Measuring Moonquakes
Officially, the Apollo astronauts (AstroNOTs) left several seismographs on the moon surface, that were used to measure moonquakes. It seems several scientific papers were written on data from these devices.
If we assume that no men have ever landed on the moon, where did the data come from to analyze "moonquakes"? I guess there are a few possibilities:
1) the data was completely fabricated by someone at NASA
2) the seismographs were actually reading earth quakes, but were analyzed in the context of moon distances, topology, guesses about moon geology
3) seismographs were placed on the moon by unmanned missions to the moon
4) some bizarre, extremely covert deal with non-human entities who gave us seismograph data from the moon.
Any thoughts out there?
If we assume that no men have ever landed on the moon, where did the data come from to analyze "moonquakes"? I guess there are a few possibilities:
1) the data was completely fabricated by someone at NASA
2) the seismographs were actually reading earth quakes, but were analyzed in the context of moon distances, topology, guesses about moon geology
3) seismographs were placed on the moon by unmanned missions to the moon
4) some bizarre, extremely covert deal with non-human entities who gave us seismograph data from the moon.
Any thoughts out there?
posted by spooked at 1:19 PM
10 Comments:
Most likely #1, with the next likelihood being #3.
yeah, I was thinking those two, with maybe the other way around-- but hard to know for sure.
5) there are no moonquakes, the whole thing is malarky.
Yeah, I thought about the whole thing being fake, just that since several scientists wrote papers on it, assumed they had something to work with and weren't just pulling the numbers out of thin air.
No "reputable," federal grant-sucking scientist has EVER questioned NASA's mountains of "data" and "evidence". That would be professional/academic suicide.
If you're curious, check out Simon Shack's comparison of the "official" photos of something as mundane as the various shuttle launches -- across multiple decades.
Funny thing how the foliage near the launch pad never seems to grow or change shape, year after year. ;)
No "reputable," federal grant-sucking scientist has EVER questioned NASA's mountains of "data" and "evidence". That would be professional/academic suicide.
If you're curious, check out Simon Shack's comparison of the "official" photos of something as mundane as the various shuttle launches -- across multiple decades.
Funny thing how the foliage near the launch pad never seems to grow or change shape, year after year. ;)
Well I saw the shuttle 1/2 way to orbit when I happened to be in NY. Some 6 minutes after liftoff (presumably) from FL. Going into a polar orbit.
I saw it with my great binoculars, in detail.
With all the locals in FL for viewing public liftoffs, somehow I don't think they are faking liftoffs.
SS is not a reputable source either.
But obviously the Moonquake crap is just that and not worth commenting on.
In all likelihood the think is hollow.
A.P.
thing above, not think
A.P.
Of course Mr. Shack is not a "reputable source," because all the important, credentialed and media-promoted plane-huggers and hijacker-huggers say so, either directly, indirectly, or by the power of their simply ignoring him.
But he's nevertheless a mighty thought-provoking source, when you actually examine his intricate and persuasive deconstructions of mainstream media's "evidence" for WHAT WE MUST BELIEVE, if we want to be "reputable" too.
His main point regarding NASA (if you will bother to seek it out) is that their media-distributed "evidence" for their "accomplishments" is riddled with contradictions and fakery, WHATEVER they might have really been doing with our tax money. As to why they've been cooking the photos and videos, lo these many years, we can only speculate -- endlessly.
Thanks for your article, quite useful piece of writing.
Post a Comment
<< Home