plug on the original, everyone would be in way too deep to back out and expose the charade. (Especially if they were told (and shown film of) how and why the car accident happened - the trauma on which to base some subsequent mind control perhaps).
And I have yet to see a commentary or analysis of what was supposed to have happened to the life the doppleganger had prior to filling in for Paul. Did he go out for ciggarettes and never come back or, did he "die" and have his body replaced by the original Paul?
Curiouser and curiouser perhaps.
anyway the doppleganger was a much better musician and songwriter. the beatles would not have been the same with the original paul.
Everyone that blog cites is intel:
Leary
MM Yogi
Manson
And "the bible"
Dubious.
I doppled over with laughter.
Guess who?
The original.
Can't duplicate me...
maybe everyone that blog cites is indeed intel but if the original paul had brown eyes and then suddenly he has grey eyes and is a little bit taller and his nose is different and the circular pattern of his hair is reversed then maybe there is something to all of this.
There's no doubt in my mind that there is something to all of this!
I am not saying this couldn't be or definitely isn't the case.
But I am not convinced. And I know well the history of what was done to rock stars. Usually they just (OD) off them, or get them arrested or poisoned.
BUT... the hair change is meaningless and citing that gives me pause.
A slight snip of the nose is a thing that many people in entertainment do without ever announcing it. (Hell I've seen films of a young Tyrone Power and he had a snip or two.)
Now Harvey and Lee--I can see different head shapes and more.
i don't believe that the hair change is meaningless. if your hair, looking at your future baldspot from above, circulates clockwise, then the natural part in your hair will be on the left. if it circulates counter-clockwise then the part will be on the right.
you cannot easily change the part from one side to the other and have it look natural as doppleganger's does. i know because i tried to change my part from left to right a good 30 years ago and it did not work.
other than the hair there is the noticeable gain in height (maybe he had a growth spurt at the age of 27?) and the obvious change of eye colour from brown to light grey.
ultimately it does not matter as the beatles' songs with Faul were awesome and would not have existed would they still had Paul.
I am all wigged out on this issue.
Oh my god, there is a great deal of helpful data above!
Post a Comment
<< Home